Global Trends in Cryptocurrency Regulation: An Overview
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15895v2
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 13:21:19 GMT
- Title: Global Trends in Cryptocurrency Regulation: An Overview
- Authors: Xihan Xiong, Junliang Luo,
- Abstract summary: The global landscape of cryptocurrency regulation remains complex, marked by substantial variations in regulatory frameworks among different countries.
This paper aims to study these differences by investigating the regulatory landscapes across various jurisdictions.
We first discuss regulatory challenges and considerations, then conduct a comparative analysis of international regulatory stances, approaches, and measures.
- Score: 0.3222802562733787
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Cryptocurrencies have evolved into an important asset class, providing a variety of benefits. However, they also present significant risks, such as market volatility and the potential for misuse in illegal activities. These risks underline the urgent need for a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure consumer protection, market integrity, and financial stability. Yet, the global landscape of cryptocurrency regulation remains complex, marked by substantial variations in regulatory frameworks among different countries. This paper aims to study these differences by investigating the regulatory landscapes across various jurisdictions. We first discuss regulatory challenges and considerations, and then conduct a comparative analysis of international regulatory stances, approaches, and measures. We hope our study offers practical insights to enhance the understanding of global trends in cryptocurrency regulation.
Related papers
- Mapping the Scholarship of Dark Pattern Regulation: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Regulatory Paradigms, and Solutions from an Interdisciplinary Perspective [7.529549026367749]
This study synthesises the unique trends and characteristics of legal scholarship on dark patterns, identifying five root problems and triple layered harms.
It critiques current regulations in terms of legal theories and sectoral legislations, highlighting their connotation in addressing dark patterns.
This research critically discusses the current barriers to effective dark pattern regulations and explores promising regulatory solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-14T21:41:18Z) - Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety.
A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology.
This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Law [65.87885628115946]
Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the landscapes of finance, healthcare, and law.
We highlight the instrumental role of LLMs in enhancing diagnostic and treatment methodologies in healthcare, innovating financial analytics, and refining legal interpretation and compliance strategies.
We critically examine the ethics for LLM applications in these fields, pointing out the existing ethical concerns and the need for transparent, fair, and robust AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T22:43:02Z) - Examining the Legal Status of Digital Assets as Property: A Comparative Analysis of Jurisdictional Approaches [0.0]
This paper examines the complex legal landscape surrounding digital assets, analysing how they are defined and regulated as property across various jurisdictions.
As digital assets such as cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) increasingly integrate with global economies, their intangible nature presents unique challenges to traditional property law concepts.
This research presents a comparative analysis, reviewing how different legal systems classify and manage digital assets within property law.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T04:22:30Z) - The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage.
Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z) - Legal NLP Meets MiCAR: Advancing the Analysis of Crypto White Papers [0.0]
White papers in the field of crypto assets are now subject to unprecedented content requirements under the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR)
Natural Language Processing can serve as a powerful tool for both analyzing these documents and assisting in regulatory compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T12:17:11Z) - Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields.
We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z) - A Comprehensive Review and Systematic Analysis of Artificial
Intelligence Regulation Policies [1.637145148171519]
We present a comprehensive review of AI regulation proposals from different geographical locations and cultural backgrounds.
We then perform a systematic analysis of these AI regulation proposals to understand how each proposal may fail.
This study aims to help governing bodies untangling the AI regulatory chaos through a divide-and-conquer manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-23T03:44:03Z) - Both eyes open: Vigilant Incentives help Regulatory Markets improve AI
Safety [69.59465535312815]
Regulatory Markets for AI is a proposal designed with adaptability in mind.
It involves governments setting outcome-based targets for AI companies to achieve.
We warn that it is alarmingly easy to stumble on incentives which would prevent Regulatory Markets from achieving this goal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T14:42:05Z) - Risk-based regulation for all: The need and a method for a wide adoption
solution for data-driven inspection targeting [0.0]
This article discusses the need and the difficulties for the development of solutions for market monitoring and inspection targeting in a data-driven way.
It presents an effective method to address regulation planning, and illustrates its use to account for the most important and common subject for regulators: the consumer.
It hopes to contribute to increase the awareness of the regulatory community to the need for data processing methods that are objective, impartial, transparent, explainable, simple to implement and with low computational cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-07T16:59:04Z) - Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless -
justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks.
We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities.
We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.