Evaluation of Geographical Distortions in Language Models: A Crucial Step Towards Equitable Representations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17401v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:22:28 GMT
• Title: Evaluation of Geographical Distortions in Language Models: A Crucial Step Towards Equitable Representations
• Authors: Rémy Decoupes, Roberto Interdonato, Mathieu Roche, Maguelonne Teisseire, Sarah Valentin,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on biases related to geographical knowledge. We explore the connection between geography and language models by highlighting their tendency to misrepresent spatial information.
• Score: 2.825324306665133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Language models now constitute essential tools for improving efficiency for many professional tasks such as writing, coding, or learning. For this reason, it is imperative to identify inherent biases. In the field of Natural Language Processing, five sources of bias are well-identified: data, annotation, representation, models, and research design. This study focuses on biases related to geographical knowledge. We explore the connection between geography and language models by highlighting their tendency to misrepresent spatial information, thus leading to distortions in the representation of geographical distances. This study introduces four indicators to assess these distortions, by comparing geographical and semantic distances. Experiments are conducted from these four indicators with ten widely used language models. Results underscore the critical necessity of inspecting and rectifying spatial biases in language models to ensure accurate and equitable representations.

Related papers

• Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
  This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases. The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z)
• Understanding Cross-Lingual Alignment -- A Survey [52.572071017877704]
  Cross-lingual alignment is the meaningful similarity of representations across languages in multilingual language models. We survey the literature of techniques to improve cross-lingual alignment, providing a taxonomy of methods and summarising insights from throughout the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T11:39:53Z)
• Geographically-Informed Language Identification [0.6445605125467574]
  This paper develops an approach to language identification in which the set of languages considered by the model depends on the geographic origin of the text in question. It formulates 16 region-specific models, each of which contains the languages expected to appear in countries within that region. These regional models also each include 31 widely-spoken international languages in order to ensure coverage of these linguae francae regardless of location.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T21:55:17Z)
• On the Scaling Laws of Geographical Representation in Language Models [0.11510009152620666]
  We show that geographical knowledge is observable even for tiny models, and that it scales consistently as we increase the model size. Notably, we observe that larger language models cannot mitigate the geographical bias that is inherent to the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T18:04:11Z)
• Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
  This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z)
• GeoGLUE: A GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark [56.08664336835741]
  We propose a GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, named GeoGLUE. We collect data from open-released geographic resources and introduce six natural language understanding tasks. We pro vide evaluation experiments and analysis of general baselines, indicating the effectiveness and significance of the GeoGLUE benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T03:21:56Z)
• Logographic Information Aids Learning Better Representations for Natural Language Inference [3.677231059555795]
  We present a novel study which explores the benefits of providing language models with logographic information in learning better semantic representations. Our evaluation results in six languages suggest significant benefits of using multi-modal embeddings in languages with logograhic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T20:40:14Z)
• Measuring Geographic Performance Disparities of Offensive Language Classifiers [12.545108947857802]
  We ask two questions: Does language, dialect, and topical content vary across geographical regions?'' and If there are differences across the regions, do they impact model performance?'' We find that current models do not generalize across locations. Likewise, we show that while offensive language models produce false positives on African American English, model performance is not correlated with each city's minority population proportions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T15:08:18Z)
• Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome? [4.344337854565144]
  We exploit the fact that in geography, ground truths are available beyond local relations. We find that language models generally encode limited geographic information, but with larger models performing the best.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T13:28:16Z)
• A Massively Multilingual Analysis of Cross-linguality in Shared Embedding Space [61.18554842370824]
  In cross-lingual language models, representations for many different languages live in the same space. We compute a task-based measure of cross-lingual alignment in the form of bitext retrieval performance. We examine a range of linguistic, quasi-linguistic, and training-related features as potential predictors of these alignment metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T21:05:37Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.