Testing and Understanding Erroneous Planning in LLM Agents through Synthesized User Inputs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17833v1
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:56:45 GMT
- Title: Testing and Understanding Erroneous Planning in LLM Agents through Synthesized User Inputs
- Authors: Zhenlan Ji, Daoyuan Wu, Pingchuan Ma, Zongjie Li, Shuai Wang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated effectiveness in solving a wide range of tasks.
LLMs are prone to making erroneous plans, especially when the tasks are complex and require long-term planning.
We propose PDoctor, a novel approach to testing LLM agents and understanding their erroneous planning.
- Score: 12.412286518773028
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Agents based on large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated effectiveness in solving a wide range of tasks by integrating LLMs with key modules such as planning, memory, and tool usage. Increasingly, customers are adopting LLM agents across a variety of commercial applications critical to reliability, including support for mental well-being, chemical synthesis, and software development. Nevertheless, our observations and daily use of LLM agents indicate that they are prone to making erroneous plans, especially when the tasks are complex and require long-term planning. In this paper, we propose PDoctor, a novel and automated approach to testing LLM agents and understanding their erroneous planning. As the first work in this direction, we formulate the detection of erroneous planning as a constraint satisfiability problem: an LLM agent's plan is considered erroneous if its execution violates the constraints derived from the user inputs. To this end, PDoctor first defines a domain-specific language (DSL) for user queries and synthesizes varying inputs with the assistance of the Z3 constraint solver. These synthesized inputs are natural language paragraphs that specify the requirements for completing a series of tasks. Then, PDoctor derives constraints from these requirements to form a testing oracle. We evaluate PDoctor with three mainstream agent frameworks and two powerful LLMs (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4). The results show that PDoctor can effectively detect diverse errors in agent planning and provide insights and error characteristics that are valuable to both agent developers and users. We conclude by discussing potential alternative designs and directions to extend PDoctor.
Related papers
- A Systematic Study of Large Language Models for Task and Motion Planning With PDDLStream [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) to solve complex robotics problems requires understanding their planning capabilities.<n>One promising direction is to integrate the semantic knowledge of LLMs with the formal reasoning of task and motion planning.<n>We develop 16 algorithms that use Gemini 2.5 Flash to substitute key TAMP components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T19:03:14Z) - AGENTIF: Benchmarking Instruction Following of Large Language Models in Agentic Scenarios [51.46347732659174]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated advanced capabilities in real-world agentic applications.<n>AgentIF is the first benchmark for systematically evaluating LLM instruction following ability in agentic scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T17:31:10Z) - Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making.
Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance.
We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z) - Scaling Up Natural Language Understanding for Multi-Robots Through the Lens of Hierarchy [8.180994118420053]
Long-horizon planning is hindered by challenges such as uncertainty accumulation, computational complexity, delayed rewards and incomplete information.
This work proposes an approach to exploit the task hierarchy from human instructions to facilitate multi-robot planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T14:46:13Z) - Prompt Recursive Search: A Living Framework with Adaptive Growth in LLM Auto-Prompting [22.025533583703126]
We propose a novel Prompt Recursive Search (PRS) framework for large language models (LLMs)
PRS framework incorporates an assessment of problem complexity and an adjustable structure, ensuring a reduction in the likelihood of errors.
Compared to the Chain of Thought (CoT) method, the PRS method has increased the accuracy on the BBH dataset by 8% using Llama3-7B model, achieving a 22% improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T17:59:42Z) - Ask-before-Plan: Proactive Language Agents for Real-World Planning [68.08024918064503]
Proactive Agent Planning requires language agents to predict clarification needs based on user-agent conversation and agent-environment interaction.
We propose a novel multi-agent framework, Clarification-Execution-Planning (textttCEP), which consists of three agents specialized in clarification, execution, and planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T14:07:28Z) - Enhancing the General Agent Capabilities of Low-Parameter LLMs through Tuning and Multi-Branch Reasoning [56.82041895921434]
Open-source pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong language understanding and generation capabilities.
When used as agents for dealing with complex problems in the real world, their performance is far inferior to large commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T03:48:12Z) - KnowAgent: Knowledge-Augmented Planning for LLM-Based Agents [54.09074527006576]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in complex reasoning tasks, yet they fall short when tackling more sophisticated challenges.
This inadequacy primarily stems from the lack of built-in action knowledge in language agents.
We introduce KnowAgent, a novel approach designed to enhance the planning capabilities of LLMs by incorporating explicit action knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T16:39:12Z) - AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Models [56.367020818139665]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the potential in acting as autonomous agents for sequential decision-making tasks.
We propose a closed-loop approach, AdaPlanner, which allows the LLM agent to refine its self-generated plan adaptively in response to environmental feedback.
To mitigate hallucination, we develop a code-style LLM prompt structure that facilitates plan generation across a variety of tasks, environments, and agent capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T05:52:27Z) - Understanding the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Automated
Planning [24.37599752610625]
The study seeks to shed light on the capabilities of LLMs in solving complex planning problems.
It provides insights into the most effective approaches for using LLMs in this context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T15:21:09Z) - Plan, Eliminate, and Track -- Language Models are Good Teachers for
Embodied Agents [99.17668730578586]
Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) capture procedural knowledge about the world.
Plan, Eliminate, and Track (PET) framework translates a task description into a list of high-level sub-tasks.
PET framework leads to a significant 15% improvement over SOTA for generalization to human goal specifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-03T20:11:22Z) - Plansformer: Generating Symbolic Plans using Transformers [24.375997526106246]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been the subject of active research, significantly advancing the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
We introduce Plansformer; an LLM fine-tuned on planning problems and capable of generating plans with favorable behavior in terms of correctness and length with reduced knowledge-engineering efforts.
For one configuration of Plansformer, we achieve 97% valid plans, out of which 95% are optimal for Towers of Hanoi - a puzzle-solving domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T19:06:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.