A comparison of online search engine autocompletion in Google and Baidu

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01917v1
• Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 08:17:04 GMT
• Title: A comparison of online search engine autocompletion in Google and Baidu
• Authors: Geng Liu, Pietro Pinoli, Stefano Ceri, Francesco Pierri,
• Abstract summary: We study the characteristics of search auto-completions in two different linguistic and cultural contexts: Baidu and Google. We find differences between the two search engines in the way they suppress or modify original queries. Our study highlights the need for more refined, culturally sensitive moderation strategies in current language technologies.
• Score: 3.5016560416031886
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting. Online search engine auto-completions make it faster for users to search and access information. However, they also have the potential to reinforce and promote stereotypes and negative opinions about a variety of social groups. We study the characteristics of search auto-completions in two different linguistic and cultural contexts: Baidu and Google. We find differences between the two search engines in the way they suppress or modify original queries, and we highlight a concerning presence of negative suggestions across all social groups. Our study highlights the need for more refined, culturally sensitive moderation strategies in current language technologies.

Related papers

• User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
  We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search. We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results. More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z)
• Explaining Search Result Stances to Opinionated People [0.0]
  We investigate whether stance labels and their explanations can help users consume more diverse search results. We find that stance labels and explanations lead to a more diverse search result consumption. However, we do not find evidence for systematic opinion change among users in this context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T15:08:24Z)
• Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines [70.59477647085387]
  Generative search engines directly generate responses to user queries, along with in-line citations. We conduct human evaluation to audit four popular generative search engines. We find that responses from existing generative search engines are fluent and appear informative, but frequently contain unsupported statements and inaccurate citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T17:56:12Z)
• A "Perspectival" Mirror of the Elephant: Investigating Language Bias on Google, ChatGPT, YouTube, and Wikipedia [0.0]
  This paper presents evidence and analysis of language bias and discusses its larger social implications. We find that Google and its most prominent returned results simply reflect a narrow set of culturally dominant views tied to the search language for complex topics like "Buddhism," "Liberalism," "colonization," "Iran" and "America" Language bias sets a strong yet invisible cultural barrier online, where each language group thinks they can see other groups through searches, but in fact, what they see is their own reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T19:49:58Z)
• Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflage [64.78260098263489]
  Twisting and camouflaging keywords are among the most used techniques to evade platform content moderation systems. This article contributes significantly to countering malicious information by developing multilingual tools to simulate and detect new methods of evasion of content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-27T16:08:49Z)
• A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformers [66.9176610388952]
  We present the fundamentals behind the next version of the Perspective API from Google Jigsaw. At the heart of the approach is a single multilingual token-free Charformer model. We demonstrate that by forgoing static vocabularies, we gain flexibility across a variety of settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T20:55:31Z)
• Diversity driven Query Rewriting in Search Advertising [1.5289756643078838]
  generative retrieval models have been shown to be effective at the task of generating such query rewrites. We introduce CLOVER, a framework to generate both high-quality and diverse rewrites. We empirically show the effectiveness of our proposed approach through offline experiments on search queries across geographies spanning three major languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:30:45Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• Search Engine Similarity Analysis: A Combined Content and Rankings Approach [6.69087470775851]
  We present an analysis of the affinity of the two major search engines, Google and Bing, along with DuckDuckGo. We developed a new similarity metric that leverages both the content and the ranking of search responses. We found that Google stands apart, but Bing and DuckDuckGo are largely indistinguishable from each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T23:57:24Z)
• On the Social and Technical Challenges of Web Search Autosuggestion Moderation [118.47867428272878]
  Autosuggestions are typically generated by machine learning (ML) systems trained on a corpus of search logs and document representations. While current search engines have become increasingly proficient at suppressing such problematic suggestions, there are still persistent issues that remain. We discuss several dimensions of problematic suggestions, difficult issues along the pipeline, and why our discussion applies to the increasing number of applications beyond web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T19:22:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.