Mind the Gap Between Synthetic and Real: Utilizing Transfer Learning to Probe the Boundaries of Stable Diffusion Generated Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03243v1
• Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 07:51:13 GMT
• Title: Mind the Gap Between Synthetic and Real: Utilizing Transfer Learning to Probe the Boundaries of Stable Diffusion Generated Data
• Authors: Leonhard Hennicke, Christian Medeiros Adriano, Holger Giese, Jan Mathias Koehler, Lukas Schott,
• Abstract summary: Student models show a significant drop in accuracy compared to models trained on real data. By training these layers using either real or synthetic data, we reveal that the drop mainly stems from the model's final layers. Our results suggest an improved trade-off between the amount of real training data used and the model's accuracy.
• Score: 2.6016285265085526
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative foundation models like Stable Diffusion comprise a diverse spectrum of knowledge in computer vision with the potential for transfer learning, e.g., via generating data to train student models for downstream tasks. This could circumvent the necessity of collecting labeled real-world data, thereby presenting a form of data-free knowledge distillation. However, the resultant student models show a significant drop in accuracy compared to models trained on real data. We investigate possible causes for this drop and focus on the role of the different layers of the student model. By training these layers using either real or synthetic data, we reveal that the drop mainly stems from the model's final layers. Further, we briefly investigate other factors, such as differences in data-normalization between synthetic and real, the impact of data augmentations, texture vs.\ shape learning, and assuming oracle prompts. While we find that some of those factors can have an impact, they are not sufficient to close the gap towards real data. Building upon our insights that mainly later layers are responsible for the drop, we investigate the data-efficiency of fine-tuning a synthetically trained model with real data applied to only those last layers. Our results suggest an improved trade-off between the amount of real training data used and the model's accuracy. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the gap between synthetic and real data and indicate solutions to mitigate the scarcity of labeled real data.

Related papers

• Massively Annotated Datasets for Assessment of Synthetic and Real Data in Face Recognition [0.2775636978045794]
  We study the drift between the performance of models trained on real and synthetic datasets. We conduct studies on the differences between real and synthetic datasets on the attribute set. Interestingly enough, we have verified that while real samples suffice to explain the synthetic distribution, the opposite could not be further from being true.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T17:10:49Z)
• Object Detector Differences when using Synthetic and Real Training Data [0.0]
  We train the YOLOv3 object detector on real and synthetic images from city environments. We perform a similarity analysis using Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) to explore the effects of training on synthetic data on a layer-wise basis. The results show that the largest similarity between a detector trained on real data and a detector trained on synthetic data was in the early layers, and the largest difference was in the head part.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T16:27:48Z)
• Learning Defect Prediction from Unrealistic Data [57.53586547895278]
  Pretrained models of code have become popular choices for code understanding and generation tasks. Such models tend to be large and require commensurate volumes of training data. It has become popular to train models with far larger but less realistic datasets, such as functions with artificially injected bugs. Models trained on such data tend to only perform well on similar data, while underperforming on real world programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:51:43Z)
• Exploring the Effectiveness of Dataset Synthesis: An application of Apple Detection in Orchards [68.95806641664713]
  We explore the usability of Stable Diffusion 2.1-base for generating synthetic datasets of apple trees for object detection. We train a YOLOv5m object detection model to predict apples in a real-world apple detection dataset. Results demonstrate that the model trained on generated data is slightly underperforming compared to a baseline model trained on real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T09:46:01Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Knowing the Distance: Understanding the Gap Between Synthetic and Real Data For Face Parsing [0.0]
  We show that the distribution gap is the largest contributor to the performance gap, accounting for over 50% of the gap. This suggests that synthetic data is a viable alternative to real data, especially when real data is limited or difficult to obtain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T13:59:26Z)
• A New Benchmark: On the Utility of Synthetic Data with Blender for Bare Supervised Learning and Downstream Domain Adaptation [42.2398858786125]
  Deep learning in computer vision has achieved great success with the price of large-scale labeled training data. The uncontrollable data collection process produces non-IID training and test data, where undesired duplication may exist. To circumvent them, an alternative is to generate synthetic data via 3D rendering with domain randomization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T09:03:52Z)
• Minimizing the Accumulated Trajectory Error to Improve Dataset Distillation [151.70234052015948]
  We propose a novel approach that encourages the optimization algorithm to seek a flat trajectory. We show that the weights trained on synthetic data are robust against the accumulated errors perturbations with the regularization towards the flat trajectory. Our method, called Flat Trajectory Distillation (FTD), is shown to boost the performance of gradient-matching methods by up to 4.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-20T15:49:11Z)
• A Scaling Law for Synthetic-to-Real Transfer: A Measure of Pre-Training [52.93808218720784]
  Synthetic-to-real transfer learning is a framework in which we pre-train models with synthetically generated images and ground-truth annotations for real tasks. Although synthetic images overcome the data scarcity issue, it remains unclear how the fine-tuning performance scales with pre-trained models. We observe a simple and general scaling law that consistently describes learning curves in various tasks, models, and complexities of synthesized pre-training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-25T02:29:28Z)
• Contrastive Model Inversion for Data-Free Knowledge Distillation [60.08025054715192]
  We propose Contrastive Model Inversion, where the data diversity is explicitly modeled as an optimizable objective. Our main observation is that, under the constraint of the same amount of data, higher data diversity usually indicates stronger instance discrimination. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet demonstrate that CMI achieves significantly superior performance when the generated data are used for knowledge distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T15:13:00Z)
• STAN: Synthetic Network Traffic Generation with Generative Neural Models [10.54843182184416]
  This paper presents STAN (Synthetic network Traffic generation with Autoregressive Neural models), a tool to generate realistic synthetic network traffic datasets. Our novel neural architecture captures both temporal dependencies and dependence between attributes at any given time. We evaluate the performance of STAN in terms of the quality of data generated, by training it on both a simulated dataset and a real network traffic data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T04:20:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.