Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation for Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04793v1
• Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 03:57:45 GMT
• Title: Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation for Text
• Authors: Amrita Bhattacharjee, Raha Moraffah, Joshua Garland, Huan Liu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a structured way to utilize large language models (LLMs) as general purpose counterfactual example generators. We demonstrate the efficacy of LLMs as zero-shot counterfactual generators in evaluating and explaining black-box NLP models.
• Score: 15.254775341371364
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Counterfactual examples are frequently used for model development and evaluation in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Although methods for automated counterfactual generation have been explored, such methods depend on models such as pre-trained language models that are then fine-tuned on auxiliary, often task-specific datasets. Collecting and annotating such datasets for counterfactual generation is labor intensive and therefore, infeasible in practice. Therefore, in this work, we focus on a novel problem setting: \textit{zero-shot counterfactual generation}. To this end, we propose a structured way to utilize large language models (LLMs) as general purpose counterfactual example generators. We hypothesize that the instruction-following and textual understanding capabilities of recent LLMs can be effectively leveraged for generating high quality counterfactuals in a zero-shot manner, without requiring any training or fine-tuning. Through comprehensive experiments on various downstream tasks in natural language processing (NLP), we demonstrate the efficacy of LLMs as zero-shot counterfactual generators in evaluating and explaining black-box NLP models.

Related papers

• REFINE-AF: A Task-Agnostic Framework to Align Language Models via Self-Generated Instructions using Reinforcement Learning from Automated Feedback [9.374858922055257]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven effective in numerous few-shot or zero-shot Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks.<n>Previous research endeavors have attempted to address this challenge by proposing frameworks capable of generating instructions directly from the model itself.<n>This paper explores the performance of three open-source small LLMs using a semi-automated framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T07:23:19Z)
• Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration [90.41908331897639]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly benefited from training on diverse, high-quality task-specific data. We present a novel approach, ReverseGen, designed to automatically generate effective training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T06:43:28Z)
• Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities. In-Context Learning (ICL) and. Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting. LLMs to downstream tasks. We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Evolving Knowledge Distillation with Large Language Models and Active Learning [46.85430680828938]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various NLP tasks. Previous research has attempted to distill the knowledge of LLMs into smaller models by generating annotated data. We propose EvoKD: Evolving Knowledge Distillation, which leverages the concept of active learning to interactively enhance the process of data generation using large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T03:55:24Z)
• AXOLOTL: Fairness through Assisted Self-Debiasing of Large Language Model Outputs [20.772266479533776]
  AXOLOTL is a novel post-processing framework that operates agnostically across tasks and models. It identifies biases, proposes resolutions, and guides the model to self-debias its outputs. This approach minimizes computational costs and preserves model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T00:02:37Z)
• Towards Modeling Learner Performance with Large Language Models [7.002923425715133]
  This paper investigates whether the pattern recognition and sequence modeling capabilities of LLMs can be extended to the domain of knowledge tracing. We compare two approaches to using LLMs for this task, zero-shot prompting and model fine-tuning, with existing, non-LLM approaches to knowledge tracing. While LLM-based approaches do not achieve state-of-the-art performance, fine-tuned LLMs surpass the performance of naive baseline models and perform on par with standard Bayesian Knowledge Tracing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T14:06:34Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• LLM Augmented LLMs: Expanding Capabilities through Composition [56.40953749310957]
  CALM -- Composition to Augment Language Models -- introduces cross-attention between models to compose their representations and enable new capabilities. We illustrate that augmenting PaLM2-S with a smaller model trained on low-resource languages results in an absolute improvement of up to 13% on tasks like translation into English. When PaLM2-S is augmented with a code-specific model, we see a relative improvement of 40% over the base model for code generation and explanation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T18:53:01Z)
• Language models are weak learners [71.33837923104808]
  We show that prompt-based large language models can operate effectively as weak learners. We incorporate these models into a boosting approach, which can leverage the knowledge within the model to outperform traditional tree-based boosting. Results illustrate the potential for prompt-based LLMs to function not just as few-shot learners themselves, but as components of larger machine learning pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T02:39:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.