Protecting Your LLMs with Information Bottleneck
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13968v3
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 13:22:58 GMT
- Title: Protecting Your LLMs with Information Bottleneck
- Authors: Zichuan Liu, Zefan Wang, Linjie Xu, Jinyu Wang, Lei Song, Tianchun Wang, Chunlin Chen, Wei Cheng, Jiang Bian,
- Abstract summary: We introduce the Information Bottleneck Protector (IBProtector), a defense mechanism grounded in the information bottleneck principle.
The IBProtector selectively compresses and perturbs prompts, facilitated by a lightweight and trainable extractor.
Our empirical evaluations show that IBProtector outperforms current defense methods in mitigating jailbreak attempts.
- Score: 20.870610473199125
- License:
- Abstract: The advent of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the field of natural language processing, yet they might be attacked to produce harmful content. Despite efforts to ethically align LLMs, these are often fragile and can be circumvented by jailbreaking attacks through optimized or manual adversarial prompts. To address this, we introduce the Information Bottleneck Protector (IBProtector), a defense mechanism grounded in the information bottleneck principle, and we modify the objective to avoid trivial solutions. The IBProtector selectively compresses and perturbs prompts, facilitated by a lightweight and trainable extractor, preserving only essential information for the target LLMs to respond with the expected answer. Moreover, we further consider a situation where the gradient is not visible to be compatible with any LLM. Our empirical evaluations show that IBProtector outperforms current defense methods in mitigating jailbreak attempts, without overly affecting response quality or inference speed. Its effectiveness and adaptability across various attack methods and target LLMs underscore the potential of IBProtector as a novel, transferable defense that bolsters the security of LLMs without requiring modifications to the underlying models.
Related papers
- LLM-Virus: Evolutionary Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models [59.29840790102413]
Existing jailbreak attacks are primarily based on opaque optimization techniques and gradient search methods.
We propose LLM-Virus, a jailbreak attack method based on evolutionary algorithm, termed evolutionary jailbreak.
Our results show that LLM-Virus achieves competitive or even superior performance compared to existing attack methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-28T07:48:57Z) - Targeting the Core: A Simple and Effective Method to Attack RAG-based Agents via Direct LLM Manipulation [4.241100280846233]
AI agents, powered by large language models (LLMs), have transformed human-computer interactions by enabling seamless, natural, and context-aware communication.
This paper investigates a critical vulnerability: adversarial attacks targeting the LLM core within AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T18:38:30Z) - Harnessing Task Overload for Scalable Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models [8.024771725860127]
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass their safety mechanisms.
We introduce a novel scalable jailbreak attack that preempts the activation of an LLM's safety policies by occupying its computational resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-05T15:10:01Z) - Jailbreaking Large Language Models Through Alignment Vulnerabilities in Out-of-Distribution Settings [57.136748215262884]
We introduce ObscurePrompt for jailbreaking LLMs, inspired by the observed fragile alignments in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) data.
We first formulate the decision boundary in the jailbreaking process and then explore how obscure text affects LLM's ethical decision boundary.
Our approach substantially improves upon previous methods in terms of attack effectiveness, maintaining efficacy against two prevalent defense mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T16:09:58Z) - Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs)
Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs.
Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z) - Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing [14.094372002702476]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications.
Recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts.
We propose a novel defense method termed textbfLayer-specific textbfEditing (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T13:26:12Z) - AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z) - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily [51.63085197162279]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are designed to provide useful and safe responses.
adversarial prompts known as 'jailbreaks' can circumvent safeguards.
We propose ReNeLLM, an automatic framework that leverages LLMs themselves to generate effective jailbreak prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T16:02:16Z) - SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks [99.23352758320945]
We propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks on large language models (LLMs)
Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense first randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T17:01:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.