Precarious Experiences: Citizens' Frustrations, Anxieties and Burdens of an Online Welfare Benefit System
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08515v1
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:37:29 GMT
- Title: Precarious Experiences: Citizens' Frustrations, Anxieties and Burdens of an Online Welfare Benefit System
- Authors: Colin Watson, Adam W Parnaby, Ahmed Kharrufa,
- Abstract summary: We report on a study of claimants using the UK's Universal Credit online welfare benefit system.
We expose claimants' own lived experiences interacting with this system.
The claimants explain how digital channels can contribute to an imbalance of power and agency.
- Score: 7.755302491684717
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: There is a significant overlap between people who are supported by income-related social welfare benefits, often in precarious situations, and those who experience greater digital exclusion. We report on a study of claimants using the UK's Universal Credit online welfare benefit system designed as, and still, "digital by default". Through data collection involving remote interviews (n=11) and online surveys (n=66), we expose claimants' own lived experiences interacting with this system. The claimants explain how digital channels can contribute to an imbalance of power and agency, at a time when their own circumstances mean they have reduced abilities, resources and capacities, and where design choices can adversely affect people's utility to leverage help from their own wider socio-technical ecosystems. We contribute eight recommendations from these accounts to inform the future design and development of digital welfare benefit systems for this population, to reduce digital barriers and harms.
Related papers
- Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Digital Accessibility for Medicaid Populations in Telehealth Adoption [3.4260542963866594]
The paper aims to explicate key factors behind digital accessibility for Medicaid populations and expounds robust solutions to eradicate these challenges.<n>The paper highlights the vitality of collaboration between healthcare professionals, policymakers, and tech developers in unveiling the accessibility and usability impediments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T22:15:13Z) - User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators [65.25721571688369]
In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators.
We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content.
These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-28T21:09:52Z) - Digital Wellbeing Redefined: Toward User-Centric Approach for Positive Social Media Engagement [4.37909887741567]
This paper introduces a new perspective centered around empowering positive social media experiences.
We present PauseNow, an innovative digital wellbeing intervention designed to align users' digital behaviors with their intentions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T23:26:07Z) - Causal Disentanglement for Regulating Social Influence Bias in Social
Recommendation [12.120586712440673]
Social recommendation systems face the problem of social influence bias, which can lead to an overemphasis on recommending items that friends have interacted with.
We propose a Causal Disentanglement-based framework for Regulating Social influence Bias in social recommendation, named CDRSB, to improve recommendation performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T09:48:48Z) - Do Digital Jobs Need an Image Filter? Factors Contributing to Negative
Attitudes [3.441021278275805]
We combined theories from both social psychology and information systems to investigate perceptions of digital jobs.
Individuals in digital professions were perceived as less favorably and as less hard-working than those in matched established jobs.
Digital jobs were also regarded as more threatening to societal values and less useful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-22T14:17:37Z) - A Comprehensive Picture of Factors Affecting User Willingness to Use
Mobile Health Applications [62.60524178293434]
The aim of this paper is to investigate the factors that influence user acceptance of mHealth apps.
Users' digital literacy has the strongest impact on their willingness to use them, followed by their online habit of sharing personal information.
Users' demographic background, such as their country of residence, age, ethnicity, and education, has a significant moderating effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T08:11:21Z) - D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling
Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases.
A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network.
For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z) - Imagining new futures beyond predictive systems in child welfare: A
qualitative study with impacted stakeholders [89.6319385008397]
We conducted a set of seven design workshops with 35 stakeholders who have been impacted by the child welfare system.
We found that participants worried current PRMs perpetuate or exacerbate existing problems in child welfare.
Participants suggested new ways to use data and data-driven tools to better support impacted communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-18T13:49:55Z) - Data Justice in Digital Social Welfare: A Study of the Rythu Bharosa
Scheme [0.0]
We use a data justice lens to study Rythu Bharosa, a social welfare scheme targeting farmers in the Andhra Pradesh state of India.
mismatches of recipients with their registered biometric credentials and bank account details are associated to denial of subsidies.
A second form is informational, as users who do not receive subsidies are often not informed of the reason why it is so.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-22T14:17:33Z) - Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of
Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past.
We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers.
These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z) - Exploring the Drivers and Barriers to Uptake for Digital Contact Tracing [0.5076419064097732]
Digital contact tracing has been deployed as a public health intervention to help suppress the spread of COVID-19.
Most governments have struggled with low uptake and participation rates, limiting the effectiveness of the tool.
This paper characterises a number of systems developed around the world, comparing the uptake rates for systems with different technology, data architectures, and mandates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T09:39:56Z) - Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and
Deployment [71.9309995623067]
NeurIPS 2020 requested that research paper submissions include impact statements on "potential nefarious uses and the consequences of failure"
We argue that frameworks of harms must be context-aware and consider a wider range of potential stakeholders, system affordances, as well as viable proxies for assessing harms in the widest sense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-26T18:09:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.