Ambiguous Annotations: When is a Pedestrian not a Pedestrian?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08794v1
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:44:34 GMT
• Title: Ambiguous Annotations: When is a Pedestrian not a Pedestrian?
• Authors: Luisa Schwirten, Jannes Scholz, Daniel Kondermann, Janis Keuper,
• Abstract summary: It is not always possible to objectively determine whether an assigned label is correct or not. Our experiments show that excluding highly ambiguous data from the training improves model performance. In order to safely remove ambiguous instances and ensure the retained representativeness of the training data, an understanding of the properties of the dataset and class under investigation is crucial.
• Score: 6.974741712647656
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Datasets labelled by human annotators are widely used in the training and testing of machine learning models. In recent years, researchers are increasingly paying attention to label quality. However, it is not always possible to objectively determine whether an assigned label is correct or not. The present work investigates this ambiguity in the annotation of autonomous driving datasets as an important dimension of data quality. Our experiments show that excluding highly ambiguous data from the training improves model performance of a state-of-the-art pedestrian detector in terms of LAMR, precision and F1 score, thereby saving training time and annotation costs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in order to safely remove ambiguous instances and ensure the retained representativeness of the training data, an understanding of the properties of the dataset and class under investigation is crucial.

Related papers

• TrajSSL: Trajectory-Enhanced Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection [59.498894868956306]
  Pseudo-labeling approaches to semi-supervised learning adopt a teacher-student framework. We leverage pre-trained motion-forecasting models to generate object trajectories on pseudo-labeled data. Our approach improves pseudo-label quality in two distinct manners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T05:35:00Z)
• Automatic Dataset Construction (ADC): Sample Collection, Data Curation, and Beyond [38.89457061559469]
  We propose an innovative methodology that automates dataset creation with negligible cost and high efficiency. We provide open-source software that incorporates existing methods for label error detection, robust learning under noisy and biased data. We design three benchmark datasets focused on label noise detection, label noise learning, and class-imbalanced learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T04:45:12Z)
• Self-Training with Pseudo-Label Scorer for Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction [54.23208041792073]
  Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction (ASQP) aims to predict all quads (aspect term, aspect category, opinion term, sentiment polarity) for a given review. A key challenge in the ASQP task is the scarcity of labeled data, which limits the performance of existing methods. We propose a self-training framework with a pseudo-label scorer, wherein a scorer assesses the match between reviews and their pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T05:30:21Z)
• Soft Curriculum for Learning Conditional GANs with Noisy-Labeled and Uncurated Unlabeled Data [70.25049762295193]
  We introduce a novel conditional image generation framework that accepts noisy-labeled and uncurated data during training. We propose soft curriculum learning, which assigns instance-wise weights for adversarial training while assigning new labels for unlabeled data. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms existing semi-supervised and label-noise robust methods in terms of both quantitative and qualitative performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T08:31:59Z)
• A Benchmark Generative Probabilistic Model for Weak Supervised Learning [2.0257616108612373]
  Weak Supervised Learning approaches have been developed to alleviate the annotation burden. We show that latent variable models (PLVMs) achieve state-of-the-art performance across four datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T07:06:24Z)
• Classification of datasets with imputed missing values: does imputation quality matter? [2.7646249774183]
  Classifying samples in incomplete datasets is non-trivial. We demonstrate how the commonly used measures for assessing quality are flawed. We propose a new class of discrepancy scores which focus on how well the method recreates the overall distribution of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T22:58:03Z)
• Debiased Pseudo Labeling in Self-Training [77.83549261035277]
  Deep neural networks achieve remarkable performances on a wide range of tasks with the aid of large-scale labeled datasets. To mitigate the requirement for labeled data, self-training is widely used in both academia and industry by pseudo labeling on readily-available unlabeled data. We propose Debiased, in which the generation and utilization of pseudo labels are decoupled by two independent heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T02:14:33Z)
• Enabling On-Device Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning With Selective Data Contrast [13.563747709789387]
  We propose a framework to automatically select the most representative data from the unlabeled input stream. Experiments show that accuracy and learning speed are greatly improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:04:56Z)
• Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning [75.34320911480008]
  Self-Tuning is a novel approach to enable data-efficient deep learning. It unifies the exploration of labeled and unlabeled data and the transfer of a pre-trained model. It outperforms its SSL and TL counterparts on five tasks by sharp margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T14:56:19Z)
• Diverse Complexity Measures for Dataset Curation in Self-driving [80.55417232642124]
  We propose a new data selection method that exploits a diverse set of criteria that quantize interestingness of traffic scenes. Our experiments show that the proposed curation pipeline is able to select datasets that lead to better generalization and higher performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-16T23:45:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.