Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18736v4
• Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:43:10 GMT
• Title: Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle
• Authors: Luca Deck, Astrid Schomäcker, Timo Speith, Jakob Schöffer, Lena Kästner, Niklas Kühl,
• Abstract summary: We see explainable AI (XAI) as a promising way to increase fairness in AI systems. We distill eight fairness desiderata, map them along the AI lifecycle, and discuss how XAI could help address each of them.
• Score: 1.4183971140167246
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across various domains is increasingly surfacing issues related to algorithmic fairness, especially in high-stakes scenarios. Thus, critical considerations of how fairness in AI systems might be improved -- and what measures are available to aid this process -- are overdue. Many researchers and policymakers see explainable AI (XAI) as a promising way to increase fairness in AI systems. However, there is a wide variety of XAI methods and fairness conceptions expressing different desiderata, and the precise connections between XAI and fairness remain largely nebulous. Besides, different measures to increase algorithmic fairness might be applicable at different points throughout an AI system's lifecycle. Yet, there currently is no coherent mapping of fairness desiderata along the AI lifecycle. In this paper, we we distill eight fairness desiderata, map them along the AI lifecycle, and discuss how XAI could help address each of them. We hope to provide orientation for practical applications and to inspire XAI research specifically focused on these fairness desiderata.

Related papers

• Trustworthy XAI and Application [0.0]
  The article explores XAI, reliable XAI, and several practical uses for reliable XAI. We go over the three main components-transparency, explainability, and trustworthiness-that we determined are pertinent in this situation. In the end, trustworthiness is crucial for establishing and maintaining trust between humans and AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T16:10:10Z)
• Applications of Explainable artificial intelligence in Earth system science [12.454478986296152]
  This review aims to provide a foundational understanding of explainable AI (XAI) XAI offers a set of powerful tools that make the models more transparent. We identify four significant challenges that XAI faces within the Earth system science (ESS) A visionary outlook for ESS envisions a harmonious blend where process-based models govern the known, AI models explore the unknown, and XAI bridges the gap by providing explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T15:05:29Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness [16.588468396705366]
  The study of AI fairness has rapidly developed into a rich field of research with links to computer science, social science, law, and philosophy. Many technical solutions for measuring and achieving AI fairness have been proposed, yet their approach has been criticized in recent years for being misleading, unrealistic and harmful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T11:23:24Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering [20.644494592443245]
  We present a Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T00:09:08Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approaches: A Survey [0.22940141855172028]
  Lack of explainability of a decision from an Artificial Intelligence based "black box" system/model is a key stumbling block for adopting AI in high stakes applications. We demonstrate popular Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods with a mutual case study/task. We analyze for competitive advantages from multiple perspectives. We recommend paths towards responsible or human-centered AI using XAI as a medium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-23T06:15:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.