Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06955v1
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:12:50 GMT
- Title: Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment
- Authors: Antonette Shibani, Simon Knight, Kirsty Kitto, Ajanie Karunanayake, Simon Buckingham Shum,
- Abstract summary: Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills.
This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI.
Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
- Score: 2.8078480738404
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a ubiquitous part of society, but a key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills to interact with machines effectively by understanding their capabilities and limitations. These skills are particularly important for learners to develop in the age of generative AI where AI tools can demonstrate complex knowledge and ability previously thought to be uniquely human. To activate effective human-AI partnerships in writing, this paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI. Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process. We believe that the outcomes can lead to better task and tool design in the future for learners to develop deep, critical thinking when interacting with AI.
Related papers
- Immersion for AI: Immersive Learning with Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
This work reflects upon what Immersion can mean from the perspective of an Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Applying the lens of immersive learning theory, it seeks to understand whether this new perspective supports ways for AI participation in cognitive ecologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-05T11:51:02Z) - The AI Interface: Designing for the Ideal Machine-Human Experience (Editorial) [1.8074330674710588]
This editorial introduces a Special Issue that explores the psychology of AI experience design.
Papers in this collection highlight the complexities of trust, transparency, and emotional sensitivity in human-AI interaction.
By findings from eight diverse studies, this editorial underscores the need for AI interfaces to balance efficiency with empathy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T15:17:32Z) - Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.
The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming.
A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z) - Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom.
While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems.
We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Shifting the Human-AI Relationship: Toward a Dynamic Relational Learning-Partner Model [0.0]
We advocate for a shift toward viewing AI as a learning partner, akin to a student who learns from interactions with humans.
We suggest that a "third mind" emerges through collaborative human-AI relationships.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T19:19:39Z) - The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Vision for Hybrid Intelligence [0.45207442500313766]
I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualisation of AI as tools, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI.
I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning.
The paper presents three unique conceptualisations of AI: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human mental models, and the extension of human cognition via tightly coupled human-AI hybrid intelligence systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-24T10:07:46Z) - A call for embodied AI [1.7544885995294304]
We propose Embodied AI as the next fundamental step in the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence.
By broadening the scope of Embodied AI, we introduce a theoretical framework based on cognitive architectures.
This framework is aligned with Friston's active inference principle, offering a comprehensive approach to EAI development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T09:11:20Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of
AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains.
Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.