Similarity and Quality Metrics for MR Image-To-Image Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08431v4
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:25:31 GMT
• Title: Similarity and Quality Metrics for MR Image-To-Image Translation
• Authors: Melanie Dohmen, Mark Klemens, Ivo Baltruschat, Tuan Truong, Matthias Lenga,
• Abstract summary: We quantitatively analyze 11 similarity (reference) and 12 quality (non-reference) metrics for assessing synthetic images. We investigate the sensitivity regarding 11 kinds of distortions and typical MR artifacts, and analyze the influence of different normalization methods on each metric and distortion.
• Score: 0.8932296777085644
• License:
• Abstract: Image-to-image translation can create large impact in medical imaging, as images can be synthetically transformed to other modalities, sequence types, higher resolutions or lower noise levels. To ensure patient safety, these methods should be validated by human readers, which requires a considerable amount of time and costs. Quantitative metrics can effectively complement such studies and provide reproducible and objective assessment of synthetic images. If a reference is available, the similarity of MR images is frequently evaluated by SSIM and PSNR metrics, even though these metrics are not or too sensitive regarding specific distortions. When reference images to compare with are not available, non-reference quality metrics can reliably detect specific distortions, such as blurriness. To provide an overview on distortion sensitivity, we quantitatively analyze 11 similarity (reference) and 12 quality (non-reference) metrics for assessing synthetic images. We additionally include a metric on a downstream segmentation task. We investigate the sensitivity regarding 11 kinds of distortions and typical MR artifacts, and analyze the influence of different normalization methods on each metric and distortion. Finally, we derive recommendations for effective usage of the analyzed similarity and quality metrics for evaluation of image-to-image translation models.

Related papers

• A Deep-Learning-Based Label-free No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Metric: Application in Sodium MRI Denoising [0.0]
  New MRI techniques, such as sodium MRI, generally suffer from low image quality due to an inherently low signal. Deep learning models have a unique characteristic in that they are specialized to a characteristic training set. We propose a novel DL-based NR-IQA metric, the Model Metric (MSM), which does not depend on ground-truth images or labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T12:16:55Z)
• Five Pitfalls When Assessing Synthetic Medical Images with Reference Metrics [0.9582978458237521]
  Reference metrics have been developed to objectively and quantitatively compare two images. The correlation of reference metrics and human perception of quality can vary strongly for different kinds of distortions. We selected five pitfalls that showcase unexpected and probably undesired reference metric scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T11:48:57Z)
• K-Space-Aware Cross-Modality Score for Synthesized Neuroimage Quality Assessment [71.27193056354741]
  The problem of how to assess cross-modality medical image synthesis has been largely unexplored. We propose a new metric K-CROSS to spur progress on this challenging problem. K-CROSS uses a pre-trained multi-modality segmentation network to predict the lesion location.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T01:26:48Z)
• On Sensitivity and Robustness of Normalization Schemes to Input Distribution Shifts in Automatic MR Image Diagnosis [58.634791552376235]
  Deep Learning (DL) models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in diagnosing multiple diseases using reconstructed images as input. DL models are sensitive to varying artifacts as it leads to changes in the input data distribution between the training and testing phases. We propose to use other normalization techniques, such as Group Normalization and Layer Normalization, to inject robustness into model performance against varying image artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T03:09:03Z)
• Explainable Image Quality Assessment for Medical Imaging [0.0]
  Poor-quality medical images may lead to misdiagnosis. We propose an explainable image quality assessment system and validate our idea on two different objectives. We apply a variety of techniques to measure the faithfulness of the saliency detectors. We show that NormGrad has significant gains over other saliency detectors by reaching a repeated Pointing Game score of 0.853 for Object-CXR and 0.611 for LVOT datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T14:18:39Z)
• Evaluating the Quality and Diversity of DCGAN-based Generatively Synthesized Diabetic Retinopathy Imagery [0.07499722271664144]
  Publicly available diabetic retinopathy (DR) datasets are imbalanced, containing limited numbers of images with DR. The imbalance can be addressed using Geneversarative Adrial Networks (GANs) to augment the datasets with synthetic images. To evaluate the quality and diversity of synthetic images, several evaluation metrics, such as Multi-Scale Structural Similarity Index (MS-SSIM), Cosine Distance (CD), and Fr't Inception Distance (FID) are used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T23:50:01Z)
• Automated SSIM Regression for Detection and Quantification of Motion Artefacts in Brain MR Images [54.739076152240024]
  Motion artefacts in magnetic resonance brain images are a crucial issue. The assessment of MR image quality is fundamental before proceeding with the clinical diagnosis. An automated image quality assessment based on the structural similarity index (SSIM) regression has been proposed here.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T10:16:54Z)
• Image Quality Assessment for Magnetic Resonance Imaging [4.05136808278614]
  Image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms aim to reproduce the human's perception of the image quality. We use outputs of neural network models trained to solve problems relevant to MRI. Seven trained radiologists assess distorted images, with their verdicts then correlated with 35 different image quality metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T11:52:29Z)
• Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learning [50.265638572116984]
  We train a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using a contrastive pairwise objective to solve the auxiliary problem. We show through extensive experiments that CONTRIQUE achieves competitive performance when compared to state-of-the-art NR image quality models. Our results suggest that powerful quality representations with perceptual relevance can be obtained without requiring large labeled subjective image quality datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T21:01:00Z)
• Symmetry-Enhanced Attention Network for Acute Ischemic Infarct Segmentation with Non-Contrast CT Images [50.55978219682419]
  We propose a symmetry enhanced attention network (SEAN) for acute ischemic infarct segmentation. Our proposed network automatically transforms an input CT image into the standard space where the brain tissue is bilaterally symmetric. The proposed SEAN outperforms some symmetry-based state-of-the-art methods in terms of both dice coefficient and infarct localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T07:13:26Z)
• Towards Ultrafast MRI via Extreme k-Space Undersampling and Superresolution [65.25508348574974]
  We go below the MRI acceleration factors reported by all published papers that reference the original fastMRI challenge. We consider powerful deep learning based image enhancement methods to compensate for the underresolved images. The quality of the reconstructed images surpasses that of the other methods, yielding an MSE of 0.00114, a PSNR of 29.6 dB, and an SSIM of 0.956 at x16 acceleration factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T10:45:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.