Black-box Adversarial Transferability: An Empirical Study in Cybersecurity Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10796v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:56:28 GMT
• Title: Black-box Adversarial Transferability: An Empirical Study in Cybersecurity Perspective
• Authors: Khushnaseeb Roshan, Aasim Zafar,
• Abstract summary: In adversarial machine learning, malicious users try to fool the deep learning model by inserting adversarial perturbation inputs into the model during its training or testing phase. We empirically test the black-box adversarial transferability phenomena in cyber attack detection systems. The results indicate that any deep learning model is highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, even if the attacker does not have access to the internal details of the target model.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence within the realm of cybersecurity raises significant security concerns. The vulnerability of deep learning models in adversarial attacks is one of the major issues. In adversarial machine learning, malicious users try to fool the deep learning model by inserting adversarial perturbation inputs into the model during its training or testing phase. Subsequently, it reduces the model confidence score and results in incorrect classifications. The novel key contribution of the research is to empirically test the black-box adversarial transferability phenomena in cyber attack detection systems. It indicates that the adversarial perturbation input generated through the surrogate model has a similar impact on the target model in producing the incorrect classification. To empirically validate this phenomenon, surrogate and target models are used. The adversarial perturbation inputs are generated based on the surrogate-model for which the hacker has complete information. Based on these adversarial perturbation inputs, both surrogate and target models are evaluated during the inference phase. We have done extensive experimentation over the CICDDoS-2019 dataset, and the results are classified in terms of various performance metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score. The findings indicate that any deep learning model is highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, even if the attacker does not have access to the internal details of the target model. The results also indicate that white-box adversarial attacks have a severe impact compared to black-box adversarial attacks. There is a need to investigate and explore adversarial defence techniques to increase the robustness of the deep learning models against adversarial attacks.

Related papers

• Undermining Image and Text Classification Algorithms Using Adversarial Attacks [0.0]
  Our study addresses the gap by training various machine learning models and using GANs and SMOTE to generate additional data points aimed at attacking text classification models. Our experiments reveal a significant vulnerability in classification models. Specifically, we observe a 20 % decrease in accuracy for the top-performing text classification models post-attack, along with a 30 % decrease in facial recognition accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T18:44:28Z)
• MOREL: Enhancing Adversarial Robustness through Multi-Objective Representation Learning [1.534667887016089]
  deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to slight adversarial perturbations. We show that strong feature representation learning during training can significantly enhance the original model's robustness. We propose MOREL, a multi-objective feature representation learning approach, encouraging classification models to produce similar features for inputs within the same class, despite perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T16:05:03Z)
• Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations [54.39726653562144]
  Our study explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets. We identify human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T22:31:29Z)
• Designing an attack-defense game: how to increase robustness of financial transaction models via a competition [69.08339915577206]
  Given the escalating risks of malicious attacks in the finance sector, understanding adversarial strategies and robust defense mechanisms for machine learning models is critical. We aim to investigate the current state and dynamics of adversarial attacks and defenses for neural network models that use sequential financial data as the input. We have designed a competition that allows realistic and detailed investigation of problems in modern financial transaction data. The participants compete directly against each other, so possible attacks and defenses are examined in close-to-real-life conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T12:53:09Z)
• Analyzing the Impact of Adversarial Examples on Explainable Machine Learning [0.31498833540989407]
  Adversarial attacks are a type of attack on machine learning models where an attacker deliberately modifies the inputs to cause the model to make incorrect predictions. Work on the vulnerability of deep learning models to adversarial attacks has shown that it is very easy to make samples that make a model predict things that it doesn't want to. In this work, we analyze the impact of model interpretability due to adversarial attacks on text classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T08:50:36Z)
• Order-Disorder: Imitation Adversarial Attacks for Black-box Neural Ranking Models [48.93128542994217]
  We propose an imitation adversarial attack on black-box neural passage ranking models. We show that the target passage ranking model can be transparentized and imitated by enumerating critical queries/candidates. We also propose an innovative gradient-based attack method, empowered by the pairwise objective function, to generate adversarial triggers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T09:10:07Z)
• Membership-Doctor: Comprehensive Assessment of Membership Inference Against Machine Learning Models [11.842337448801066]
  We present a large-scale measurement of different membership inference attacks and defenses. We find that some assumptions of the threat model, such as same-architecture and same-distribution between shadow and target models, are unnecessary. We are also the first to execute attacks on the real-world data collected from the Internet, instead of laboratory datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T17:00:53Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)
• Mitigating the Impact of Adversarial Attacks in Very Deep Networks [10.555822166916705]
  Deep Neural Network (DNN) models have vulnerabilities related to security concerns. Data poisoning-enabled perturbation attacks are complex adversarial ones that inject false data into models. We propose an attack-agnostic-based defense method for mitigating their influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T21:25:44Z)
• Two Sides of the Same Coin: White-box and Black-box Attacks for Transfer Learning [60.784641458579124]
  We show that fine-tuning effectively enhances model robustness under white-box FGSM attacks. We also propose a black-box attack method for transfer learning models which attacks the target model with the adversarial examples produced by its source model. To systematically measure the effect of both white-box and black-box attacks, we propose a new metric to evaluate how transferable are the adversarial examples produced by a source model to a target model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-25T15:04:32Z)
• Adversarial Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning [62.17538130778111]
  Existing adversarial learning approaches mostly use class labels to generate adversarial samples that lead to incorrect predictions. We propose a novel adversarial attack for unlabeled data, which makes the model confuse the instance-level identities of the perturbed data samples. We present a self-supervised contrastive learning framework to adversarially train a robust neural network without labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T08:24:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.