From LLMs to Actions: Latent Codes as Bridges in Hierarchical Robot Control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04798v2
• Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 21:02:37 GMT
• Title: From LLMs to Actions: Latent Codes as Bridges in Hierarchical Robot Control
• Authors: Yide Shentu, Philipp Wu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Pieter Abbeel,
• Abstract summary: We introduce our method -- Learnable Latent Codes as Bridges (LCB) -- as an alternate architecture to overcome limitations. We find that methodoutperforms baselines that leverage pure language as the interface layer on tasks that require reasoning and multi-step behaviors.
• Score: 58.72492647570062
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Hierarchical control for robotics has long been plagued by the need to have a well defined interface layer to communicate between high-level task planners and low-level policies. With the advent of LLMs, language has been emerging as a prospective interface layer. However, this has several limitations. Not all tasks can be decomposed into steps that are easily expressible in natural language (e.g. performing a dance routine). Further, it makes end-to-end finetuning on embodied data challenging due to domain shift and catastrophic forgetting. We introduce our method -- Learnable Latent Codes as Bridges (LCB) -- as an alternate architecture to overcome these limitations. \method~uses a learnable latent code to act as a bridge between LLMs and low-level policies. This enables LLMs to flexibly communicate goals in the task plan without being entirely constrained by language limitations. Additionally, it enables end-to-end finetuning without destroying the embedding space of word tokens learned during pre-training. Through experiments on Language Table and Calvin, two common language based benchmarks for embodied agents, we find that \method~outperforms baselines (including those w/ GPT-4V) that leverage pure language as the interface layer on tasks that require reasoning and multi-step behaviors.

Related papers

• Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making. Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance. We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z)
• Plan-Seq-Learn: Language Model Guided RL for Solving Long Horizon Robotics Tasks [50.27313829438866]
  Plan-Seq-Learn (PSL) is a modular approach that uses motion planning to bridge the gap between abstract language and learned low-level control. PSL achieves success rates of over 85%, out-performing language-based, classical, and end-to-end approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:31Z)
• Empowering Large Language Models on Robotic Manipulation with Affordance Prompting [23.318449345424725]
  Large language models fail to interact with the physical world by generating control sequences properly. Existing LLM-based approaches circumvent this problem by relying on additional pre-defined skills or pre-trained sub-policies. We propose a framework called LLM+A(ffordance) where the LLM serves as both the sub-task planner and the motion controller.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T03:06:32Z)
• Grounding Language Plans in Demonstrations Through Counterfactual Perturbations [25.19071357445557]
  Grounding the common-sense reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) in physical domains remains a pivotal yet unsolved problem for embodied AI. We show our approach improves the interpretability and reactivity of imitation learning through 2D navigation and simulated and real robot manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:04:59Z)
• Natural Language as Policies: Reasoning for Coordinate-Level Embodied Control with LLMs [7.746160514029531]
  We demonstrate experimental results with LLMs that address robotics task planning problems. Our approach acquires text descriptions of the task and scene objects, then formulates task planning through natural language reasoning. Our approach is evaluated on a multi-modal prompt simulation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:58:12Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkers [20.857692296678632]
  For effective human-robot interaction, robots need to understand, plan, and execute complex, long-horizon tasks. Recent advances in large language models have shown promise for translating natural language into robot action sequences. We show that our approach outperforms several methods using LLMs as planners in complex task domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T21:58:29Z)
• Plan, Eliminate, and Track -- Language Models are Good Teachers for Embodied Agents [99.17668730578586]
  Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) capture procedural knowledge about the world. Plan, Eliminate, and Track (PET) framework translates a task description into a list of high-level sub-tasks. PET framework leads to a significant 15% improvement over SOTA for generalization to human goal specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T20:11:22Z)
• Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents [111.33545170562337]
  We investigate the possibility of grounding high-level tasks, expressed in natural language, to a chosen set of actionable steps. We find that if pre-trained LMs are large enough and prompted appropriately, they can effectively decompose high-level tasks into low-level plans. We propose a procedure that conditions on existing demonstrations and semantically translates the plans to admissible actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T18:59:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.