How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00970v1
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 03:18:03 GMT
• Title: How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responses
• Authors: Jionghao Lin, Zifei Han, Danielle R. Thomas, Ashish Gurung, Shivang Gupta, Vincent Aleven, Kenneth R. Koedinger,
• Abstract summary: One-on-one tutoring is widely acknowledged as an effective instructional method, conditioned on qualified tutors. The GPT-4 model was employed to build an explanatory feedback system. This system identifies trainees' responses in binary form (i.e., correct/incorrect) and automatically provides template-based feedback with responses appropriately rephrased by the GPT-4 model.
• Score: 2.2077346768771653
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: One-on-one tutoring is widely acknowledged as an effective instructional method, conditioned on qualified tutors. However, the high demand for qualified tutors remains a challenge, often necessitating the training of novice tutors (i.e., trainees) to ensure effective tutoring. Research suggests that providing timely explanatory feedback can facilitate the training process for trainees. However, it presents challenges due to the time-consuming nature of assessing trainee performance by human experts. Inspired by the recent advancements of large language models (LLMs), our study employed the GPT-4 model to build an explanatory feedback system. This system identifies trainees' responses in binary form (i.e., correct/incorrect) and automatically provides template-based feedback with responses appropriately rephrased by the GPT-4 model. We conducted our study on 410 responses from trainees across three training lessons: Giving Effective Praise, Reacting to Errors, and Determining What Students Know. Our findings indicate that: 1) using a few-shot approach, the GPT-4 model effectively identifies correct/incorrect trainees' responses from three training lessons with an average F1 score of 0.84 and an AUC score of 0.85; and 2) using the few-shot approach, the GPT-4 model adeptly rephrases incorrect trainees' responses into desired responses, achieving performance comparable to that of human experts.

Related papers

• Self-Judge: Selective Instruction Following with Alignment Self-Evaluation [27.69410513313001]
  We study the study of selective instruction following, whereby the system declines to execute instructions if the anticipated response quality is low. We introduce Self-J, a novel self-training framework for developing judge models without needing human-annotated quality scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T04:14:13Z)
• Self-Taught Evaluators [77.92610887220594]
  We present an approach that aims to im-proves without human annotations, using synthetic training data only. Our Self-Taught Evaluator can improve a strong LLM from 75.4 to 88.3 on RewardBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T17:57:02Z)
• How Can I Improve? Using GPT to Highlight the Desired and Undesired Parts of Open-ended Responses [11.809647985607935]
  We explore a sequence labeling approach focused on identifying components of desired and less desired praise for providing explanatory feedback. To quantify the quality of highlighted praise components identified by GPT models, we introduced a Modified Intersection over Union (M-IoU) score. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) the M-IoU score effectively correlates with human judgment in evaluating sequence quality; (2) using two-shot prompting on GPT-3.5 resulted in decent performance in recognizing effort-based and outcome-based praise; and (3) our optimally fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model achieved M-IoU scores of 0.6
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T02:59:10Z)
• Improving the Validity of Automatically Generated Feedback via Reinforcement Learning [50.067342343957876]
  We propose a framework for feedback generation that optimize both correctness and alignment using reinforcement learning (RL) Specifically, we use GPT-4's annotations to create preferences over feedback pairs in an augmented dataset for training via direct preference optimization (DPO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T20:25:50Z)
• A Critical Evaluation of AI Feedback for Aligning Large Language Models [60.42291111149438]
  We show that simple supervised fine-tuning with GPT-4 as the teacher outperforms existing RLAIF pipelines. More generally, we find that the gains from RLAIF vary substantially across base model families, test-time evaluation protocols, and critic models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:53:54Z)
• Comparative Analysis of GPT-4 and Human Graders in Evaluating Praise Given to Students in Synthetic Dialogues [2.3361634876233817]
  Large language models, such as the AI-chatbot ChatGPT, hold potential for offering constructive feedback to tutors in practical settings. The accuracy of AI-generated feedback remains uncertain, with scant research investigating the ability of models like ChatGPT to deliver effective feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T04:14:01Z)
• Using Large Language Models to Provide Explanatory Feedback to Human Tutors [3.2507682694499582]
  We present two approaches for supplying tutors real-time feedback within an online lesson on how to give students effective praise. This work-in-progress demonstrates considerable accuracy in binary classification for corrective feedback of effective, or effort-based. More notably, we introduce progress towards an enhanced approach of providing explanatory feedback using large language model-facilitated named entity recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T14:19:12Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Adversarial Training is Not Ready for Robot Learning [55.493354071227174]
  Adversarial training is an effective method to train deep learning models that are resilient to norm-bounded perturbations. We show theoretically and experimentally that neural controllers obtained via adversarial training are subjected to three types of defects. Our results suggest that adversarial training is not yet ready for robot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T07:51:31Z)
• Facial Feedback for Reinforcement Learning: A Case Study and Offline Analysis Using the TAMER Framework [51.237191651923666]
  We investigate the potential of agent learning from trainers' facial expressions via interpreting them as evaluative feedback. With designed CNN-RNN model, our analysis shows that telling trainers to use facial expressions and competition can improve the accuracies for estimating positive and negative feedback. Our results with a simulation experiment show that learning solely from predicted feedback based on facial expressions is possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-23T17:50:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.