Massively Annotated Datasets for Assessment of Synthetic and Real Data in Face Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15234v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:10:49 GMT
• Title: Massively Annotated Datasets for Assessment of Synthetic and Real Data in Face Recognition
• Authors: Pedro C. Neto, Rafael M. Mamede, Carolina Albuquerque, Tiago Gonçalves, Ana F. Sequeira,
• Abstract summary: We study the drift between the performance of models trained on real and synthetic datasets. We conduct studies on the differences between real and synthetic datasets on the attribute set. Interestingly enough, we have verified that while real samples suffice to explain the synthetic distribution, the opposite could not be further from being true.
• Score: 0.2775636978045794
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Face recognition applications have grown in parallel with the size of datasets, complexity of deep learning models and computational power. However, while deep learning models evolve to become more capable and computational power keeps increasing, the datasets available are being retracted and removed from public access. Privacy and ethical concerns are relevant topics within these domains. Through generative artificial intelligence, researchers have put efforts into the development of completely synthetic datasets that can be used to train face recognition systems. Nonetheless, the recent advances have not been sufficient to achieve performance comparable to the state-of-the-art models trained on real data. To study the drift between the performance of models trained on real and synthetic datasets, we leverage a massive attribute classifier (MAC) to create annotations for four datasets: two real and two synthetic. From these annotations, we conduct studies on the distribution of each attribute within all four datasets. Additionally, we further inspect the differences between real and synthetic datasets on the attribute set. When comparing through the Kullback-Leibler divergence we have found differences between real and synthetic samples. Interestingly enough, we have verified that while real samples suffice to explain the synthetic distribution, the opposite could not be further from being true.

Related papers

• SAU: A Dual-Branch Network to Enhance Long-Tailed Recognition via Generative Models [9.340077455871736]
  Long-tailed distributions in image recognition pose a considerable challenge due to the severe imbalance between a few dominant classes. Recently, the use of large generative models to create synthetic data for image classification has been realized. We propose the use of synthetic data as a complement to long-tailed datasets to eliminate the impact of data imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T05:33:59Z)
• Exploring the Potential of Synthetic Data to Replace Real Data [16.89582896061033]
  We find that the potential of synthetic data to replace real data varies depending on the number of cross-domain real images and the test set on which the trained model is evaluated. We introduce two new metrics, the train2test distance and $textAP_textt2t$, to evaluate the ability of a cross-domain training set using synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T18:20:18Z)
• Mind the Gap Between Synthetic and Real: Utilizing Transfer Learning to Probe the Boundaries of Stable Diffusion Generated Data [2.6016285265085526]
  Student models show a significant drop in accuracy compared to models trained on real data. By training these layers using either real or synthetic data, we reveal that the drop mainly stems from the model's final layers. Our results suggest an improved trade-off between the amount of real training data used and the model's accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T07:51:13Z)
• Learning Defect Prediction from Unrealistic Data [57.53586547895278]
  Pretrained models of code have become popular choices for code understanding and generation tasks. Such models tend to be large and require commensurate volumes of training data. It has become popular to train models with far larger but less realistic datasets, such as functions with artificially injected bugs. Models trained on such data tend to only perform well on similar data, while underperforming on real world programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:51:43Z)
• Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
  Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models. ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task. This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z)
• Exploring the Effectiveness of Dataset Synthesis: An application of Apple Detection in Orchards [68.95806641664713]
  We explore the usability of Stable Diffusion 2.1-base for generating synthetic datasets of apple trees for object detection. We train a YOLOv5m object detection model to predict apples in a real-world apple detection dataset. Results demonstrate that the model trained on generated data is slightly underperforming compared to a baseline model trained on real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T09:46:01Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Synthetic-to-Real Domain Adaptation for Action Recognition: A Dataset and Baseline Performances [76.34037366117234]
  We introduce a new dataset called Robot Control Gestures (RoCoG-v2) The dataset is composed of both real and synthetic videos from seven gesture classes. We present results using state-of-the-art action recognition and domain adaptation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T23:23:55Z)
• A New Benchmark: On the Utility of Synthetic Data with Blender for Bare Supervised Learning and Downstream Domain Adaptation [42.2398858786125]
  Deep learning in computer vision has achieved great success with the price of large-scale labeled training data. The uncontrollable data collection process produces non-IID training and test data, where undesired duplication may exist. To circumvent them, an alternative is to generate synthetic data via 3D rendering with domain randomization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T09:03:52Z)
• TRoVE: Transforming Road Scene Datasets into Photorealistic Virtual Environments [84.6017003787244]
  This work proposes a synthetic data generation pipeline to address the difficulties and domain-gaps present in simulated datasets. We show that using annotations and visual cues from existing datasets, we can facilitate automated multi-modal data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-16T20:46:08Z)
• Fake It Till You Make It: Face analysis in the wild using synthetic data alone [9.081019005437309]
  We show that it is possible to perform face-related computer vision in the wild using synthetic data alone. We describe how to combine a procedurally-generated 3D face model with a comprehensive library of hand-crafted assets to render training images with unprecedented realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T13:07:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.