TextGram: Towards a better domain-adaptive pretraining

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18228v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:44:57 GMT
• Title: TextGram: Towards a better domain-adaptive pretraining
• Authors: Sharayu Hiwarkhedkar, Saloni Mittal, Vidula Magdum, Omkar Dhekane, Raviraj Joshi, Geetanjali Kale, Arnav Ladkat,
• Abstract summary: In NLP, pre-training involves using a large amount of text data to gain prior knowledge for performing downstream tasks. We propose our own domain-adaptive data selection method - TextGram. We show that the proposed strategy works better compared to other selection methods.
• Score: 0.3769303106863454
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: For green AI, it is crucial to measure and reduce the carbon footprint emitted during the training of large language models. In NLP, performing pre-training on Transformer models requires significant computational resources. This pre-training involves using a large amount of text data to gain prior knowledge for performing downstream tasks. Thus, it is important that we select the correct data in the form of domain-specific data from this vast corpus to achieve optimum results aligned with our domain-specific tasks. While training on large unsupervised data is expensive, it can be optimized by performing a data selection step before pretraining. Selecting important data reduces the space overhead and the substantial amount of time required to pre-train the model while maintaining constant accuracy. We investigate the existing selection strategies and propose our own domain-adaptive data selection method - TextGram - that effectively selects essential data from large corpora. We compare and evaluate the results of finetuned models for text classification task with and without data selection. We show that the proposed strategy works better compared to other selection methods.

Related papers

• Get more for less: Principled Data Selection for Warming Up Fine-Tuning in LLMs [18.242110417706]
  This work focuses on leveraging and selecting from vast, unlabeled, open data to pre-fine-tune a pre-trained language model. We show the optimality of this approach for fine-tuning tasks under certain conditions. Our proposed method is significantly faster than existing techniques, scaling to millions of samples within a single GPU hour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T00:08:00Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodels [81.01744199870043]
  Standard practice is to filter for examples that match human notions of data quality. We find that selecting according to similarity with "high quality" data sources may not increase (and can even hurt) performance compared to randomly selecting data. Our framework avoids handpicked notions of data quality, and instead models explicitly how the learning process uses train datapoints to predict on the target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T17:22:00Z)
• Efficient Grammatical Error Correction Via Multi-Task Training and Optimized Training Schedule [55.08778142798106]
  We propose auxiliary tasks that exploit the alignment between the original and corrected sentences. We formulate each task as a sequence-to-sequence problem and perform multi-task training. We find that the order of datasets used for training and even individual instances within a dataset may have important effects on the final performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:50:12Z)
• Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resampling [90.9263039747723]
  We formalize the problem of selecting a subset of a large raw unlabeled dataset to match a desired target distribution. We extend the classic importance resampling approach used in low-dimensions for LM data selection. We instantiate the DSIR framework with hashed n-gram features for efficiency, enabling the selection of 100M documents in 4.5 hours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T23:57:56Z)
• Automatic Document Selection for Efficient Encoder Pretraining [31.941315346316465]
  We propose an alternative to larger training sets by automatically identifying smaller yet domain-representative subsets. We treat the OntoNotes corpus as a target domain and pretrain a RoBERTa-like encoder from a cynically selected subset of the Pile. On both perplexity and across several downstream tasks in the target domain, it consistently outperforms random selection with 20x less data, 3x fewer training iterations, and 2x less estimated cloud compute cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T01:45:02Z)
• On the Complementarity of Data Selection and Fine Tuning for Domain Adaptation [22.178874891042994]
  Domain adaptation of neural networks commonly relies on three training phases: pretraining, selected data training and then fine tuning. Data selection improves target domain generalization by training further on pretraining data identified by relying on a small sample of target domain data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T21:49:06Z)
• Efficient Conditional Pre-training for Transfer Learning [71.01129334495553]
  We propose efficient filtering methods to select relevant subsets from the pre-training dataset. We validate our techniques by pre-training on ImageNet in both the unsupervised and supervised settings. We improve standard ImageNet pre-training by 1-3% by tuning available models on our subsets and pre-training on a dataset filtered from a larger scale dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-20T06:16:15Z)
• Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks [81.99843216550306]
  We present a study across four domains (biomedical and computer science publications, news, and reviews) and eight classification tasks. A second phase of pretraining in-domain (domain-adaptive pretraining) leads to performance gains. Adapting to the task's unlabeled data (task-adaptive pretraining) improves performance even after domain-adaptive pretraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-23T04:21:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.