Contextual Integrity Games
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09130v1
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 06:46:53 GMT
- Title: Contextual Integrity Games
- Authors: Ran Wolff,
- Abstract summary: This paper places contextual integrity in a strict game theoretic framework.
It allows analyzing privacy norms in terms of their impact on the interaction of those agents with one another.
In addition to describing games which capture paradigmatic informational norms, the paper also analyzes cases in which the game, per se, does not encourage normative behavior.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The contextual integrity model is a widely accepted way of analyzing the plurality of norms that are colloquially called "privacy norms". Contextual integrity systematically describes such norms by distinguishing the type of data concerned, the three social agents involved (subject, sender, and recipient) and the transmission principle governing the transfer of information. It allows analyzing privacy norms in terms of their impact on the interaction of those agents with one another. This paper places contextual integrity in a strict game theoretic framework. When such description is possible it has three key advantages: Firstly, it allows indisputable utilitarian justification of some privacy norms. Secondly, it better relates privacy to topics which are well understood by stakeholders whose education is predominantly quantitative, such as engineers and economists. Thirdly, it is an absolute necessity when describing ethical constraints to machines such as AI agents. In addition to describing games which capture paradigmatic informational norms, the paper also analyzes cases in which the game, per se, does not encourage normative behavior. The paper discusses two main forms of mechanisms which can be applied to the game in such cases, and shows that they reflect accepted privacy regulation and technologies.
Related papers
- Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review [0.0]
We conduct a scoping review on the ethics of generative artificial intelligence, including especially large language models and text-to-image models.
Our analysis provides a taxonomy of 378 normative issues in 19 topic areas and ranks them according to their prevalence in the literature.
The study offers a comprehensive overview for scholars, practitioners, or policymakers, condensing the ethical debates surrounding fairness, safety, harmful content, hallucinations, privacy, interaction risks, security, alignment, societal impacts, and others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T09:38:17Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively.
Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z) - Navigating Surveillance Capitalism: A Critical Analysis through
philosophical perspectives in Computer Ethics [0.0]
Surveillance capitalism is the practice of collecting and analyzing massive amounts of user data.
Tech companies like Google and Facebook use users' personal information to deliver personalized content and advertisements.
Another example of surveillance capitalism is the use of military technology to collect and analyze data for national security purposes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-05T18:37:56Z) - Transparency, Compliance, And Contestability When Code Is(n't) Law [91.85674537754346]
Both technical security mechanisms and legal processes serve as mechanisms to deal with misbehaviour according to a set of norms.
While they share general similarities, there are also clear differences in how they are defined, act, and the effect they have on subjects.
This paper considers the similarities and differences between both types of mechanisms as ways of dealing with misbehaviour.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-08T18:03:07Z) - Exosoul: ethical profiling in the digital world [3.6245424131171813]
The project Exosoul aims at developing a personalized software exoskeleton which mediates actions in the digital world according to the moral preferences of the user.
The approach is hybrid, first based on the identification of profiles in a top-down manner, and then on the refinement of profiles by a personalized data-driven approach.
We consider the correlations between ethics positions (idealism and relativism) personality traits (honesty/humility, conscientiousness, Machiavellianism and narcissism) and worldview (normativism)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T10:54:00Z) - A Principles-based Ethics Assurance Argument Pattern for AI and
Autonomous Systems [5.45210704757922]
An emerging proposition within the trustworthy AI and autonomous systems (AI/AS) research community is to use assurance cases to instil justified confidence.
This paper substantially develops the proposition and makes it concrete.
It brings together the assurance case methodology with a set of ethical principles to structure a principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-29T09:08:03Z) - Delphi: Towards Machine Ethics and Norms [38.8316885346292]
We identify four underlying challenges towards machine ethics and norms.
Our prototype model, Delphi, demonstrates strong promise of language-based commonsense moral reasoning.
We present Commonsense Norm Bank, a moral textbook customized for machines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T17:38:12Z) - Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life
Anecdotes [72.64975113835018]
Motivated by descriptive ethics, we investigate a novel, data-driven approach to machine ethics.
We introduce Scruples, the first large-scale dataset with 625,000 ethical judgments over 32,000 real-life anecdotes.
Our dataset presents a major challenge to state-of-the-art neural language models, leaving significant room for improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-20T17:34:15Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - A Philosophy of Data [91.3755431537592]
We work from the fundamental properties necessary for statistical computation to a definition of statistical data.
We argue that the need for useful data to be commensurable rules out an understanding of properties as fundamentally unique or equal.
With our increasing reliance on data and data technologies, these two characteristics of data affect our collective conception of reality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T14:47:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.