Agile Culture Clash: Unveiling Challenges in Cultivating an Agile Mindset in Organizations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15066v1
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 21:33:38 GMT
• Title: Agile Culture Clash: Unveiling Challenges in Cultivating an Agile Mindset in Organizations
• Abstract summary: In agile transformations, there are many challenges such as alignment between agile practices and the organizational goals and strategies. One very important challenge but less considered and treated in research are cultural challenges associated with an agile mindset. We identify challenges that arise from the interplay between agile culture and organizational culture.
• Score: 2.0179426711855295
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: In agile transformations, there are many challenges such as alignment between agile practices and the organizational goals and strategies or issues with shifts in how work is organized and executed. One very important challenge but less considered and treated in research are cultural challenges associated with an agile mindset. Although research shows that cultural clashes and general organizational resistance to change are part of the most significant agile adoption barriers. Objective: We identify challenges that arise from the interplay between agile culture and organizational culture. In doing so, we tackle this field and come up with important contributions for further research regarding a problem that practitioners face today. Method: This is done with a mixed-method research approach. First, we gathered qualitative data among our network of agile practitioners and derived in sum 15 challenges with agile culture. Then, we conducted quantitative data by means of a questionnaire study with 92 participants. Results: We identified 7 key challenges out of the 15 challenges with agile culture. These key challenges refer to the technical agility (doing agile) and the cultural agility (being agile). The results are presented in type of a conceptual model named the Agile Cultural Challenges (ACuCa). Conclusion: Based on our results, we started deriving future work aspects to do more detailed research on the topic of cultural challenges while transitioning or using agile methods in software development and beyond.

Related papers

• Overcoming Challenges in Agile and DevOps Integration: A Qualitative Study [4.908297240926983]
  The study identifies four core categories of integration challenges: Cultural & Organizational Barriers, Structural Constraints, Process & Method Complexity, and Technical Limitations.<n>It offers four major solution domains: Team Structure & Autonomy, Culture & Collaboration, Process & Change Management, and Automation & Infrastructure.<n>The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the Agile-DevOps interface and offer practical insights for software organizations seeking to navigate this complex transition effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T04:34:26Z)
• Mind the Gap in Cultural Alignment: Task-Aware Culture Management for Large Language Models [78.19037585302475]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in culturally sensitive real-world tasks.<n>Existing cultural alignment approaches fail to align LLMs' broad cultural values with the specific goals of downstream tasks.<n>We propose CultureManager, a novel pipeline for task-specific cultural alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T23:27:18Z)
• Why Do We Code? A Theory on Motivations and Challenges in Software Engineering from Education to Practice [6.2843244159918505]
  Motivations and challenges jointly shape how individuals enter, persist, and evolve within software engineering (SE)<n>Our findings show how unmet motivations and recurring challenges influence persistence, career shifts, or departure from the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T17:54:36Z)
• AI and Agile Software Development: From Frustration to Success -- XP2025 Workshop Summary [2.856781525749652]
  The workshop culminated in a research roadmap that pinpoints actionable directions for future work.<n>The key outcome is a structured agenda designed to foster joint industry-academic efforts to move from identified frustrations to successful implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T06:29:03Z)
• From Surveys to Narratives: Rethinking Cultural Value Adaptation in LLMs [57.43233760384488]
  Adapting cultural values in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents significant challenges.<n>Prior work primarily aligns LLMs with different cultural values using World Values Survey (WVS) data.<n>In this paper, we investigate WVS-based training for cultural value adaptation and find that relying solely on survey data cane cultural norms and interfere with factual knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:00:01Z)
• CAReDiO: Cultural Alignment of LLM via Representativeness and Distinctiveness Guided Data Optimization [50.90288681622152]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) more deeply integrate into human life across various regions. Existing approaches develop culturally aligned LLMs through fine-tuning with culture-specific corpora. We introduce CAReDiO, a novel cultural data construction framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T13:40:13Z)
• Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability [61.44773053835185]
  Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities. Despite recent progress toward these goals, there are many open problems in the field that require solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:57:18Z)
• OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI [73.75520820608232]
  We introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities. These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage. Our evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97% overall accuracy, illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T16:20:53Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• Defining Requirements Strategies in Agile: A Design Science Research Study [4.110602799032192]
  Research shows that many of the challenges currently encountered with agile development are related to requirements engineering. This paper investigates critical challenges that arise in agile development from an undefined requirements strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T07:57:32Z)
• Towards A Double-Edged Sword: Modelling the Impact in Agile Software Development [2.477589198476322]
  We combine two causal models presented in literature: The Agile Practices Impact Model and the Model of Cultural Impact. This papers core contribution is the Agile Influence and Imact Model, describing the factors influencing agile elements and the impact on specific characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T21:48:45Z)
• What You Use is What You Get: Unforced Errors in Studying Cultural Aspects in Agile Software Development [2.9418191027447906]
  Investigating the influence of cultural characteristics is challenging due to the multi-faceted concept of culture. Cultural and social aspects are of high importance for their successful use in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T20:08:37Z)
• Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models [171.01569693871676]
  This work identifies 18 foundational challenges in assuring the alignment and safety of large language models (LLMs) Based on the identified challenges, we pose $200+$ concrete research questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T16:58:28Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
• Navigating Cultural Diversity: Barriers and Potentials in Multicultural Agile Software Development Teams [2.2044574002571182]
  The aim of this study is to identify barriers and potentials that may arise in multicultural agile software development teams. Our results suggest that the cultural characteristics at the team level need to be analyzed individually in intercultural teams. Third, we derived strategies supporting the potentials of cultural diversity in agile software development teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T19:27:48Z)
• POQue: Asking Participant-specific Outcome Questions for a Deeper Understanding of Complex Events [26.59626509200256]
  We show that crowd workers are able to infer the collective impact of salient events that make up the situation. By creating a multi-step interface, we collect a high quality annotated dataset of 8K short newswire narratives and ROCStories. Our dataset, POQue, enables the exploration and development of models that address multiple aspects of semantic understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T22:23:27Z)
• IGLU 2022: Interactive Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment at NeurIPS 2022 [63.07251290802841]
  We propose IGLU: Interactive Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment. The primary goal of the competition is to approach the problem of how to develop interactive embodied agents. This research challenge is naturally related, but not limited, to two fields of study that are highly relevant to the NeurIPS community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T06:12:48Z)
• NeurIPS 2021 Competition IGLU: Interactive Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment [71.11505407453072]
  We propose IGLU: Interactive Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment. The primary goal of the competition is to approach the problem of how to build interactive agents that learn to solve a task while provided with grounded natural language instructions in a collaborative environment. This research challenge is naturally related, but not limited, to two fields of study that are highly relevant to the NeurIPS community: Natural Language Understanding and Generation (NLU/G) and Reinforcement Learning (RL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T07:13:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.