T-curator: a trust based curation tool for LOD logs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07081v1
• Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 19:32:27 GMT
• Title: T-curator: a trust based curation tool for LOD logs
• Authors: Dihia Lanasri,
• Abstract summary: SPARQL query logs can present an asset for decision makers. A naive and straightforward use of these logs is too risky because their provenance and quality are highly questionable. We propose an interactive and intuitive trust based tool that can be used to curate these LOD logs before exploiting them.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Nowadays, companies are racing towards Linked Open Data (LOD) to improve their added value, but they are ignoring their SPARQL query logs. If well curated, these logs can present an asset for decision makers. A naive and straightforward use of these logs is too risky because their provenance and quality are highly questionable. Users of these logs in a trusted way have to be assisted by providing them with in-depth knowledge of the whole LOD environment and tools to curate these logs. In this paper, we propose an interactive and intuitive trust based tool that can be used to curate these LOD logs before exploiting them. This tool is proposed to support our approach proposed in our previous work Lanasri et al. [2020].

Related papers

• End-to-End Automated Logging via Multi-Agent Framework [35.280199418859034]
  Existing automated logging tools often overlook the fundamental whether-to-log decision.<n>We propose Autologger, a novel hybrid framework that addresses the complete end-to-end logging pipeline.<n>In an end-to-end setting, Autologger improves the overall quality of generated logging statements by 16.13% over the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T16:45:30Z)
• Log-Augmented Generation: Scaling Test-Time Reasoning with Reusable Computation [80.69067017594709]
  Large language models (LLMs) and their agentic counterparts struggle to retain reasoning from previous tasks.<n>We propose a novel framework, log-augmented generation (LAG) that directly reuses prior computation and reasoning from past logs at test time.<n>Our method significantly outperforms standard agentic systems that do not utilize logs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T14:14:38Z)
• Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains. This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z)
• LUNAR: Unsupervised LLM-based Log Parsing [34.344687402936835]
  We propose LUNAR, an unsupervised-based method for efficient and off-the-shelf log parsing. Our key insight is that while LLMs may struggle with direct log parsing, their performance can be significantly enhanced through comparative analysis. Experiments on large-scale public datasets demonstrate that LUNAR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art log crafts in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T11:32:01Z)
• Stronger, Cheaper and Demonstration-Free Log Parsing with LLMs [18.240096266464544]
  We propose LogBatcher, a cost-effective LLM-based log that requires no training process or labeled data. We have conducted experiments on 16 public log datasets and the results show that LogBatcher is effective for log parsing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T10:39:28Z)
• End-to-end solution for linked open data query logs analytics [0.0]
  Deep understanding of users provides useful knowledge which can influence strongly decision-making. In this work, we want to extract valuable information from Linked Open Data (LOD) query-logs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T21:29:40Z)
• LogFormer: A Pre-train and Tuning Pipeline for Log Anomaly Detection [73.69399219776315]
  We propose a unified Transformer-based framework for Log anomaly detection (LogFormer) to improve the generalization ability across different domains. Specifically, our model is first pre-trained on the source domain to obtain shared semantic knowledge of log data. Then, we transfer such knowledge to the target domain via shared parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T12:55:21Z)
• A Large-Scale Evaluation for Log Parsing Techniques: How Far Are We? [42.56249610409624]
  We provide a new collection of annotated log datasets, denoted Loghub-2.0, which can better reflect the characteristics of log data in real-world software systems. We conduct a thorough re-evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art logs in a more rigorous and practical setting. Particularly, we introduce a new evaluation metric to mitigate the sensitivity of existing metrics to imbalanced data distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:24:15Z)
• Log Parsing Evaluation in the Era of Modern Software Systems [47.370291246632114]
  We focus on one integral part of automated log analysis, log parsing, which is the prerequisite to deriving any insights from logs. Our investigation reveals problematic aspects within the log parsing field, particularly its inefficiency in handling heterogeneous real-world logs. We propose a tool, Logchimera, that enables estimating log parsing performance in industry contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T14:19:22Z)
• Exploring the Effectiveness of LLMs in Automated Logging Generation: An Empirical Study [32.53659676826846]
  This paper performs the first study on exploring large language models (LLMs) for logging statement generation. We first build a logging statement generation dataset, LogBench, with two parts: (1) LogBench-O: logging statements collected from GitHub repositories, and (2) LogBench-T: the transformed unseen code from LogBench-O.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T06:32:51Z)
• LogLAB: Attention-Based Labeling of Log Data Anomalies via Weak Supervision [63.08516384181491]
  We present LogLAB, a novel modeling approach for automated labeling of log messages without requiring manual work by experts. Our method relies on estimated failure time windows provided by monitoring systems to produce precise labeled datasets in retrospect. Our evaluation shows that LogLAB consistently outperforms nine benchmark approaches across three different datasets and maintains an F1-score of more than 0.98 even at large failure time windows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:16:08Z)
• Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
  Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records. Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction. We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.