Inference-Time Rule Eraser: Fair Recognition via Distilling and Removing Biased Rules

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04814v3
• Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:33:35 GMT
• Title: Inference-Time Rule Eraser: Fair Recognition via Distilling and Removing Biased Rules
• Authors: Yi Zhang, Dongyuan Lu, Jitao Sang,
• Abstract summary: Machine learning models often make predictions based on biased features such as gender, race, and other social attributes. Traditional approaches to addressing this issue involve retraining or fine-tuning neural networks with fairness-aware optimization objectives. We introduce the Inference-Time Rule Eraser (Eraser), a novel method designed to address fairness concerns.
• Score: 16.85221824455542
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning models often make predictions based on biased features such as gender, race, and other social attributes, posing significant fairness risks, especially in societal applications, such as hiring, banking, and criminal justice. Traditional approaches to addressing this issue involve retraining or fine-tuning neural networks with fairness-aware optimization objectives. However, these methods can be impractical due to significant computational resources, complex industrial tests, and the associated CO2 footprint. Additionally, regular users often fail to fine-tune models because they lack access to model parameters In this paper, we introduce the Inference-Time Rule Eraser (Eraser), a novel method designed to address fairness concerns by removing biased decision-making rules from deployed models during inference without altering model weights. We begin by establishing a theoretical foundation for modifying model outputs to eliminate biased rules through Bayesian analysis. Next, we present a specific implementation of Eraser that involves two stages: (1) distilling the biased rules from the deployed model into an additional patch model, and (2) removing these biased rules from the output of the deployed model during inference. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach, showcasing its superior performance in addressing fairness concerns in AI systems.

Related papers

• Bias Begets Bias: The Impact of Biased Embeddings on Diffusion Models [0.0]
  Text-to-Image (TTI) systems have come under increased scrutiny for social biases. We investigate embedding spaces as a source of bias for TTI models. We find that biased multimodal embeddings like CLIP can result in lower alignment scores for representationally balanced TTI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T01:09:55Z)
• Editable Fairness: Fine-Grained Bias Mitigation in Language Models [52.66450426729818]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases. FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance. This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
  Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training. We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z)
• On Regularization and Inference with Label Constraints [62.60903248392479]
  We compare two strategies for encoding label constraints in a machine learning pipeline, regularization with constraints and constrained inference. For regularization, we show that it narrows the generalization gap by precluding models that are inconsistent with the constraints. For constrained inference, we show that it reduces the population risk by correcting a model's violation, and hence turns the violation into an advantage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T03:39:22Z)
• Fair Enough: Standardizing Evaluation and Model Selection for Fairness Research in NLP [64.45845091719002]
  Modern NLP systems exhibit a range of biases, which a growing literature on model debiasing attempts to correct. This paper seeks to clarify the current situation and plot a course for meaningful progress in fair learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T14:54:00Z)
• Fairness Reprogramming [42.65700878967251]
  We propose a new generic fairness learning paradigm, called FairReprogram, which incorporates the model reprogramming technique. Specifically, FairReprogram considers the case where models can not be changed and appends to the input a set of perturbations, called the fairness trigger. We show both theoretically and empirically that the fairness trigger can effectively obscure demographic biases in the output prediction of fixed ML models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T09:37:00Z)
• Fair Inference for Discrete Latent Variable Models [12.558187319452657]
  Machine learning models, trained on data without due care, often exhibit unfair and discriminatory behavior against certain populations. We develop a fair variational inference technique for the discrete latent variables, which is accomplished by including a fairness penalty on the variational distribution. To demonstrate the generality of our approach and its potential for real-world impact, we then develop a special-purpose graphical model for criminal justice risk assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T04:54:21Z)
• Model-agnostic bias mitigation methods with regressor distribution control for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics [0.6509758931804478]
  We propose a bias mitigation methodology based upon the construction of post-processed models with fairer regressor distributions. Our novel methodology performs optimization in low-dimensional spaces and avoids expensive model retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T17:31:22Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them [111.17078939377313]
  State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models often learn to model dataset biases and surface form correlations instead of features that target the intended task. Previous work has demonstrated effective methods to circumvent these issues when knowledge of the bias is available. We show a method for training models that learn to ignore these problematic correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T16:10:54Z)
• Counterfactual fairness: removing direct effects through regularization [0.0]
  We propose a new definition of fairness that incorporates causality through the Controlled Direct Effect (CDE) We develop regularizations to tackle classical fairness measures and present a causal regularization that satisfies our new fairness definition. Our results were found to mitigate unfairness from the predictions with small reductions in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T10:13:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.