XL$^2$Bench: A Benchmark for Extremely Long Context Understanding with Long-range Dependencies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05446v1
• Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:29:07 GMT
• Title: XL$^2$Bench: A Benchmark for Extremely Long Context Understanding with Long-range Dependencies
• Authors: Xuanfan Ni, Hengyi Cai, Xiaochi Wei, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Piji Li,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks but are constrained by their small context window sizes. Various efforts have been proposed to expand the context window to accommodate even up to 200K input tokens. We introduce a benchmark for extremely long context understanding with long-range dependencies, XL$2$Bench.
• Score: 45.31042312867939
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks but are constrained by their small context window sizes. Various efforts have been proposed to expand the context window to accommodate even up to 200K input tokens. Meanwhile, building high-quality benchmarks with much longer text lengths and more demanding tasks to provide comprehensive evaluations is of immense practical interest to facilitate long context understanding research of LLMs. However, prior benchmarks create datasets that ostensibly cater to long-text comprehension by expanding the input of traditional tasks, which falls short to exhibit the unique characteristics of long-text understanding, including long dependency tasks and longer text length compatible with modern LLMs' context window size. In this paper, we introduce a benchmark for extremely long context understanding with long-range dependencies, XL$^2$Bench, which includes three scenarios: Fiction Reading, Paper Reading, and Law Reading, and four tasks of increasing complexity: Memory Retrieval, Detailed Understanding, Overall Understanding, and Open-ended Generation, covering 27 subtasks in English and Chinese. It has an average length of 100K+ words (English) and 200K+ characters (Chinese). Evaluating six leading LLMs on XL$^2$Bench, we find that their performance significantly lags behind human levels. Moreover, the observed decline in performance across both the original and enhanced datasets underscores the efficacy of our approach to mitigating data contamination.

Related papers

• NeedleBench: Can LLMs Do Retrieval and Reasoning in 1 Million Context Window? [37.64593022203498]
  NeedleBench is a framework consisting of progressively more challenging tasks for assessing bilingual long-context capabilities. We use the framework to assess how well the leading open-source models can identify key information relevant to the question. We propose the Ancestral Trace Challenge to mimic the complexity of logical reasoning challenges that are likely to be present in real-world long-context tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:59:06Z)
• Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA [71.04146366608904]
  Long-context modeling capabilities have garnered widespread attention, leading to the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) with ultra-context windows. We propose a novel long-context benchmark, Loong, aligning with realistic scenarios through extended multi-document question answering (QA) Loong introduces four types of tasks with a range of context lengths: Spotlight Locating, Comparison, Clustering, and Chain of Reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T09:42:56Z)
• Ada-LEval: Evaluating long-context LLMs with length-adaptable benchmarks [76.43527940649939]
  We introduce Ada-LEval, a benchmark for evaluating the long-context understanding of large language models (LLMs) Ada-LEval includes two challenging subsets, TSort and BestAnswer, which enable a more reliable evaluation of LLMs' long context capabilities. We evaluate 4 state-of-the-art closed-source API models and 6 open-source models with Ada-LEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T17:30:48Z)
• NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens [63.7488938083696]
  NovelQA is a benchmark designed to test the capabilities of Large Language Models with extended texts. This paper presents the design and construction of NovelQA, highlighting its manual annotation, and diverse question types. Our evaluation of Long-context LLMs on NovelQA reveals significant insights into the models' performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:32:32Z)
• $\infty$Bench: Extending Long Context Evaluation Beyond 100K Tokens [64.08660301017302]
  There is currently a lack of a standardized benchmark to evaluate this long-context capability. $infty$Bench is the first benchmark featuring an average data length surpassing 100K tokens. The results indicate that existing long context LLMs still require significant advancements to effectively process 100K+ context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T11:30:29Z)
• LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts? [46.143956498529796]
  LooGLE is a benchmark for large language models' long context understanding. It features relatively new documents post-2022, with over 24,000 tokens per document and 6,000 newly generated questions spanning diverse domains. The evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs on LooGLE revealed key findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T01:45:37Z)
• LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding [58.20031627237889]
  LongBench is the first bilingual, multi-task benchmark for long context understanding. It comprises 21 datasets across 6 task categories in both English and Chinese, with an average length of 6,711 words (English) and 13,386 characters (Chinese)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T11:53:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.