Axiomatic Causal Interventions for Reverse Engineering Relevance Computation in Neural Retrieval Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02503v1
• Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 22:30:15 GMT
• Title: Axiomatic Causal Interventions for Reverse Engineering Relevance Computation in Neural Retrieval Models
• Authors: Catherine Chen, Jack Merullo, Carsten Eickhoff,
• Abstract summary: We propose the use of causal interventions to reverse engineer neural rankers. We demonstrate how mechanistic interpretability methods can be used to isolate components satisfying term-frequency axioms.
• Score: 20.29451537633895
• License:
• Abstract: Neural models have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse ranking tasks. However, the processes and internal mechanisms along which they determine relevance are still largely unknown. Existing approaches for analyzing neural ranker behavior with respect to IR properties rely either on assessing overall model behavior or employing probing methods that may offer an incomplete understanding of causal mechanisms. To provide a more granular understanding of internal model decision-making processes, we propose the use of causal interventions to reverse engineer neural rankers, and demonstrate how mechanistic interpretability methods can be used to isolate components satisfying term-frequency axioms within a ranking model. We identify a group of attention heads that detect duplicate tokens in earlier layers of the model, then communicate with downstream heads to compute overall document relevance. More generally, we propose that this style of mechanistic analysis opens up avenues for reverse engineering the processes neural retrieval models use to compute relevance. This work aims to initiate granular interpretability efforts that will not only benefit retrieval model development and training, but ultimately ensure safer deployment of these models.

Related papers

• Revisiting Spurious Correlation in Domain Generalization [12.745076668687748]
  We build a structural causal model (SCM) to describe the causality within data generation process. We further conduct a thorough analysis of the mechanisms underlying spurious correlation. In this regard, we propose to control confounding bias in OOD generalization by introducing a propensity score weighted estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T13:22:00Z)
• Demolition and Reinforcement of Memories in Spin-Glass-like Neural Networks [0.0]
  The aim of this thesis is to understand the effectiveness of Unlearning in both associative memory models and generative models. The selection of structured data enables an associative memory model to retrieve concepts as attractors of a neural dynamics with considerable basins of attraction. A novel regularization technique for Boltzmann Machines is presented, proving to outperform previously developed methods in learning hidden probability distributions from data-sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T23:12:42Z)
• Unraveling Feature Extraction Mechanisms in Neural Networks [10.13842157577026]
  We propose a theoretical approach based on Neural Tangent Kernels (NTKs) to investigate such mechanisms. We reveal how these models leverage statistical features during gradient descent and how they are integrated into final decisions. We find that while self-attention and CNN models may exhibit limitations in learning n-grams, multiplication-based models seem to excel in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T04:22:40Z)
• Causal Analysis for Robust Interpretability of Neural Networks [0.2519906683279152]
  We develop a robust interventional-based method to capture cause-effect mechanisms in pre-trained neural networks. We apply our method to vision models trained on classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T18:37:24Z)
• Less is More: Mitigate Spurious Correlations for Open-Domain Dialogue Response Generation Models by Causal Discovery [52.95935278819512]
  We conduct the first study on spurious correlations for open-domain response generation models based on a corpus CGDIALOG curated in our work. Inspired by causal discovery algorithms, we propose a novel model-agnostic method for training and inference of response generation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T06:33:48Z)
• Entity-Conditioned Question Generation for Robust Attention Distribution in Neural Information Retrieval [51.53892300802014]
  We show that supervised neural information retrieval models are prone to learning sparse attention patterns over passage tokens. Using a novel targeted synthetic data generation method, we teach neural IR to attend more uniformly and robustly to all entities in a given passage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T22:36:48Z)
• EINNs: Epidemiologically-Informed Neural Networks [75.34199997857341]
  We introduce a new class of physics-informed neural networks-EINN-crafted for epidemic forecasting. We investigate how to leverage both the theoretical flexibility provided by mechanistic models as well as the data-driven expressability afforded by AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:59:03Z)
• Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
  We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process. Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting. We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z)
• Recovering Quantitative Models of Human Information Processing with Differentiable Architecture Search [0.3384279376065155]
  We introduce an open-source pipeline for the automated construction of quantitative models. We find that these methods are capable of recovering basic quantitative motifs from models of psychophysics, learning and decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-25T16:00:23Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Rethinking Generalization of Neural Models: A Named Entity Recognition Case Study [81.11161697133095]
  We take the NER task as a testbed to analyze the generalization behavior of existing models from different perspectives. Experiments with in-depth analyses diagnose the bottleneck of existing neural NER models. As a by-product of this paper, we have open-sourced a project that involves a comprehensive summary of recent NER papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-12T04:33:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.