Amplifying Academic Research through YouTube: Engagement Metrics as Predictors of Citation Impact

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12734v1
• Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:43:37 GMT
• Title: Amplifying Academic Research through YouTube: Engagement Metrics as Predictors of Citation Impact
• Authors: Olga Zagovora, Talisa Schwal, Katrin Weller,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the interplay between YouTube engagement metrics and the academic impact of cited publications within video descriptions. By analyzing data from Altmetric.com and YouTube's API, it assesses how YouTube video features relate to citation impact.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the interplay between YouTube engagement metrics and the academic impact of cited publications within video descriptions, amid declining trust in traditional journalism and increased reliance on social media for information. By analyzing data from Altmetric.com and YouTube's API, it assesses how YouTube video features relate to citation impact. Initial results suggest that videos citing scientific publications and garnering high engagement-likes, comments, and references to other publications-may function as a filtering mechanism or even as a predictor of impactful research.

Related papers

• Scientific discourse on YouTube: Motivations for citing research in comments [0.3277163122167434]
  This study will provide insights on why individuals post links to research publications in comments. We discovered that the primary motives for sharing research links were (1) providing more insights into the topic and (2) challenging information offered by other commentators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T13:50:02Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• CausalCite: A Causal Formulation of Paper Citations [80.82622421055734]
  CausalCite is a new way to measure the significance of a paper by assessing the causal impact of the paper on its follow-up papers. It is based on a novel causal inference method, TextMatch, which adapts the traditional matching framework to high-dimensional text embeddings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalCite on various criteria, such as high correlation with paper impact as reported by scientific experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T23:09:39Z)
• Towards Debiasing Frame Length Bias in Text-Video Retrieval via Causal Intervention [72.12974259966592]
  We present a unique and systematic study of a temporal bias due to frame length discrepancy between training and test sets of trimmed video clips. We propose a causal debiasing approach and perform extensive experiments and ablation studies on the Epic-Kitchens-100, YouCook2, and MSR-VTT datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T15:58:27Z)
• Artificial intelligence technologies to support research assessment: A review [10.203602318836444]
  This literature review identifies indicators that associate with higher impact or higher quality research from article text. It includes studies that used machine learning techniques to predict citation counts or quality scores for journal articles or conference papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:58:39Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Citation Trajectory Prediction via Publication Influence Representation Using Temporal Knowledge Graph [52.07771598974385]
  Existing approaches mainly rely on mining temporal and graph data from academic articles. Our framework is composed of three modules: difference-preserved graph embedding, fine-grained influence representation, and learning-based trajectory calculation. Experiments are conducted on both the APS academic dataset and our contributed AIPatent dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T07:43:26Z)
• YouTube and Science: Models for Research Impact [1.237556184089774]
  We created new datasets using YouTube videos and mentions of research articles on various online platforms. We analyzed these datasets through statistical techniques and visualization, and built machine learning models to predict whether a research article is cited in videos. According to our results, research articles mentioned in more tweets and news coverage have a higher chance of receiving video citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-01T19:25:38Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• A Decade of In-text Citation Analysis based on Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Techniques: An overview of empirical studies [3.474275085556876]
  Information scientists have gone far beyond traditional bibliometrics by tapping into advancements in full-text data processing techniques. This article aims to narratively review the studies on these developments. Its primary focus is on publications that have used natural language processing and machine learning techniques to analyse citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-29T17:27:08Z)
• How do academic topics shift across altmetric sources? A case study of the research area of Big Data [2.208242292882514]
  Author keywords from publications and terms from online events are extracted as the main topics of the publications and the online discussion of their audiences at Altmetric. Results show there are substantial differences between the two sets of topics around Big Data scientific research. Blogs and News show a strong similarity in the terms commonly used, while Policy documents and Wikipedia articles exhibit the strongest dissimilarity in considering and interpreting Big Data related research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T19:37:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.