Layers of technology in pluriversal design. Decolonising language technology with the LiveLanguage initiative

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01783v1
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 23:52:39 GMT
• Title: Layers of technology in pluriversal design. Decolonising language technology with the LiveLanguage initiative
• Authors: Gertraud Koch, Gábor Bella, Paula Helm, Fausto Giunchiglia,
• Abstract summary: This paper uses LiveLanguage, a lexical database, as an example to discuss and close the gap from pluriversal design theory to practice. The paper presents a model comprising of five layers of technological activity.
• Score: 9.063726739562227
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Language technology has the potential to facilitate intercultural communication through meaningful translations. However, the current state of language technology is deeply entangled with colonial knowledge due to path dependencies and neo-colonial tendencies in the global governance of artificial intelligence (AI). Language technology is a complex and emerging field that presents challenges for co-design interventions due to enfolding in assemblages of global scale and diverse sites and its knowledge intensity. This paper uses LiveLanguage, a lexical database, a set of services with particular emphasis on modelling language diversity and integrating small and minority languages, as an example to discuss and close the gap from pluriversal design theory to practice. By diversifying the concept of emerging technology, we can better approach language technology in global contexts. The paper presents a model comprising of five layers of technological activity. Each layer consists of specific practices and stakeholders, thus provides distinctive spaces for co-design interventions as mode of inquiry for de-linking, re-thinking and re-building language technology towards pluriversality. In that way, the paper contributes to reflecting the position of co-design in decolonising emergent technologies, and to integrating complex theoretical knowledge towards decoloniality into language technology design.

Related papers

• A Capabilities Approach to Studying Bias and Harm in Language Technologies [4.135516576952934]
  We consider fairness, bias, and inclusion in Language Technologies through the lens of the Capabilities Approach. The Capabilities Approach centers on what people are capable of achieving, given their intersectional social, political, and economic contexts. We detail the Capabilities Approach, its relationship to multilingual and multicultural evaluation, and how the framework affords meaningful collaboration with community members in defining and measuring the harms of Language Technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T22:46:13Z)
• Responsible Multilingual Large Language Models: A Survey of Development, Applications, and Societal Impact [5.803667039914564]
  This work bridges the gap by providing an end-to-end framework for developing and deploying MLLMs in production environments. Our findings reveal critical challenges in supporting linguistic diversity, with 88.38% of world languages categorized as low-resource. This survey provides essential guidance for practitioners and researchers working to develop more inclusive and effective multilingual AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T03:19:15Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
• Towards Bridging the Digital Language Divide [4.234367850767171]
  multilingual language processing systems often exhibit a hardwired, yet usually involuntary and hidden representational preference towards certain languages. We show that biased technology is often the result of research and development methodologies that do not do justice to the complexity of the languages being represented. We present a new initiative that aims at reducing linguistic bias through both technological design and methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T10:53:20Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• An Inclusive Notion of Text [69.36678873492373]
  We argue that clarity on the notion of text is crucial for reproducible and generalizable NLP. We introduce a two-tier taxonomy of linguistic and non-linguistic elements that are available in textual sources and can be used in NLP modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T14:26:43Z)
• On the cross-lingual transferability of multilingual prototypical models across NLU tasks [2.44288434255221]
  Supervised deep learning-based approaches have been applied to task-oriented dialog and have proven to be effective for limited domain and language applications. In practice, these approaches suffer from the drawbacks of domain-driven design and under-resourced languages. This article proposes to investigate the cross-lingual transferability of using synergistically few-shot learning with prototypical neural networks and multilingual Transformers-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T09:55:04Z)
• Systematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the World's Languages [94.65681336393425]
  We introduce a framework for estimating the global utility of language technologies. Our analyses involve the field at large, but also more in-depth studies on both user-facing technologies and more linguistic NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T14:03:07Z)
• Experience Grounds Language [185.73483760454454]
  Language understanding research is held back by a failure to relate language to the physical world it describes and to the social interactions it facilitates. Despite the incredible effectiveness of language processing models to tackle tasks after being trained on text alone, successful linguistic communication relies on a shared experience of the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T16:56:27Z)
• Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer [64.22926988297685]
  Transfer learning, where a model is first pre-trained on a data-rich task before being fine-tuned on a downstream task, has emerged as a powerful technique in natural language processing (NLP) In this paper, we explore the landscape of introducing transfer learning techniques for NLP by a unified framework that converts all text-based language problems into a text-to-text format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-23T17:37:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.