Annotation-Efficient Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13541v1
• Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 11:23:03 GMT
• Title: Annotation-Efficient Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
• Authors: Yuu Jinnai, Ukyo Honda,
• Abstract summary: We show how to use the limited annotation budget to create an effective preference dataset. We evaluate the performance of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) using AEPO and show that it outperforms models trained using a standard DPO with the same annotation budget.
• Score: 3.726173629675064
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Preference optimization is a standard approach to fine-tuning large language models to align with human preferences. The quality, diversity, and quantity of the preference dataset are critical to the effectiveness of preference optimization. However, obtaining a large amount of high-quality and diverse preference annotations is difficult in many applications. This raises the question of how to use the limited annotation budget to create an effective preference dataset. To this end, we propose Annotation-Efficient Preference Optimization (AEPO). Instead of exhaustively annotating preference over all available response texts, AEPO selects a subset of responses that maximizes quality and diversity from the available responses, and then annotates preference over the selected ones. In this way, AEPO focuses the annotation budget on labeling preference over a smaller subset of responses with diversity and of high quality. We evaluate the performance of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) using AEPO and show that it outperforms models trained using a standard DPO with the same annotation budget. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/annotation-efficient-po

Related papers

• VPO: Leveraging the Number of Votes in Preference Optimization [5.200545764106177]
  We introduce a technique that leverages user voting data to better align with diverse subjective preferences. We develop the Vote-based Preference Optimization framework, which incorporates the number of votes on both sides to distinguish between controversial and obvious generation pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T10:39:34Z)
• TPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Multi-branch & Multi-step Preference Trees [14.84379332031731]
  We introduce Tree Preference Optimization (TPO), that does not sample paired preference responses from the preference tree. TPO formulates the language model alignment as a Preference List Ranking problem, where the policy can learn more effectively from a ranked preference list of responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T22:22:05Z)
• mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models [52.607764280030196]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) has shown to be an effective method for large language model (LLM) alignment. Recent works have attempted to apply DPO to multimodal scenarios but have found it challenging to achieve consistent improvement. We propose mDPO, a multimodal DPO objective that prevents the over-prioritization of language-only preferences by also optimizing image preference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T17:59:58Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Self-generated Preference Data [72.99676237703099]
  We propose a new framework that boosts the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Our key idea is leveraging the human prior knowledge within the small (seed) data. We introduce a noise-aware preference learning algorithm to mitigate the risk of low quality within generated preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T18:01:02Z)
• Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback [103.36048042664768]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a prevalent approach to align AI systems with human values. We propose a novel adaptive preference loss, underpinned by distributionally robust optimization (DRO) Our method is versatile and can be readily adapted to various preference optimization frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T20:33:22Z)
• Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives [0.5120567378386615]
  We propose a hybrid approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T08:35:48Z)
• Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization [105.3612692153615]
  A common technique for aligning large language models (LLMs) relies on acquiring human preferences. We propose a new axis that is based on eliciting preferences jointly over the instruction-response pairs. We find that joint preferences over instruction and response pairs can significantly enhance the alignment of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T02:05:40Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset [58.7977683502207]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) is a successful strategy for aligning large language models with human preferences. We propose a generalization of DPO, termed DPO with an offset (ODPO), that does not treat every preference pair equally during fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T10:55:38Z)
• Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts [95.09994361995389]
  Relative Preference Optimization (RPO) is designed to discern between more and less preferred responses derived from both identical and related prompts. RPO has demonstrated a superior ability to align large language models with user preferences and to improve their adaptability during the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T22:47:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.