The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02411v1
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 18:12:39 GMT
- Title: The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologies
- Authors: Diyi Yang, Dirk Hovy, David Jurgens, Barbara Plank,
- Abstract summary: We argue that many of these issues share a common core: a lack of awareness of the factors, context, and implications of the social environment in which NLP operates.
We argue that substantial challenges remain for NLP to develop social awareness and that we are just at the beginning of a new era for the field.
- Score: 94.6762219597438
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Language technologies have made enormous progress, especially with the introduction of large language models (LLMs). On traditional tasks such as machine translation and sentiment analysis, these models perform at near-human level. These advances can, however, exacerbate a variety of issues that models have traditionally struggled with, such as bias, evaluation, and risks. In this position paper, we argue that many of these issues share a common core: a lack of awareness of the factors, context, and implications of the social environment in which NLP operates, which we call social awareness. While NLP is getting better at solving the formal linguistic aspects, limited progress has been made in adding the social awareness required for language applications to work in all situations for all users. Integrating social awareness into NLP models will make applications more natural, helpful, and safe, and will open up new possibilities. Thus we argue that substantial challenges remain for NLP to develop social awareness and that we are just at the beginning of a new era for the field.
Related papers
- A Capabilities Approach to Studying Bias and Harm in Language Technologies [4.135516576952934]
We consider fairness, bias, and inclusion in Language Technologies through the lens of the Capabilities Approach.
The Capabilities Approach centers on what people are capable of achieving, given their intersectional social, political, and economic contexts.
We detail the Capabilities Approach, its relationship to multilingual and multicultural evaluation, and how the framework affords meaningful collaboration with community members in defining and measuring the harms of Language Technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T22:46:13Z) - Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal.
We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z) - Social Skill Training with Large Language Models [65.40795606463101]
People rely on social skills like conflict resolution to communicate effectively and to thrive in both work and personal life.
This perspective paper identifies social skill barriers to enter specialized fields.
We present a solution that leverages large language models for social skill training via a generic framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-05T16:29:58Z) - SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents [107.4138224020773]
We present SOTOPIA, an open-ended environment to simulate complex social interactions between artificial agents and humans.
In our environment, agents role-play and interact under a wide variety of scenarios; they coordinate, collaborate, exchange, and compete with each other to achieve complex social goals.
We find that GPT-4 achieves a significantly lower goal completion rate than humans and struggles to exhibit social commonsense reasoning and strategic communication skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T02:27:01Z) - Systematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the
World's Languages [94.65681336393425]
We introduce a framework for estimating the global utility of language technologies.
Our analyses involve the field at large, but also more in-depth studies on both user-facing technologies and more linguistic NLP tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T14:03:07Z) - SocialAI: Benchmarking Socio-Cognitive Abilities in Deep Reinforcement
Learning Agents [23.719833581321033]
Building embodied autonomous agents capable of participating in social interactions with humans is one of the main challenges in AI.
We argue that aiming towards human-level AI requires a broader set of key social skills.
We present SocialAI, a benchmark to assess the acquisition of social skills of DRL agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-02T10:39:18Z) - How Good Is NLP? A Sober Look at NLP Tasks through the Lens of Social
Impact [31.435252562175194]
We propose a framework to evaluate NLP tasks' direct and indirect real-world impact.
We adopt the methodology of global priorities research to identify priority causes for NLP research.
Finally, we use our theoretical framework to provide some practical guidelines for future NLP research for social good.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-04T09:17:15Z) - SocialAI 0.1: Towards a Benchmark to Stimulate Research on
Socio-Cognitive Abilities in Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents [23.719833581321033]
Building embodied autonomous agents capable of participating in social interactions with humans is one of the main challenges in AI.
Current approaches focus on language as a communication tool in very simplified and non diverse social situations.
We argue that aiming towards human-level AI requires a broader set of key social skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-27T14:16:29Z) - Experience Grounds Language [185.73483760454454]
Language understanding research is held back by a failure to relate language to the physical world it describes and to the social interactions it facilitates.
Despite the incredible effectiveness of language processing models to tackle tasks after being trained on text alone, successful linguistic communication relies on a shared experience of the world.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T16:56:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.