Decisioning Workshop 2023

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05495v1
• Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:17:23 GMT
• Title: Decisioning Workshop 2023
• Authors: Mario Lezoche, Sanabria Freddy Muñoz, Collazos Cesar, Torres Diego, Agredo Vanessa, Ruiz Pablo, Hurtado Julio,
• Abstract summary: In a knowledge society, the term knowledge must be considered a core resource for organizations. Sharing knowledge ensures its retention and catalyzes the construction of this consensus. Our vision of collaborative decision-making aims not only at increasing the quality of the first parts of the decision-making process.
• Score: 0.3769303106863454
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In a knowledge society, the term knowledge must be considered a core resource for organizations. So, beyond being a medium to progress and to innovate, knowledge is one of our most important resources: something necessary to decide.Organizations that are embracing knowledge retention activities are gaining a competitive advantage. Organizational rearrangements from companies, notably outsourcing, increase a possible loss of knowledge, making knowledge retention an essential need for them. When Knowledge is less shared, collaborative decision-making seems harder to obtain insofar as a ``communication breakdown'' characterizes participants' discourse. At best, stakeholders have to finda consensus according to their knowledge. Sharing knowledge ensures its retention and catalyzes the construction of this consensus. Our vision of collaborative decision-making aims not only at increasing the quality of the first parts of the decision-making process: intelligence and design, but also at increasing the acceptance of the choice. Intelligence and design will be done by more than one individual and constructed together; the decision is more easily accepted. The decided choice will then be shared. Thereby where decision-making could be seen as a constructed model, collaborative decision-making, for us,is seen as the use of socio-technical media to improve decision-making performance and acceptability. The shared decision making is a core activity in a lot of human activities. For example, the sustainable decision-making is the job of not only governments and institutions but also broader society. Recognizing the urgent need for sustainability, we can argue that to realize sustainable development, it must be considered as a decision-making strategy. The location of knowledge in the realization of collaborative decision-making has to be regarded insofar as knowledge sharing leads to improve collaborative decision-making: a ``static view'' has to be structured and constitutes the ``collaborative knowledge.'' Knowledge has an important role in individual decision-making, and we consider that for collaborative decision-making, knowledge has to be shared. What is required is a better understanding of the nature of group work''. Knowledge has to be shared, but how do we share knowledge?

Related papers

• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
  Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks. However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge. We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z)
• ChoiceMates: Supporting Unfamiliar Online Decision-Making with Multi-Agent Conversational Interactions [58.71970923420007]
  We present ChoiceMates, a system that enables conversations with a dynamic set of LLM-powered agents. Agents, as opinionated personas, flexibly join the conversation, not only providing responses but also conversing among themselves to elicit each agent's preferences. Our study (n=36) comparing ChoiceMates to conventional web search and single-agent showed that ChoiceMates was more helpful in discovering, diving deeper, and managing information compared to Web with higher confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T16:49:39Z)
• Pitfalls in Effective Knowledge Management: Insights from an International Information Technology Organization [8.847473225998908]
  This study aims to identify hindering factors that prevent individuals from effectively sharing and managing knowledge. Several hindering factors were identified, grouped into personal social topics, organizational social topics, technical topics, environmental topics, and interrelated social and technical topics. The presented recommendations for mitigating these hindering factors are focused on improving employees' actions, such as offering training and guidelines to follow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T09:45:08Z)
• CIKQA: Learning Commonsense Inference with a Unified Knowledge-in-the-loop QA Paradigm [120.98789964518562]
  We argue that due to the large scale of commonsense knowledge, it is infeasible to annotate a large enough training set for each task to cover all commonsense for learning. We focus on investigating models' commonsense inference capabilities from two perspectives. We name the benchmark as Commonsense Inference with Knowledge-in-the-loop Question Answering (CIKQA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T14:32:39Z)
• Anti-Retroactive Interference for Lifelong Learning [65.50683752919089]
  We design a paradigm for lifelong learning based on meta-learning and associative mechanism of the brain. It tackles the problem from two aspects: extracting knowledge and memorizing knowledge. It is theoretically analyzed that the proposed learning paradigm can make the models of different tasks converge to the same optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T09:27:36Z)
• A Justice-Based Framework for the Analysis of Algorithmic Fairness-Utility Trade-Offs [0.0]
  In prediction-based decision-making systems, different perspectives can be at odds. The short-term business goals of the decision makers are often in conflict with the decision subjects' wish to be treated fairly. We propose a framework to make these value-laden choices clearly visible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T20:31:55Z)
• Knowledge Management Strategies and Emerging Technologies -- An Overview Of the Underpinning Concepts [0.0]
  Knowledge management plays an increasingly important role in global economic development. Numerous leading social scientists in this field have asserted that organisational knowledge should be regarded as a strategic asset. In order to remain relevant in the modern world, organisations should not ignore knowledge management and emerging technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T14:33:31Z)
• Uncertainty quantification and exploration-exploitation trade-off in humans [0.0]
  The main objective of this paper is to outline a theoretical framework to analyse how humans' decision-making strategies under uncertainty manage the trade-off between information gathering (exploration) and reward seeking (exploitation)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T16:03:04Z)
• From climate change to pandemics: decision science can help scientists have impact [2.2768021440549164]
  Decision science aims to pinpoint evidence-based management strategies. It brings together mathematical modelling, stakeholder values and logistical constraints to support decision making. The COVID-19 pandemic has thrust mathematical models into the public spotlight, but it is one of innumerable examples in which modelling informs decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T00:51:31Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.