Have Learning Analytics Dashboards Lived Up to the Hype? A Systematic Review of Impact on Students' Achievement, Motivation, Participation and Attitude

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15042v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 20:12:52 GMT
• Title: Have Learning Analytics Dashboards Lived Up to the Hype? A Systematic Review of Impact on Students' Achievement, Motivation, Participation and Attitude
• Authors: Rogers Kaliisa, Kamila Misiejuk, Sonsoles L\'opez-Pernas, Mohammad Khalil, Mohammed Saqr
• Abstract summary: There is no evidence to support the conclusion that learning analytics dashboards (LADs) have lived up to the promise of improving academic achievement. LADs showed a relatively substantial impact on student participation. To advance the research line for LADs, researchers should use rigorous assessment methods and establish clear standards for evaluating learning constructs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While learning analytics dashboards (LADs) are the most common form of LA intervention, there is limited evidence regarding their impact on students learning outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes the findings of 38 research studies to investigate the impact of LADs on students' learning outcomes, encompassing achievement, participation, motivation, and attitudes. As we currently stand, there is no evidence to support the conclusion that LADs have lived up to the promise of improving academic achievement. Most studies reported negligible or small effects, with limited evidence from well-powered controlled experiments. Many studies merely compared users and non-users of LADs, confounding the dashboard effect with student engagement levels. Similarly, the impact of LADs on motivation and attitudes appeared modest, with only a few exceptions demonstrating significant effects. Small sample sizes in these studies highlight the need for larger-scale investigations to validate these findings. Notably, LADs showed a relatively substantial impact on student participation. Several studies reported medium to large effect sizes, suggesting that LADs can promote engagement and interaction in online learning environments. However, methodological shortcomings, such as reliance on traditional evaluation methods, self-selection bias, the assumption that access equates to usage, and a lack of standardized assessment tools, emerged as recurring issues. To advance the research line for LADs, researchers should use rigorous assessment methods and establish clear standards for evaluating learning constructs. Such efforts will advance our understanding of the potential of LADs to enhance learning outcomes and provide valuable insights for educators and researchers alike.

Related papers

• Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration [74.09687562334682]
  We introduce a novel training data attribution method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA) Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%. DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T07:14:26Z)
• AI Can Be Cognitively Biased: An Exploratory Study on Threshold Priming in LLM-Based Batch Relevance Assessment [37.985947029716016]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown advanced understanding capabilities but may inherit human biases from their training data. We investigated whether LLMs are influenced by the threshold priming effect in relevance judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T12:23:15Z)
• PICA: A Data-driven Synthesis of Peer Instruction and Continuous Assessment [0.0]
  The work herein combines PI and CA in a deliberate and novel manner to pair students together for a PI session in which they collaborate on a CA task. The motivation for this data-driven collaborative learning is to improve student learning, communication, and engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T20:50:32Z)
• Bayesian Causal Forests for Longitudinal Data: Assessing the Impact of Part-Time Work on Growth in High School Mathematics Achievement [0.0]
  We introduce a longitudinal extension of Bayesian Causal Forests. This model allows for the flexible identification of both individual growth in mathematical ability and the effects of participation in part-time work. Results reveal the negative impact of part time work for most students, but hint at potential benefits for those students with an initially low sense of school belonging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:18:33Z)
• Exploring Factors Affecting Student Learning Satisfaction during COVID-19 in South Korea [0.0]
  This study aimed to understand several facets related to student learning preferences and satisfaction during the pandemic. Data gathered included students' gender, study major, satisfaction and motivation levels when learning, perceived performance, emotional state and learning environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T14:28:11Z)
• Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [58.52919374786108]
  Large language models (LLMs) can estimate causal effects under interventions on different parts of a system. We conduct empirical analyses to evaluate whether LLMs can accurately update their knowledge of a data-generating process in response to an intervention. We create benchmarks that span diverse causal graphs (e.g., confounding, mediation) and variable types, and enable a study of intervention-based reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T14:15:56Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting [64.80538055623842]
  sociodemographic prompting is a technique that steers the output of prompt-based models towards answers that humans with specific sociodemographic profiles would give. We show that sociodemographic information affects model predictions and can be beneficial for improving zero-shot learning in subjective NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T15:42:06Z)
• Susceptibility to Influence of Large Language Models [5.931099001882958]
  Two studies tested the hypothesis that a Large Language Model (LLM) can be used to model psychological change following exposure to influential input. The first study tested a generic mode of influence - the Illusory Truth Effect (ITE) The second study concerns a specific mode of influence - populist framing of news to increase its persuasion and political mobilization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-10T16:53:30Z)
• Social Engagement versus Learning Engagement -- An Exploratory Study of FutureLearn Learners [61.58283466715385]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) continue to see increasing enrolment, but only a small percent of enrolees completes the MOOCs. This study is particularly concerned with how learners interact with peers, along with their study progression in MOOCs. The study was conducted on the less explored FutureLearn platform, which employs a social constructivist approach and promotes collaborative learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T16:09:10Z)
• Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study [69.09570726777817]
  The study of public opinion can provide us with valuable information. The efficiency and accuracy of sentiment analysis is being hindered by the challenges encountered in natural language processing. This paper reviews the latest studies that have employed deep learning to solve sentiment analysis problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T16:28:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.