Co-Matching: Towards Human-Machine Collaborative Legal Case Matching

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10248v1
• Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 16:50:31 GMT
• Title: Co-Matching: Towards Human-Machine Collaborative Legal Case Matching
• Authors: Chen Huang, Xinwei Yang, Yang Deng, Wenqiang Lei, JianCheng Lv, Tat-Seng Chua,
• Abstract summary: Successful legal case matching requires tacit knowledge of legal practitioners, which is difficult to verbalize and encode into machines. We propose a collaborative matching framework called Co-Matching, which encourages both the machine and the legal practitioner to participate in the matching process. Our study represents a pioneering effort in human-machine collaboration for the matching task, marking a milestone for future collaborative matching studies.
• Score: 69.21196368715144
• License:
• Abstract: Recent efforts have aimed to improve AI machines in legal case matching by integrating legal domain knowledge. However, successful legal case matching requires the tacit knowledge of legal practitioners, which is difficult to verbalize and encode into machines. This emphasizes the crucial role of involving legal practitioners in high-stakes legal case matching. To address this, we propose a collaborative matching framework called Co-Matching, which encourages both the machine and the legal practitioner to participate in the matching process, integrating tacit knowledge. Unlike existing methods that rely solely on the machine, Co-Matching allows both the legal practitioner and the machine to determine key sentences and then combine them probabilistically. Co-Matching introduces a method called ProtoEM to estimate human decision uncertainty, facilitating the probabilistic combination. Experimental results demonstrate that Co-Matching consistently outperforms existing legal case matching methods, delivering significant performance improvements over human- and machine-based matching in isolation (on average, +5.51% and +8.71%, respectively). Further analysis shows that Co-Matching also ensures better human-machine collaboration effectiveness. Our study represents a pioneering effort in human-machine collaboration for the matching task, marking a milestone for future collaborative matching studies.

Related papers

• Similar Phrases for Cause of Actions of Civil Cases [0.5949789346585451]
  The study implements various similarity measures, including Dice coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient. An ensemble model combines rankings, and social network analysis identifies clusters of related COAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T06:43:45Z)
• SparseCL: Sparse Contrastive Learning for Contradiction Retrieval [87.02936971689817]
  Contradiction retrieval refers to identifying and extracting documents that explicitly disagree with or refute the content of a query. Existing methods such as similarity search and crossencoder models exhibit significant limitations. We introduce SparseCL that leverages specially trained sentence embeddings designed to preserve subtle, contradictory nuances between sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T21:57:03Z)
• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• Tackling Cooperative Incompatibility for Zero-Shot Human-AI Coordination [36.33334853998621]
  We introduce the Cooperative Open-ended LEarning (COLE) framework to solve cooperative incompatibility in learning. COLE formulates open-ended objectives in cooperative games with two players using perspectives of graph theory to evaluate and pinpoint the cooperative capacity of each strategy. We show that COLE could effectively overcome the cooperative incompatibility from theoretical and empirical analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T16:51:38Z)
• Beyond Incompatibility: Trade-offs between Mutually Exclusive Fairness Criteria in Machine Learning and Law [2.959308758321417]
  We present a novel algorithm (FAir Interpolation Method: FAIM) for continuously interpolating between three fairness criteria. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm when applied to synthetic data, the COMPAS data set, and a new, real-world data set from the e-commerce sector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T12:47:54Z)
• Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks [67.29240500171532]
  Benchopt is a framework to automate, reproduce and publish optimization benchmarks in machine learning. Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T16:19:24Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• Normative Disagreement as a Challenge for Cooperative AI [56.34005280792013]
  We argue that typical cooperation-inducing learning algorithms fail to cooperate in bargaining problems. We develop a class of norm-adaptive policies and show in experiments that these significantly increase cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T11:37:42Z)
• Partner-Aware Algorithms in Decentralized Cooperative Bandit Teams [14.215359943041369]
  We propose and analyze a decentralized Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem with coupled rewards as an abstraction of more general multi-agent collaboration. We propose a Partner-Aware strategy for joint sequential decision-making that extends the well-known single-agent Upper Confidence Bound algorithm. Our results show that the proposed partner-aware strategy outperforms other known methods, and our human subject studies suggest humans prefer to collaborate with AI agents implementing our partner-aware strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T08:17:30Z)
• Balancing Rational and Other-Regarding Preferences in Cooperative-Competitive Environments [4.705291741591329]
  Mixed environments are notorious for the conflicts of selfish and social interests. We propose BAROCCO to balance individual and social incentives. Our meta-algorithm is compatible with both Q-learning and Actor-Critic frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T14:35:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.