A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10579v1
• Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 07:08:13 GMT
• Title: A Hard Nut to Crack: Idiom Detection with Conversational Large Language Models
• Authors: Francesca De Luca Fornaciari, Begoña Altuna, Itziar Gonzalez-Dios, Maite Melero,
• Abstract summary: We introduce theatic language Test Suite IdioTS, a new dataset designed by language experts to assess the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process figurative language at sentence level. We propose a comprehensive evaluation methodology based on an idiom detection task, where LLMs are prompted with detecting an idiomatic expression in a given English sentence. We present a thorough automatic and manual evaluation of the results and an extensive error analysis.
• Score: 2.02990044704201
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we explore idiomatic language processing with Large Language Models (LLMs). We introduce the Idiomatic language Test Suite IdioTS, a new dataset of difficult examples specifically designed by language experts to assess the capabilities of LLMs to process figurative language at sentence level. We propose a comprehensive evaluation methodology based on an idiom detection task, where LLMs are prompted with detecting an idiomatic expression in a given English sentence. We present a thorough automatic and manual evaluation of the results and an extensive error analysis.

Related papers

• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts. We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion. We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Establishing Vocabulary Tests as a Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models [2.7013338932521416]
  We advocate for the revival of vocabulary tests as a valuable tool for assessing Large Language Models (LLMs) performance. We evaluate seven LLMs using two vocabulary test formats across two languages and uncover surprising gaps in their lexical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T08:45:12Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-training [57.18058739931463]
  We propose XLM-P, which contextually retrieves prompts as flexible guidance for encoding instances conditionally. Our XLM-P enables (1) lightweight modeling of language-invariant and language-specific knowledge across languages, and (2) easy integration with other multilingual pre-training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:08:08Z)
• Interpretable Unified Language Checking [42.816372695828306]
  We present an interpretable, unified, language checking (UniLC) method for both human and machine-generated language. We find that LLMs can achieve high performance on a combination of fact-checking, stereotype detection, and hate speech detection tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T16:47:49Z)
• Modeling Sequential Sentence Relation to Improve Cross-lingual Dense Retrieval [87.11836738011007]
  We propose a multilingual multilingual language model called masked sentence model (MSM) MSM consists of a sentence encoder to generate the sentence representations, and a document encoder applied to a sequence of sentence vectors from a document. To train the model, we propose a masked sentence prediction task, which masks and predicts the sentence vector via a hierarchical contrastive loss with sampled negatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T09:54:27Z)
• Prompting Language Models for Linguistic Structure [73.11488464916668]
  We present a structured prompting approach for linguistic structured prediction tasks. We evaluate this approach on part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and sentence chunking. We find that while PLMs contain significant prior knowledge of task labels due to task leakage into the pretraining corpus, structured prompting can also retrieve linguistic structure with arbitrary labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T01:13:39Z)
• LMentry: A Language Model Benchmark of Elementary Language Tasks [39.71352171304755]
  LMentry is a benchmark that focuses on a compact set of tasks that are trivial to humans. It provides insights into the capabilities and robustness of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T18:01:12Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.