Rényi Neural Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15991v2
• Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 09:33:43 GMT
• Title: Rényi Neural Processes
• Authors: Xuesong Wang, He Zhao, Edwin V. Bonilla,
• Abstract summary: We propose R'enyi Neural Processes (RNP) to ameliorate the impacts of prior misspecification. We scale the density ratio $fracpq$ by the power of (1-$alpha$) in the divergence gradients with respect to the posterior. Our experiments show consistent log-likelihood improvements over state-of-the-art NP family models.
• Score: 14.11793373584558
• License:
• Abstract: Neural Processes (NPs) are deep probabilistic models that represent stochastic processes by conditioning their prior distributions on a set of context points. Despite their obvious advantages in uncertainty estimation for complex distributions, NPs enforce parameterization coupling between the conditional prior model and the posterior model, thereby risking introducing a misspecified prior distribution. We hereby revisit the NP objectives and propose R\'enyi Neural Processes (RNP) to ameliorate the impacts of prior misspecification by optimizing an alternative posterior that achieves better marginal likelihood. More specifically, by replacing the standard KL divergence with the R\'enyi divergence between the model posterior and the true posterior, we scale the density ratio $\frac{p}{q}$ by the power of (1-$\alpha$) in the divergence gradients with respect to the posterior. This hyper parameter $\alpha$ allows us to dampen the effects of the misspecified prior for the posterior update, which has been shown to effectively avoid oversmoothed predictions and improve the expressiveness of the posterior model. Our extensive experiments show consistent log-likelihood improvements over state-of-the-art NP family models which adopt both the variational inference or maximum likelihood estimation objectives. We validate the effectiveness of our approach across multiple benchmarks including regression and image inpainting tasks, and show significant performance improvements of RNPs in real-world regression problems where the underlying prior model is misspecifed.

Related papers

• Inference at the data's edge: Gaussian processes for modeling and inference under model-dependency, poor overlap, and extrapolation [0.0]
  The Gaussian Process (GP) is a flexible non-linear regression approach. It provides a principled approach to handling our uncertainty over predicted (counterfactual) values. This is especially valuable under conditions of extrapolation or weak overlap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T05:09:50Z)
• Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems Using Optimal Posterior Covariance [52.093434664236014]
  Recent diffusion models provide a promising zero-shot solution to noisy linear inverse problems without retraining for specific inverse problems. Inspired by this finding, we propose to improve recent methods by using more principled covariance determined by maximum likelihood estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T13:35:39Z)
• SPDE priors for uncertainty quantification of end-to-end neural data assimilation schemes [4.213142548113385]
  Recent advances in the deep learning community enables to adress this problem as neural architecture embedding data assimilation variational framework. In this work, we draw from SPDE-based Processes to estimate prior models able to handle non-stationary covariances in both space and time. Our neural variational scheme is modified to embed an augmented state formulation with both state SPDE parametrization to estimate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T19:18:12Z)
• Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization [59.758009422067]
  We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning. We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE) whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values. We introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC) that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T15:55:58Z)
• Variational Laplace Autoencoders [53.08170674326728]
  Variational autoencoders employ an amortized inference model to approximate the posterior of latent variables. We present a novel approach that addresses the limited posterior expressiveness of fully-factorized Gaussian assumption. We also present a general framework named Variational Laplace Autoencoders (VLAEs) for training deep generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T18:59:27Z)
• Improving Robustness and Uncertainty Modelling in Neural Ordinary Differential Equations [0.2538209532048866]
  We propose a novel approach to model uncertainty in NODE by considering a distribution over the end-time $T$ of the ODE solver. We also propose, adaptive latent time NODE (ALT-NODE), which allow each data point to have a distinct posterior distribution over end-times. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches in modelling uncertainty and robustness through experiments on synthetic and several real-world image classification data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-23T16:56:10Z)
• Loss function based second-order Jensen inequality and its application to particle variational inference [112.58907653042317]
  Particle variational inference (PVI) uses an ensemble of models as an empirical approximation for the posterior distribution. PVI iteratively updates each model with a repulsion force to ensure the diversity of the optimized models. We derive a novel generalization error bound and show that it can be reduced by enhancing the diversity of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T12:13:51Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Sampling-free Variational Inference for Neural Networks with Multiplicative Activation Noise [51.080620762639434]
  We propose a more efficient parameterization of the posterior approximation for sampling-free variational inference. Our approach yields competitive results for standard regression problems and scales well to large-scale image classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T16:16:18Z)
• Reducing the Amortization Gap in Variational Autoencoders: A Bayesian Random Function Approach [38.45568741734893]
  Inference in our GP model is done by a single feed forward pass through the network, significantly faster than semi-amortized methods. We show that our approach attains higher test data likelihood than the state-of-the-arts on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T13:01:12Z)
• Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural Processes [32.02612871707347]
  We propose ConvNP, which endows Neural Processes (NPs) with translation equivariance and extends convolutional conditional NPs to allow for dependencies in the predictive distribution. We demonstrate the strong performance and generalization capabilities of ConvNPs on 1D, regression image completion, and various tasks with real-world-temporal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T18:25:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.