Simulating Policy Impacts: Developing a Generative Scenario Writing Method to Evaluate the Perceived Effects of Regulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09679v1
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 19:44:54 GMT
- Title: Simulating Policy Impacts: Developing a Generative Scenario Writing Method to Evaluate the Perceived Effects of Regulation
- Authors: Julia Barnett, Kimon Kieslich, Nicholas Diakopoulos,
- Abstract summary: We use GPT-4 to generate scenarios both pre- and post-introduction of policy.
We then run a user study to evaluate these scenarios across four risk-assessment dimensions.
We find that this transparency legislation is perceived to be effective at mitigating harms in areas such as labor and well-being, but largely ineffective in areas such as social cohesion and security.
- Score: 3.2566808526538873
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid advancement of AI technologies yields numerous future impacts on individuals and society. Policy-makers are therefore tasked to react quickly and establish policies that mitigate those impacts. However, anticipating the effectiveness of policies is a difficult task, as some impacts might only be observable in the future and respective policies might not be applicable to the future development of AI. In this work we develop a method for using large language models (LLMs) to evaluate the efficacy of a given piece of policy at mitigating specified negative impacts. We do so by using GPT-4 to generate scenarios both pre- and post-introduction of policy and translating these vivid stories into metrics based on human perceptions of impacts. We leverage an already established taxonomy of impacts of generative AI in the media environment to generate a set of scenario pairs both mitigated and non-mitigated by the transparency legislation of Article 50 of the EU AI Act. We then run a user study (n=234) to evaluate these scenarios across four risk-assessment dimensions: severity, plausibility, magnitude, and specificity to vulnerable populations. We find that this transparency legislation is perceived to be effective at mitigating harms in areas such as labor and well-being, but largely ineffective in areas such as social cohesion and security. Through this case study on generative AI harms we demonstrate the efficacy of our method as a tool to iterate on the effectiveness of policy on mitigating various negative impacts. We expect this method to be useful to researchers or other stakeholders who want to brainstorm the potential utility of different pieces of policy or other mitigation strategies.
Related papers
- Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori.
In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty.
We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z) - Game and Reference: Policy Combination Synthesis for Epidemic Prevention and Control [4.635793210136456]
We present a novel Policy Combination Synthesis (PCS) model for epidemic policy-making.
To prevent extreme decisions, we introduce adversarial learning between the model-made policies and the real policies.
We also employ contrastive learning to let the model draw on experience from the best historical policies under similar scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-16T00:26:59Z) - Anticipating Impacts: Using Large-Scale Scenario Writing to Explore
Diverse Implications of Generative AI in the News Environment [3.660182910533372]
We aim to broaden the perspective and capture the expectations of three stakeholder groups about the potential negative impacts of generative AI.
We apply scenario writing and use participatory foresight to delve into cognitively diverse imaginations of the future.
We conclude by discussing the usefulness of scenario-writing and participatory foresight as a toolbox for generative AI impact assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T06:59:27Z) - Conformal Off-Policy Evaluation in Markov Decision Processes [53.786439742572995]
Reinforcement Learning aims at identifying and evaluating efficient control policies from data.
Most methods for this learning task, referred to as Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE), do not come with accuracy and certainty guarantees.
We present a novel OPE method based on Conformal Prediction that outputs an interval containing the true reward of the target policy with a prescribed level of certainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T16:45:11Z) - Policy Dispersion in Non-Markovian Environment [53.05904889617441]
This paper tries to learn the diverse policies from the history of state-action pairs under a non-Markovian environment.
We first adopt a transformer-based method to learn policy embeddings.
Then, we stack the policy embeddings to construct a dispersion matrix to induce a set of diverse policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T11:58:39Z) - Blessing from Human-AI Interaction: Super Reinforcement Learning in
Confounded Environments [19.944163846660498]
We introduce the paradigm of super reinforcement learning that takes advantage of Human-AI interaction for data driven sequential decision making.
In the decision process with unmeasured confounding, the actions taken by past agents can offer valuable insights into undisclosed information.
We develop several super-policy learning algorithms and systematically study their theoretical properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-29T16:03:07Z) - Crowdsourcing Impacts: Exploring the Utility of Crowds for Anticipating
Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision Making [7.068913546756094]
We employ crowdsourcing to uncover different types of impact areas based on a set of governmental algorithmic decision making tools.
Our findings suggest that this method is effective at leveraging the cognitive diversity of the crowd to uncover a range of issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T19:46:53Z) - Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy
Design using the AI Economist [67.08543240320756]
We show that the AI Economist framework enables effective, flexible, and interpretable policy design using two-level reinforcement learning and data-driven simulations.
We find that log-linear policies trained using RL significantly improve social welfare, based on both public health and economic outcomes, compared to past outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T01:30:41Z) - Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and
Deployment [71.9309995623067]
NeurIPS 2020 requested that research paper submissions include impact statements on "potential nefarious uses and the consequences of failure"
We argue that frameworks of harms must be context-aware and consider a wider range of potential stakeholders, system affordances, as well as viable proxies for assessing harms in the widest sense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-26T18:09:52Z) - Efficient Evaluation of Natural Stochastic Policies in Offline
Reinforcement Learning [80.42316902296832]
We study the efficient off-policy evaluation of natural policies, which are defined in terms of deviations from the behavior policy.
This is a departure from the literature on off-policy evaluation where most work consider the evaluation of explicitly specified policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-06T15:08:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.