Balance Reward and Safety Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Perspective of Gradient Manipulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01677v2
• Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 05:18:04 GMT
• Title: Balance Reward and Safety Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Perspective of Gradient Manipulation
• Authors: Shangding Gu, Bilgehan Sel, Yuhao Ding, Lu Wang, Qingwei Lin, Ming Jin, Alois Knoll,
• Abstract summary: Managing the trade-off between reward and safety during exploration presents a significant challenge. In this study, we aim to address this conflicting relation by leveraging the theory of gradient manipulation. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithms outperform several state-of-the-art baselines in terms of balancing reward and safety optimization.
• Score: 26.244121960815907
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring the safety of Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for its deployment in real-world applications. Nevertheless, managing the trade-off between reward and safety during exploration presents a significant challenge. Improving reward performance through policy adjustments may adversely affect safety performance. In this study, we aim to address this conflicting relation by leveraging the theory of gradient manipulation. Initially, we analyze the conflict between reward and safety gradients. Subsequently, we tackle the balance between reward and safety optimization by proposing a soft switching policy optimization method, for which we provide convergence analysis. Based on our theoretical examination, we provide a safe RL framework to overcome the aforementioned challenge, and we develop a Safety-MuJoCo Benchmark to assess the performance of safe RL algorithms. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of our method on the Safety-MuJoCo Benchmark and a popular safe RL benchmark, Omnisafe. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithms outperform several state-of-the-art baselines in terms of balancing reward and safety optimization.

Related papers

• Safety Optimized Reinforcement Learning via Multi-Objective Policy Optimization [3.425378723819911]
  Safe reinforcement learning (Safe RL) refers to a class of techniques that aim to prevent RL algorithms from violating constraints. In this paper, a novel model-free Safe RL algorithm, formulated based on the multi-objective policy optimization framework is introduced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T08:58:38Z)
• Iterative Reachability Estimation for Safe Reinforcement Learning [23.942701020636882]
  We propose a new framework, Reachability Estimation for Safe Policy Optimization (RESPO), for safety-constrained reinforcement learning (RL) environments. In the feasible set where there exist violation-free policies, we optimize for rewards while maintaining persistent safety. We evaluate the proposed methods on a diverse suite of safe RL environments from Safety Gym, PyBullet, and MuJoCo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T02:36:42Z)
• Approximate Model-Based Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled look-ahead shielding algorithm for verifying the performance of learned RL policies. Our algorithm differs from other shielding approaches in that it does not require prior knowledge of the safety-relevant dynamics of the system. We demonstrate superior performance to other safety-aware approaches on a set of Atari games with state-dependent safety-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T15:19:45Z)
• A Multiplicative Value Function for Safe and Efficient Reinforcement Learning [131.96501469927733]
  We propose a safe model-free RL algorithm with a novel multiplicative value function consisting of a safety critic and a reward critic. The safety critic predicts the probability of constraint violation and discounts the reward critic that only estimates constraint-free returns. We evaluate our method in four safety-focused environments, including classical RL benchmarks augmented with safety constraints and robot navigation tasks with images and raw Lidar scans as observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:29:15Z)
• Efficient Exploration Using Extra Safety Budget in Constrained Policy Optimization [15.483557012655927]
  We propose an algorithm named Constrained Policy Optimization with Extra Safety Budget (ESB-CPO) to strike a balance between the exploration efficiency and the constraints satisfaction. Our method gains remarkable performance improvement under the same cost limit compared with baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T06:16:34Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarking [12.719948223824483]
  reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. We introduce a categorization of existing provably safe RL methods, present the conceptual foundations for both continuous and discrete action spaces, and empirically benchmark existing methods. We provide practical guidance on selecting provably safe RL approaches depending on the safety specification, RL algorithm, and type of action space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T16:34:36Z)
• Constrained Policy Optimization via Bayesian World Models [79.0077602277004]
  LAMBDA is a model-based approach for policy optimization in safety critical tasks modeled via constrained Markov decision processes. We demonstrate LAMBDA's state of the art performance on the Safety-Gym benchmark suite in terms of sample efficiency and constraint violation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T17:02:22Z)
• Conservative Safety Critics for Exploration [120.73241848565449]
  We study the problem of safe exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) We learn a conservative safety estimate of environment states through a critic. We show that the proposed approach can achieve competitive task performance while incurring significantly lower catastrophic failure rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T17:54:25Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processes [20.175139766171277]
  We propose an algorithm, SNO-MDP, that explores and optimize Markov decision processes under unknown safety constraints. We provide theoretical guarantees on both the satisfaction of the safety constraint and the near-optimality of the cumulative reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T02:20:23Z)
• Cautious Reinforcement Learning with Logical Constraints [78.96597639789279]
  An adaptive safe padding forces Reinforcement Learning (RL) to synthesise optimal control policies while ensuring safety during the learning process. Theoretical guarantees are available on the optimality of the synthesised policies and on the convergence of the learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T00:01:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.