Modeling Caption Diversity in Contrastive Vision-Language Pretraining

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00740v3
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 12:48:45 GMT
• Title: Modeling Caption Diversity in Contrastive Vision-Language Pretraining
• Authors: Samuel Lavoie, Polina Kirichenko, Mark Ibrahim, Mahmoud Assran, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Aaron Courville, Nicolas Ballas,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Llip, Latent Language Image Pretraining, which models the diversity of captions that could match an image. Llip's vision encoder outputs a set of visual features that are mixed into a final representation by conditioning on information derived from the text. We show that Llip outperforms non-contextualized baselines like CLIP and SigLIP on a variety of tasks even with large-scale encoders.
• Score: 48.7603274197994
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There are a thousand ways to caption an image. Contrastive Language Pretraining (CLIP) on the other hand, works by mapping an image and its caption to a single vector -- limiting how well CLIP-like models can represent the diverse ways to describe an image. In this work, we introduce Llip, Latent Language Image Pretraining, which models the diversity of captions that could match an image. Llip's vision encoder outputs a set of visual features that are mixed into a final representation by conditioning on information derived from the text. We show that Llip outperforms non-contextualized baselines like CLIP and SigLIP on a variety of tasks even with large-scale encoders. Llip improves zero-shot classification by an average of 2.9% zero-shot classification benchmarks with a ViT-G/14 encoder. Specifically, Llip attains a zero-shot top-1 accuracy of 83.5% on ImageNet outperforming a similarly sized CLIP by 1.4%. We also demonstrate improvement on zero-shot retrieval on MS-COCO by 6.0%. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the components introduced by the method and demonstrate that Llip leads to richer visual representations.

Related papers

• TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives [65.82577305915643]
  Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) models maximize the mutual information between text and visual modalities to learn representations. We show that generating hard'' negative captions via in-context learning and corresponding negative images with text-to-image generators offers a solution. We demonstrate that our method, named TripletCLIP, enhances the compositional capabilities of CLIP, resulting in an absolute improvement of over 9% on the SugarCrepe benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T19:24:59Z)
• Semantic Compositions Enhance Vision-Language Contrastive Learning [46.985865191341944]
  We show that the zero-shot classification and retrieval capabilities of CLIP-like models can be improved significantly through the introduction of semantically composite examples during pretraining. Our method fuses the captions and blends 50% of each image to form a new composite sample. The benefits of CLIP-C are particularly pronounced in settings with relatively limited pretraining data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T15:58:20Z)
• Mining Fine-Grained Image-Text Alignment for Zero-Shot Captioning via Text-Only Training [14.340740609933437]
  We propose a novel zero-shot image captioning framework with text-only training to reduce the modality gap. In particular, we introduce a subregion feature aggregation to leverage local region information. We extend our framework to build a zero-shot VQA pipeline, demonstrating its generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T16:43:46Z)
• CLIP meets Model Zoo Experts: Pseudo-Supervision for Visual Enhancement [65.47237619200442]
  Contrastive language image pretraining (CLIP) is a standard method for training vision-language models. We augment CLIP training with task-specific vision models from model zoos to improve its visual representations. This simple setup shows substantial improvements of up to 16.3% across different vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-21T20:20:13Z)
• SILC: Improving Vision Language Pretraining with Self-Distillation [113.50400246862056]
  We introduce SILC, a novel framework for vision language pretraining. SILC improves image-text contrastive learning with the simple addition of local-to-global correspondence learning by self-distillation. We show that distilling local image features from an exponential moving average (EMA) teacher model significantly improves model performance on dense predictions tasks like detection and segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T08:44:47Z)
• VeCLIP: Improving CLIP Training via Visual-enriched Captions [63.547204530720705]
  This study introduces a scalable pipeline for noisy caption rewriting. We emphasize the incorporation of visual concepts into captions, termed as Visual-enriched Captions (VeCap) We showcase the adaptation of this method for training CLIP on large-scale web-crawled datasets, termed VeCLIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T17:49:13Z)
• Linear Alignment of Vision-language Models for Image Captioning [9.746397419479447]
  We propose a more efficient training protocol that fits a linear mapping between image and text embeddings of CLIP. This bypasses the need for gradient computation and results in a lightweight captioning method called ReCap. We evaluate ReCap on MS-COCO, Flickr30k, VizWiz, and MSRVTT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T17:59:21Z)
• Learning to Decompose Visual Features with Latent Textual Prompts [140.2117637223449]
  We propose Decomposed Feature Prompting (DeFo) to improve vision-language models. Our empirical study shows DeFo's significance in improving the vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-09T15:40:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.