Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05052v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:12:28 GMT
• Title: Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models
• Authors: Aleksa Bisercic, Mladen Nikolic, Mihaela van der Schaar, Boris Delibasic, Pietro Lio, Andrija Petrovic
• Abstract summary: Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
• Score: 59.89454513692417
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. Traditional machine learning (ML) models designed to work with tabular data, cannot effectively process information in such form. On the other hand, large language models (LLMs) which excel at textual tasks, are probably not the best tool for modeling tabular data. Therefore, we propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. Drawing upon the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, TEMED-LLM goes beyond traditional extraction techniques, accurately inferring tabular features, even when their names are not explicitly mentioned in the text. This is achieved by combining domain-specific reasoning guidelines with a proposed data validation and reasoning correction feedback loop. By applying interpretable ML models such as decision trees and logistic regression over the extracted and validated data, we obtain end-to-end interpretable predictions. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics. Given its predictive performance, simplicity, and interpretability, TEMED-LLM underscores the potential of leveraging LLMs to improve the performance and trustworthiness of ML models in medical applications.

Related papers

• Using Large Language Models for Expert Prior Elicitation in Predictive Modelling [53.54623137152208]
  This study proposes using large language models (LLMs) to elicit expert prior distributions for predictive models. We compare LLM-elicited and uninformative priors, evaluate whether LLMs truthfully generate parameter distributions, and propose a model selection strategy for in-context learning and prior elicitation. Our findings show that LLM-elicited prior parameter distributions significantly reduce predictive error compared to uninformative priors in low-data settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T10:13:39Z)
• When Raw Data Prevails: Are Large Language Model Embeddings Effective in Numerical Data Representation for Medical Machine Learning Applications? [8.89829757177796]
  We examine the effectiveness of vector representations from last hidden states of Large Language Models for medical diagnostics and prognostics. We focus on instruction-tuned LLMs in a zero-shot setting to represent abnormal physiological data and evaluate their utilities as feature extractors. Although findings suggest the raw data features still prevails in medical ML tasks, zero-shot LLM embeddings demonstrate competitive results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T03:56:40Z)
• Is larger always better? Evaluating and prompting large language models for non-generative medical tasks [11.799956298563844]
  This study benchmarks various models, including GPT-based LLMs, BERT-based models, and traditional clinical predictive models. We focused on tasks such as readmission and prediction, disease hierarchy reconstruction, and biomedical sentence matching. Results indicated that LLMs exhibited robust zero-shot predictive capabilities on structured EHR data when using well-designed prompting strategies. For unstructured medical texts, LLMs did not outperform finetuned BERT models, which excelled in both supervised and unsupervised tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T06:09:10Z)
• Enhancing Medication Recommendation with LLM Text Representation [0.0]
  We propose a method of enhancing medication recommendation with Large Language Model (LLM) text representation. LLM harnesses powerful language understanding and generation capabilities, enabling the extraction of information from complex and lengthy unstructured data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T05:51:11Z)
• CLAIM Your Data: Enhancing Imputation Accuracy with Contextual Large Language Models [0.18416014644193068]
  This paper introduces the Contextual Language model for Accurate Imputation Method (CLAIM) Unlike traditional imputation methods, CLAIM utilizes contextually relevant natural language descriptors to fill missing values. Our evaluations across diverse datasets and missingness patterns reveal CLAIM's superior performance over existing imputation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T00:08:29Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
• Local Large Language Models for Complex Structured Medical Tasks [0.0]
  This paper introduces an approach that combines the language reasoning capabilities of large language models with the benefits of local training to tackle complex, domain-specific tasks. Specifically, the authors demonstrate their approach by extracting structured condition codes from pathology reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:36:13Z)
• Language models are weak learners [71.33837923104808]
  We show that prompt-based large language models can operate effectively as weak learners. We incorporate these models into a boosting approach, which can leverage the knowledge within the model to outperform traditional tree-based boosting. Results illustrate the potential for prompt-based LLMs to function not just as few-shot learners themselves, but as components of larger machine learning pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T02:39:19Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• An Iterative Optimizing Framework for Radiology Report Summarization with ChatGPT [80.33783969507458]
  The 'Impression' section of a radiology report is a critical basis for communication between radiologists and other physicians. Recent studies have achieved promising results in automatic impression generation using large-scale medical text data. These models often require substantial amounts of medical text data and have poor generalization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T17:13:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.