Automatically Extracting Numerical Results from Randomized Controlled Trials with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01686v2
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 03:29:09 GMT
• Title: Automatically Extracting Numerical Results from Randomized Controlled Trials with Large Language Models
• Authors: Hye Sun Yun, David Pogrebitskiy, Iain J. Marshall, Byron C. Wallace,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate whether modern large language models (LLMs) can reliably perform this task. Massive LLMs that can accommodate lengthy inputs are tantalizingly close to realizing fully automatic meta-analysis.
• Score: 19.72316842477808
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Meta-analyses statistically aggregate the findings of different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess treatment effectiveness. Because this yields robust estimates of treatment effectiveness, results from meta-analyses are considered the strongest form of evidence. However, rigorous evidence syntheses are time-consuming and labor-intensive, requiring manual extraction of data from individual trials to be synthesized. Ideally, language technologies would permit fully automatic meta-analysis, on demand. This requires accurately extracting numerical results from individual trials, which has been beyond the capabilities of natural language processing (NLP) models to date. In this work, we evaluate whether modern large language models (LLMs) can reliably perform this task. We annotate (and release) a modest but granular evaluation dataset of clinical trial reports with numerical findings attached to interventions, comparators, and outcomes. Using this dataset, we evaluate the performance of seven LLMs applied zero-shot for the task of conditionally extracting numerical findings from trial reports. We find that massive LLMs that can accommodate lengthy inputs are tantalizingly close to realizing fully automatic meta-analysis, especially for dichotomous (binary) outcomes (e.g., mortality). However, LLMs -- including ones trained on biomedical texts -- perform poorly when the outcome measures are complex and tallying the results requires inference. This work charts a path toward fully automatic meta-analysis of RCTs via LLMs, while also highlighting the limitations of existing models for this aim.

Related papers

• Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Structured Data Extraction from Diagnostic Reports [2.932283627137903]
  The study utilized two datasets: 7,294 radiology reports annotated for Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) scores and 2,154 pathology reports for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T15:21:45Z)
• A Gradient Analysis Framework for Rewarding Good and Penalizing Bad Examples in Language Models [63.949883238901414]
  We present a unique angle of gradient analysis of loss functions that simultaneously reward good examples and penalize bad ones in LMs. We find that ExMATE serves as a superior surrogate for MLE, and that combining DPO with ExMATE instead of MLE further enhances both the statistical (5-7%) and generative (+18% win rate) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:46:18Z)
• When Raw Data Prevails: Are Large Language Model Embeddings Effective in Numerical Data Representation for Medical Machine Learning Applications? [8.89829757177796]
  We examine the effectiveness of vector representations from last hidden states of Large Language Models for medical diagnostics and prognostics. We focus on instruction-tuned LLMs in a zero-shot setting to represent abnormal physiological data and evaluate their utilities as feature extractors. Although findings suggest the raw data features still prevails in medical ML tasks, zero-shot LLM embeddings demonstrate competitive results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T03:56:40Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science. Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z)
• Exploring the use of a Large Language Model for data extraction in systematic reviews: a rapid feasibility study [0.28318468414401093]
  This paper describes a rapid feasibility study of using GPT-4, a large language model (LLM), to (semi)automate data extraction in systematic reviews. Overall, results indicated an accuracy of around 80%, with some variability between domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T11:24:23Z)
• Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models [59.89454513692417]
  Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:12:28Z)
• Jointly Extracting Interventions, Outcomes, and Findings from RCT Reports with LLMs [21.868871974136884]
  We propose and evaluate a text-to-text model built on instruction-tuned Large Language Models. We apply our model to a collection of published RCTs through mid-2022, and release a searchable database of structured findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T16:02:06Z)
• An Iterative Optimizing Framework for Radiology Report Summarization with ChatGPT [80.33783969507458]
  The 'Impression' section of a radiology report is a critical basis for communication between radiologists and other physicians. Recent studies have achieved promising results in automatic impression generation using large-scale medical text data. These models often require substantial amounts of medical text data and have poor generalization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T17:13:42Z)
• mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation [79.60172087719356]
  Abstractive summarization has enjoyed renewed interest in recent years, thanks to pre-trained language models and the availability of large-scale datasets. Despite promising results, current models still suffer from generating factually inconsistent summaries. We leverage factual consistency evaluation models to improve multilingual summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T19:52:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.