Contextual Integrity Games

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09130v1
• Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 06:46:53 GMT
• Title: Contextual Integrity Games
• Authors: Ran Wolff,
• Abstract summary: This paper places contextual integrity in a strict game theoretic framework. It allows analyzing privacy norms in terms of their impact on the interaction of those agents with one another. In addition to describing games which capture paradigmatic informational norms, the paper also analyzes cases in which the game, per se, does not encourage normative behavior.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The contextual integrity model is a widely accepted way of analyzing the plurality of norms that are colloquially called "privacy norms". Contextual integrity systematically describes such norms by distinguishing the type of data concerned, the three social agents involved (subject, sender, and recipient) and the transmission principle governing the transfer of information. It allows analyzing privacy norms in terms of their impact on the interaction of those agents with one another. This paper places contextual integrity in a strict game theoretic framework. When such description is possible it has three key advantages: Firstly, it allows indisputable utilitarian justification of some privacy norms. Secondly, it better relates privacy to topics which are well understood by stakeholders whose education is predominantly quantitative, such as engineers and economists. Thirdly, it is an absolute necessity when describing ethical constraints to machines such as AI agents. In addition to describing games which capture paradigmatic informational norms, the paper also analyzes cases in which the game, per se, does not encourage normative behavior. The paper discusses two main forms of mechanisms which can be applied to the game in such cases, and shows that they reflect accepted privacy regulation and technologies.

Related papers

• Differential Privacy Overview and Fundamental Techniques [63.0409690498569]
  This chapter is meant to be part of the book "Differential Privacy in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice" It starts by illustrating various attempts to protect data privacy, emphasizing where and why they failed. It then defines the key actors, tasks, and scopes that make up the domain of privacy-preserving data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T13:52:11Z)
• Smoke Screens and Scapegoats: The Reality of General Data Protection Regulation Compliance -- Privacy and Ethics in the Case of Replika AI [1.325665193924634]
  This paper takes a critical approach towards examining the intricacies of these issues within AI companion services. We analyze articles from public media about the company and its practices to gain insight into the trustworthiness of information provided in the policy. The results reveal despite privacy notices, data collection practices might harvest personal data without users' full awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T07:36:19Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories. We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds. State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review [0.0]
  We conduct a scoping review on the ethics of generative artificial intelligence, including especially large language models and text-to-image models. Our analysis provides a taxonomy of 378 normative issues in 19 topic areas and ranks them according to their prevalence in the literature. The study offers a comprehensive overview for scholars, practitioners, or policymakers, condensing the ethical debates surrounding fairness, safety, harmful content, hallucinations, privacy, interaction risks, security, alignment, societal impacts, and others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T09:38:17Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• Navigating Surveillance Capitalism: A Critical Analysis through philosophical perspectives in Computer Ethics [0.0]
  Surveillance capitalism is the practice of collecting and analyzing massive amounts of user data. Tech companies like Google and Facebook use users' personal information to deliver personalized content and advertisements. Another example of surveillance capitalism is the use of military technology to collect and analyze data for national security purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T18:37:56Z)
• Exosoul: ethical profiling in the digital world [3.6245424131171813]
  The project Exosoul aims at developing a personalized software exoskeleton which mediates actions in the digital world according to the moral preferences of the user. The approach is hybrid, first based on the identification of profiles in a top-down manner, and then on the refinement of profiles by a personalized data-driven approach. We consider the correlations between ethics positions (idealism and relativism) personality traits (honesty/humility, conscientiousness, Machiavellianism and narcissism) and worldview (normativism)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T10:54:00Z)
• Delphi: Towards Machine Ethics and Norms [38.8316885346292]
  We identify four underlying challenges towards machine ethics and norms. Our prototype model, Delphi, demonstrates strong promise of language-based commonsense moral reasoning. We present Commonsense Norm Bank, a moral textbook customized for machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T17:38:12Z)
• Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life Anecdotes [72.64975113835018]
  Motivated by descriptive ethics, we investigate a novel, data-driven approach to machine ethics. We introduce Scruples, the first large-scale dataset with 625,000 ethical judgments over 32,000 real-life anecdotes. Our dataset presents a major challenge to state-of-the-art neural language models, leaving significant room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:34:15Z)
• A Philosophy of Data [91.3755431537592]
  We work from the fundamental properties necessary for statistical computation to a definition of statistical data. We argue that the need for useful data to be commensurable rules out an understanding of properties as fundamentally unique or equal. With our increasing reliance on data and data technologies, these two characteristics of data affect our collective conception of reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T14:47:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.