POV Learning: Individual Alignment of Multimodal Models using Human Perception
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04443v1
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 16:07:29 GMT
- Title: POV Learning: Individual Alignment of Multimodal Models using Human Perception
- Authors: Simon Werner, Katharina Christ, Laura Bernardy, Marion G. Müller, Achim Rettinger,
- Abstract summary: We argue that alignment on an individual level can boost the subjective predictive performance for the individual user interacting with the system.
We test this, by integrating perception information into machine learning systems and measuring their predictive performance.
Our findings suggest that exploiting individual perception signals for the machine learning of subjective human assessments provides a valuable cue for individual alignment.
- Score: 1.4796543791607086
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Aligning machine learning systems with human expectations is mostly attempted by training with manually vetted human behavioral samples, typically explicit feedback. This is done on a population level since the context that is capturing the subjective Point-Of-View (POV) of a concrete person in a specific situational context is not retained in the data. However, we argue that alignment on an individual level can boost the subjective predictive performance for the individual user interacting with the system considerably. Since perception differs for each person, the same situation is observed differently. Consequently, the basis for decision making and the subsequent reasoning processes and observable reactions differ. We hypothesize that individual perception patterns can be used for improving the alignment on an individual level. We test this, by integrating perception information into machine learning systems and measuring their predictive performance wrt.~individual subjective assessments. For our empirical study, we collect a novel data set of multimodal stimuli and corresponding eye tracking sequences for the novel task of Perception-Guided Crossmodal Entailment and tackle it with our Perception-Guided Multimodal Transformer. Our findings suggest that exploiting individual perception signals for the machine learning of subjective human assessments provides a valuable cue for individual alignment. It does not only improve the overall predictive performance from the point-of-view of the individual user but might also contribute to steering AI systems towards every person's individual expectations and values.
Related papers
- Democratizing Reward Design for Personal and Representative Value-Alignment [10.1630183955549]
We introduce Interactive-Reflective Dialogue Alignment, a method that iteratively engages users in reflecting on and specifying their subjective value definitions.
This system learns individual value definitions through language-model-based preference elicitation and constructs personalized reward models.
Our findings demonstrate diverse definitions of value-aligned behaviour and show that our system can accurately capture each person's unique understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T16:37:01Z) - When Does Perceptual Alignment Benefit Vision Representations? [76.32336818860965]
We investigate how aligning vision model representations to human perceptual judgments impacts their usability.
We find that aligning models to perceptual judgments yields representations that improve upon the original backbones across many downstream tasks.
Our results suggest that injecting an inductive bias about human perceptual knowledge into vision models can contribute to better representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:59:58Z) - Whose Preferences? Differences in Fairness Preferences and Their Impact on the Fairness of AI Utilizing Human Feedback [8.04095222893591]
We find significant gaps in fairness preferences depending on the race, age, political stance, educational level, and LGBTQ+ identity of annotators.
We also demonstrate that demographics mentioned in text have a strong influence on how users perceive individual fairness in moderation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T19:42:25Z) - What Makes Pre-Trained Visual Representations Successful for Robust
Manipulation? [57.92924256181857]
We find that visual representations designed for manipulation and control tasks do not necessarily generalize under subtle changes in lighting and scene texture.
We find that emergent segmentation ability is a strong predictor of out-of-distribution generalization among ViT models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T18:09:08Z) - Learning Transferable Pedestrian Representation from Multimodal
Information Supervision [174.5150760804929]
VAL-PAT is a novel framework that learns transferable representations to enhance various pedestrian analysis tasks with multimodal information.
We first perform pre-training on LUPerson-TA dataset, where each image contains text and attribute annotations.
We then transfer the learned representations to various downstream tasks, including person reID, person attribute recognition and text-based person search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-12T01:20:58Z) - CIAO! A Contrastive Adaptation Mechanism for Non-Universal Facial
Expression Recognition [80.07590100872548]
We propose Contrastive Inhibitory Adaptati On (CIAO), a mechanism that adapts the last layer of facial encoders to depict specific affective characteristics on different datasets.
CIAO presents an improvement in facial expression recognition performance over six different datasets with very unique affective representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-10T15:46:05Z) - Vision-Based Manipulators Need to Also See from Their Hands [58.398637422321976]
We study how the choice of visual perspective affects learning and generalization in the context of physical manipulation from raw sensor observations.
We find that a hand-centric (eye-in-hand) perspective affords reduced observability, but it consistently improves training efficiency and out-of-distribution generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-15T18:46:18Z) - Beyond Tracking: Using Deep Learning to Discover Novel Interactions in
Biological Swarms [3.441021278275805]
We propose training deep network models to predict system-level states directly from generic graphical features from the entire view.
Because the resulting predictive models are not based on human-understood predictors, we use explanatory modules.
This represents an example of augmented intelligence in behavioral ecology -- knowledge co-creation in a human-AI team.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-20T22:50:41Z) - TRiPOD: Human Trajectory and Pose Dynamics Forecasting in the Wild [77.59069361196404]
TRiPOD is a novel method for predicting body dynamics based on graph attentional networks.
To incorporate a real-world challenge, we learn an indicator representing whether an estimated body joint is visible/invisible at each frame.
Our evaluation shows that TRiPOD outperforms all prior work and state-of-the-art specifically designed for each of the trajectory and pose forecasting tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-08T20:01:00Z) - Model-agnostic Fits for Understanding Information Seeking Patterns in
Humans [0.0]
In decision making tasks under uncertainty, humans display characteristic biases in seeking, integrating, and acting upon information relevant to the task.
Here, we reexamine data from previous carefully designed experiments, collected at scale, that measured and catalogued these biases in aggregate form.
We design deep learning models that replicate these biases in aggregate, while also capturing individual variation in behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-09T04:34:58Z) - Person Perception Biases Exposed: Revisiting the First Impressions
Dataset [26.412669618149106]
This work revisits the ChaLearn First Impressions database, annotated for personality perception using pairwise comparisons via crowdsourcing.
We reveal existing person perception biases associated to perceived attributes like gender, ethnicity, age and face attractiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T15:41:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.