Bayesian Additive Regression Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04425v1
• Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:47:32 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Additive Regression Networks
• Authors: Danielle Van Boxel,
• Abstract summary: We train an ensemble of small neural networks for regression tasks. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we sample from the posterior distribution of neural networks that have a single hidden layer. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique on several benchmark regression problems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We apply Bayesian Additive Regression Tree (BART) principles to training an ensemble of small neural networks for regression tasks. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we sample from the posterior distribution of neural networks that have a single hidden layer. To create an ensemble of these, we apply Gibbs sampling to update each network against the residual target value (i.e. subtracting the effect of the other networks). We demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique on several benchmark regression problems, comparing it to equivalent shallow neural networks, BART, and ordinary least squares. Our Bayesian Additive Regression Networks (BARN) provide more consistent and often more accurate results. On test data benchmarks, BARN averaged between 5 to 20 percent lower root mean square error. This error performance does come at the cost, however, of greater computation time. BARN sometimes takes on the order of a minute where competing methods take a second or less. But, BARN without cross-validated hyperparameter tuning takes about the same amount of computation time as tuned other methods. Yet BARN is still typically more accurate.

Related papers

• Favour: FAst Variance Operator for Uncertainty Rating [0.034530027457862]
  Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN) have emerged as a crucial approach for interpreting ML predictions. By sampling from the posterior distribution, data scientists may estimate the uncertainty of an inference. Previous work proposed propagating the first and second moments of the posterior directly through the network. This method is even slower than sampling, so the propagated variance needs to be approximated. Our contribution is a more principled variance propagation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T22:53:20Z)
• Sparsifying Bayesian neural networks with latent binary variables and normalizing flows [10.865434331546126]
  We will consider two extensions to the latent binary Bayesian neural networks (LBBNN) method. Firstly, by using the local reparametrization trick (LRT) to sample the hidden units directly, we get a more computationally efficient algorithm. More importantly, by using normalizing flows on the variational posterior distribution of the LBBNN parameters, the network learns a more flexible variational posterior distribution than the mean field Gaussian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T09:40:28Z)
• Can pruning improve certified robustness of neural networks? [106.03070538582222]
  We show that neural network pruning can improve empirical robustness of deep neural networks (NNs) Our experiments show that by appropriately pruning an NN, its certified accuracy can be boosted up to 8.2% under standard training. We additionally observe the existence of certified lottery tickets that can match both standard and certified robust accuracies of the original dense models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T05:48:51Z)
• Why Lottery Ticket Wins? A Theoretical Perspective of Sample Complexity on Pruned Neural Networks [79.74580058178594]
  We analyze the performance of training a pruned neural network by analyzing the geometric structure of the objective function. We show that the convex region near a desirable model with guaranteed generalization enlarges as the neural network model is pruned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T01:11:07Z)
• S2-BNN: Bridging the Gap Between Self-Supervised Real and 1-bit Neural Networks via Guided Distribution Calibration [74.5509794733707]
  We present a novel guided learning paradigm from real-valued to distill binary networks on the final prediction distribution. Our proposed method can boost the simple contrastive learning baseline by an absolute gain of 5.515% on BNNs. Our method achieves substantial improvement over the simple contrastive learning baseline, and is even comparable to many mainstream supervised BNN methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:59:28Z)
• Training Sparse Neural Networks using Compressed Sensing [13.84396596420605]
  We develop and test a novel method based on compressed sensing which combines the pruning and training into a single step. Specifically, we utilize an adaptively weighted $ell1$ penalty on the weights during training, which we combine with a generalization of the regularized dual averaging (RDA) algorithm in order to train sparse neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T19:35:54Z)
• Stochastic Bayesian Neural Networks [0.0]
  We build on variational inference techniques for bayesian neural networks using the original Evidence Lower Bound. We present a bayesian neural network in which we maximize Evidence Lower Bound using a new objective function which we name as Evidence Lower Bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T19:48:34Z)
• Bayesian Neural Network via Stochastic Gradient Descent [0.0]
  We show how gradient estimation can be applied on bayesian neural networks by gradient estimation techniques. Our work considerably beats the previous state of the art approaches for regression using bayesian neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T18:33:59Z)
• Neural Networks and Value at Risk [59.85784504799224]
  We perform Monte-Carlo simulations of asset returns for Value at Risk threshold estimation. Using equity markets and long term bonds as test assets, we investigate neural networks. We find our networks when fed with substantially less data to perform significantly worse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T17:41:59Z)
• Network Adjustment: Channel Search Guided by FLOPs Utilization Ratio [101.84651388520584]
  This paper presents a new framework named network adjustment, which considers network accuracy as a function of FLOPs. Experiments on standard image classification datasets and a wide range of base networks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T15:51:00Z)
• Cross-Iteration Batch Normalization [67.83430009388678]
  We present Cross-It Batch Normalization (CBN), in which examples from multiple recent iterations are jointly utilized to enhance estimation quality. CBN is found to outperform the original batch normalization and a direct calculation of statistics over previous iterations without the proposed compensation technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T18:52:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.