Student self-management, academic achievement: Exploring the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating influence of gender insights from a survey conducted in 3 universities in America
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11029v1
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 03:10:29 GMT
- Title: Student self-management, academic achievement: Exploring the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating influence of gender insights from a survey conducted in 3 universities in America
- Authors: Zhiqiang Zhao, Ping Ren, Qian Yang,
- Abstract summary: This study aims to explore the relationship between student self-management and academic achievement.
A total of 289 students from three universities in the United States participated in this research.
- Score: 22.187608859037574
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Excellent students are not only those who master more effective and efficient learning techniques to acquire and apply information. Even in the absence of correct learning, they are able to self-motivate, evaluate, and adjust their behavior. This study aims to explore the relationship between student self-management and academic achievement, with a focus on investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating influence of gender in this relationship. A total of 289 students from three universities in the United States participated in this research. The results of the study indicate that students' level of self-management is positively correlated with their academic achievement, with self-efficacy playing a mediating role in this relationship and gender exerting a certain moderating effect. This study provides important insights into understanding the relationship between student self-management and academic achievement and supports the crucial role of educational leaders in educational practice.
Related papers
- Exploring Factors Affecting Student Learning Satisfaction during COVID-19 in South Korea [0.0]
This study aimed to understand several facets related to student learning preferences and satisfaction during the pandemic.
Data gathered included students' gender, study major, satisfaction and motivation levels when learning, perceived performance, emotional state and learning environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T14:28:11Z) - Have Learning Analytics Dashboards Lived Up to the Hype? A Systematic
Review of Impact on Students' Achievement, Motivation, Participation and
Attitude [0.0]
There is no evidence to support the conclusion that learning analytics dashboards (LADs) have lived up to the promise of improving academic achievement.
LADs showed a relatively substantial impact on student participation.
To advance the research line for LADs, researchers should use rigorous assessment methods and establish clear standards for evaluating learning constructs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T20:12:52Z) - Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when
rewards are not observable [58.762004496858836]
Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others' successes.
We suggest that social inference capacities may help bridge this gap, allowing individuals to update their beliefs about others' underlying knowledge and success from observable trajectories of behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-01T21:04:03Z) - Exploring the Confounding Factors of Academic Career Success: An
Empirical Study with Deep Predictive Modeling [43.91066315776696]
We propose to explore the determinants of academic career success through an empirical and predictive modeling perspective.
We analyze the co-author network and find that potential scholars work closely with influential scholars early on and more closely as they grow.
We find that being a Fellow could not bring the improvements of citations and productivity growth.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-19T08:16:21Z) - Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through
collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities.
We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA.
Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z) - Academic Support Network Reflects Doctoral Experience and Productivity [1.6317061277457]
Acknowledgements in dissertations reflect the student experience and provide an opportunity to thank the people who support them.
We conduct textual analysis of acknowledgments to build the "academic support network"
Our results indicate the importance of academic support networks by explaining how they differ and how they influence productivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-07T14:25:44Z) - How Does a Student-Centered Course on Communication and Professional
Skills Impact Students in the Long Run? [0.0]
This paper presents a long-term study about the effects of a student-centered course on students' thoughts, attitudes, and behavior.
The course is offered at a European university as part of a computer science master's program.
Our findings suggest that the course provided significant learning for the vast majority of respondents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-04T10:51:40Z) - Relationship between Student Engagement and Performance in e-Learning
Environment Using Association Rules [9.006364242523249]
One of the challenges facing e-learning platforms is how to keep students motivated and engaged.
This paper tries to investigate the relationship between student engagement and their academic performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-25T17:00:23Z) - Social Engagement versus Learning Engagement -- An Exploratory Study of
FutureLearn Learners [61.58283466715385]
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) continue to see increasing enrolment, but only a small percent of enrolees completes the MOOCs.
This study is particularly concerned with how learners interact with peers, along with their study progression in MOOCs.
The study was conducted on the less explored FutureLearn platform, which employs a social constructivist approach and promotes collaborative learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-11T16:09:10Z) - Dual Policy Distillation [58.43610940026261]
Policy distillation, which transfers a teacher policy to a student policy, has achieved great success in challenging tasks of deep reinforcement learning.
In this work, we introduce dual policy distillation(DPD), a student-student framework in which two learners operate on the same environment to explore different perspectives of the environment.
The key challenge in developing this dual learning framework is to identify the beneficial knowledge from the peer learner for contemporary learning-based reinforcement learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-07T06:49:47Z) - Intrinsic Motivation for Encouraging Synergistic Behavior [55.10275467562764]
We study the role of intrinsic motivation as an exploration bias for reinforcement learning in sparse-reward synergistic tasks.
Our key idea is that a good guiding principle for intrinsic motivation in synergistic tasks is to take actions which affect the world in ways that would not be achieved if the agents were acting on their own.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-12T19:34:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.