Large language models can be zero-shot anomaly detectors for time series?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14755v1
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:21:57 GMT
• Title: Large language models can be zero-shot anomaly detectors for time series?
• Authors: Sarah Alnegheimish, Linh Nguyen, Laure Berti-Equille, Kalyan Veeramachaneni,
• Abstract summary: sigllm is a framework for time series anomaly detection using large language models. We present a prompt-based detection method that directly asks a language model to indicate which elements of the input are anomalies. We show that the forecasting method significantly outperformed the prompting method in all 11 datasets with respect to the F1 score.
• Score: 9.249657468385779
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies have shown the ability of large language models to perform a variety of tasks, including time series forecasting. The flexible nature of these models allows them to be used for many applications. In this paper, we present a novel study of large language models used for the challenging task of time series anomaly detection. This problem entails two aspects novel for LLMs: the need for the model to identify part of the input sequence (or multiple parts) as anomalous; and the need for it to work with time series data rather than the traditional text input. We introduce sigllm, a framework for time series anomaly detection using large language models. Our framework includes a time-series-to-text conversion module, as well as end-to-end pipelines that prompt language models to perform time series anomaly detection. We investigate two paradigms for testing the abilities of large language models to perform the detection task. First, we present a prompt-based detection method that directly asks a language model to indicate which elements of the input are anomalies. Second, we leverage the forecasting capability of a large language model to guide the anomaly detection process. We evaluated our framework on 11 datasets spanning various sources and 10 pipelines. We show that the forecasting method significantly outperformed the prompting method in all 11 datasets with respect to the F1 score. Moreover, while large language models are capable of finding anomalies, state-of-the-art deep learning models are still superior in performance, achieving results 30% better than large language models.

Related papers

• Language Models Still Struggle to Zero-shot Reason about Time Series [11.764833497297493]
  Time series are critical for decision-making in fields like finance and healthcare. It remains unknown whether non-trivial forecasting implies that language models can reason about time series. We generate a first-of-its-kind evaluation framework for time series reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T21:27:33Z)
• Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models [110.20279343734548]
  Time series forecasting holds significant importance in many real-world dynamic systems. We present Time-LLM, a reprogramming framework to repurpose large language models for time series forecasting. Time-LLM is a powerful time series learner that outperforms state-of-the-art, specialized forecasting models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T01:31:25Z)
• An Open Dataset and Model for Language Identification [84.15194457400253]
  We present a LID model which achieves a macro-average F1 score of 0.93 and a false positive rate of 0.033 across 201 languages. We make both the model and the dataset available to the research community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T08:43:42Z)
• A Generative Language Model for Few-shot Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [90.24921443175514]
  We focus on aspect-based sentiment analysis, which involves extracting aspect term, category, and predicting their corresponding polarities. We propose to reformulate the extraction and prediction tasks into the sequence generation task, using a generative language model with unidirectional attention. Our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art (based on BERT) on average performance by a large margins in few-shot and full-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T18:31:53Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
• Multi-timescale Representation Learning in LSTM Language Models [69.98840820213937]
  Language models must capture statistical dependencies between words at timescales ranging from very short to very long. We derived a theory for how the memory gating mechanism in long short-term memory language models can capture power law decay. Experiments showed that LSTM language models trained on natural English text learn to approximate this theoretical distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T02:13:38Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.