Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04446v2
• Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 09:59:09 GMT
• Title: Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments
• Authors: David S. Watson, Jordan Penn, Lee M. Gunderson, Gecia Bravo-Hermsdorff, Afsaneh Mastouri, Ricardo Silva,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel solution that provides $textitpartial$ identification in linear systems given a set of $textitleaky instruments$. We derive a convex optimization objective that provides provably sharp bounds on the average treatment effect under some common forms of information leakage.
• Score: 6.2316012741781295
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Instrumental variables (IVs) are a popular and powerful tool for estimating causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, classical approaches rely on strong assumptions such as the $\textit{exclusion criterion}$, which states that instrumental effects must be entirely mediated by treatments. This assumption often fails in practice. When IV methods are improperly applied to data that do not meet the exclusion criterion, estimated causal effects may be badly biased. In this work, we propose a novel solution that provides $\textit{partial}$ identification in linear systems given a set of $\textit{leaky instruments}$, which are allowed to violate the exclusion criterion to some limited degree. We derive a convex optimization objective that provides provably sharp bounds on the average treatment effect under some common forms of information leakage, and implement inference procedures to quantify the uncertainty of resulting estimates. We demonstrate our method in a set of experiments with simulated data, where it performs favorably against the state of the art. An accompanying $\texttt{R}$ package, $\texttt{leakyIV}$, is available from $\texttt{CRAN}$.

Related papers

• Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data [44.31792000298105]
  Accurately predicting conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) is crucial in personalized medicine and digital platform analytics. We develop a novel approach to combine IV and observational data to enable reliable CATE estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T16:40:55Z)
• Minimax Instrumental Variable Regression and $L_2$ Convergence Guarantees without Identification or Closedness [71.42652863687117]
  We study nonparametric estimation of instrumental variable (IV) regressions. We propose a new penalized minimax estimator that can converge to a fixed IV solution. We derive a strong $L$ error rate for our estimator under lax conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T18:08:49Z)
• Conformal Off-Policy Prediction in Contextual Bandits [54.67508891852636]
  Conformal off-policy prediction can output reliable predictive intervals for the outcome under a new target policy. We provide theoretical finite-sample guarantees without making any additional assumptions beyond the standard contextual bandit setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T10:39:33Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• A Huber loss-based super learner with applications to healthcare expenditures [0.0]
  We propose a super learner based on the Huber loss, a "robust" loss function that combines squared error loss with absolute loss to downweight. We show that the proposed method can be used both directly to optimize Huber risk, as well as in finite-sample settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T19:57:50Z)
• Online Selective Classification with Limited Feedback [82.68009460301585]
  We study selective classification in the online learning model, wherein a predictor may abstain from classifying an instance. Two salient aspects of the setting we consider are that the data may be non-realisable, due to which abstention may be a valid long-term action. We construct simple versioning-based schemes for any $mu in (0,1],$ that make most $Tmu$ mistakes while incurring smash$tildeO(T1-mu)$ excess abstention against adaptive adversaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T08:00:53Z)
• The Curse of Passive Data Collection in Batch Reinforcement Learning [82.6026077420886]
  In high stake applications, active experimentation may be considered too risky and thus data are often collected passively. While in simple cases, such as in bandits, passive and active data collection are similarly effective, the price of passive sampling can be much higher when collecting data from a system with controlled states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T07:54:23Z)
• Conditional Selective Inference for Robust Regression and Outlier Detection using Piecewise-Linear Homotopy Continuation [16.443165965475096]
  We consider statistical inference of model estimated after outliers are removed. We show that the proposed conditional SI method is applicable to a wide class of robust regression and outlier detection methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T03:01:18Z)
• LSDAT: Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition for Decision-based Adversarial Attack [74.5144793386864]
  LSDAT crafts perturbations in the low-dimensional subspace formed by the sparse component of the input sample and that of an adversarial sample. LSD works directly in the image pixel domain to guarantee that non-$ell$ constraints, such as sparsity, are satisfied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T13:10:47Z)
• High-Dimensional Feature Selection for Sample Efficient Treatment Effect Estimation [0.0]
  The estimation of causal treatment effects from observational data is a fundamental problem in causal inference. We propose a common objective function involving outcomes across treatment cohorts. We validate our approach with experiments on treatment effect estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T19:54:16Z)
• Valid Causal Inference with (Some) Invalid Instruments [24.794879633855373]
  We show how to perform consistent IV estimation despite violations of the exclusion assumption. We achieve accurate estimates of conditional average treatment effects using an ensemble of deep network-based estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T21:09:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.