OARelatedWork: A Large-Scale Dataset of Related Work Sections with Full-texts from Open Access Sources

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01930v1
• Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 08:49:22 GMT
• Title: OARelatedWork: A Large-Scale Dataset of Related Work Sections with Full-texts from Open Access Sources
• Authors: Martin Docekal, Martin Fajcik, Pavel Smrz,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces OARelatedWork, the first large-scale multi-document summarization dataset for related work generation. It includes 94 450 papers and 5 824 689 unique referenced papers. We show that the estimated upper bound for extractive summarization increases by 217% in the ROUGE-2 score, when using full content instead of abstracts.
• Score: 3.371205304404334
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces OARelatedWork, the first large-scale multi-document summarization dataset for related work generation containing whole related work sections and full-texts of cited papers. The dataset includes 94 450 papers and 5 824 689 unique referenced papers. It was designed for the task of automatically generating related work to shift the field toward generating entire related work sections from all available content instead of generating parts of related work sections from abstracts only, which is the current mainstream in this field for abstractive approaches. We show that the estimated upper bound for extractive summarization increases by 217% in the ROUGE-2 score, when using full content instead of abstracts. Furthermore, we show the benefits of full content data on naive, oracle, traditional, and transformer-based baselines. Long outputs, such as related work sections, pose challenges for automatic evaluation metrics like BERTScore due to their limited input length. We tackle this issue by proposing and evaluating a meta-metric using BERTScore. Despite operating on smaller blocks, we show this meta-metric correlates with human judgment, comparably to the original BERTScore.

Related papers

• The Power of Summary-Source Alignments [62.76959473193149]
  Multi-document summarization (MDS) is a challenging task, often decomposed to subtasks of salience and redundancy detection. alignment of corresponding sentences between a reference summary and its source documents has been leveraged to generate training data. This paper proposes extending the summary-source alignment framework by applying it at the more fine-grained proposition span level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T19:35:19Z)
• On Task-personalized Multimodal Few-shot Learning for Visually-rich Document Entity Retrieval [59.25292920967197]
  Few-shot document entity retrieval (VDER) is an important topic in industrial NLP applications. FewVEX is a new dataset to boost future research in the field of entity-level few-shot VDER. We present a task-aware meta-learning based framework, with a central focus on achieving effective task personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T17:51:43Z)
• Abstractive Summarization of Large Document Collections Using GPT [1.8130068086063336]
  This paper proposes a method of abstractive summarization designed to scale to document collections instead of individual documents. Our approach applies a combination of semantic clustering, document size reduction within topic clusters, semantic chunking of a cluster's documents, GPT-based summarization and concatenation, and a combined sentiment and text visualization of each topic to support exploratory data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T13:06:21Z)
• Modeling Entities as Semantic Points for Visual Information Extraction in the Wild [55.91783742370978]
  We propose an alternative approach to precisely and robustly extract key information from document images. We explicitly model entities as semantic points, i.e., center points of entities are enriched with semantic information describing the attributes and relationships of different entities. The proposed method can achieve significantly enhanced performance on entity labeling and linking, compared with previous state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T08:21:16Z)
• Generating a Structured Summary of Numerous Academic Papers: Dataset and Method [20.90939310713561]
  We propose BigSurvey, the first large-scale dataset for generating comprehensive summaries of numerous academic papers on each topic. We collect target summaries from more than seven thousand survey papers and utilize their 430 thousand reference papers' abstracts as input documents. To organize the diverse content from dozens of input documents, we propose a summarization method named category-based alignment and sparse transformer (CAST)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T11:42:07Z)
• ReSel: N-ary Relation Extraction from Scientific Text and Tables by Learning to Retrieve and Select [53.071352033539526]
  We study the problem of extracting N-ary relations from scientific articles. Our proposed method ReSel decomposes this task into a two-stage procedure. Our experiments on three scientific information extraction datasets show that ReSel outperforms state-of-the-art baselines significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T02:28:02Z)
• iFacetSum: Coreference-based Interactive Faceted Summarization for Multi-Document Exploration [63.272359227081836]
  iFacetSum integrates interactive summarization together with faceted search. Fine-grained facets are automatically produced based on cross-document coreference pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T20:01:11Z)
• AgreeSum: Agreement-Oriented Multi-Document Summarization [3.4743618614284113]
  Given a cluster of articles, the goal is to provide abstractive summaries that represent information common and faithful to all input articles. We create a dataset for AgreeSum, and provide annotations on articlesummary entailment relations for a subset of the clusters in the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T06:17:49Z)
• Topic-Centric Unsupervised Multi-Document Summarization of Scientific and News Articles [3.0504782036247438]
  We propose a topic-centric unsupervised multi-document summarization framework to generate abstractive summaries. The proposed algorithm generates an abstractive summary by developing salient language unit selection and text generation techniques. Our approach matches the state-of-the-art when evaluated on automated extractive evaluation metrics and performs better for abstractive summarization on five human evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T04:04:21Z)
• Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation with Distant Supervision [69.15410325679635]
  We propose a new generation task called Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation (PADTG) It is more practical since it utilizes automatically annotated data for training and thus considerably expands the application domains. Our framework outperforms all baseline models as well as verify the feasibility of utilizing partially-aligned data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T03:18:52Z)
• A Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset from the Wikipedia Current Events Portal [10.553314461761968]
  Multi-document summarization (MDS) aims to compress the content in large document collections into short summaries. This work presents a new dataset for MDS that is large both in the total number of document clusters and in the size of individual clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T14:33:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.