Devil's Advocate: Anticipatory Reflection for LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16334v4
• Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:41:48 GMT
• Title: Devil's Advocate: Anticipatory Reflection for LLM Agents
• Authors: Haoyu Wang, Tao Li, Zhiwei Deng, Dan Roth, Yang Li,
• Abstract summary: Our approach prompts LLM agents to decompose a given task into manageable subtasks. We implement a three-fold introspective intervention:. Anticipatory reflection on potential failures and alternative remedy before action execution. Post-action alignment with subtask objectives and backtracking with remedy to ensure utmost effort in plan execution.
• Score: 53.897557605550325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we introduce a novel approach that equips LLM agents with introspection, enhancing consistency and adaptability in solving complex tasks. Our approach prompts LLM agents to decompose a given task into manageable subtasks (i.e., to make a plan), and to continuously introspect upon the suitability and results of their actions. %; and when necessary, to explore ``the road not taken.'' We implement a three-fold introspective intervention: 1) anticipatory reflection on potential failures and alternative remedy before action execution, 2) post-action alignment with subtask objectives and backtracking with remedy to ensure utmost effort in plan execution, and 3) comprehensive review upon plan completion for future strategy refinement. By deploying and experimenting with this methodology -- a zero-shot approach -- within WebArena for practical tasks in web environments, our agent demonstrates superior performance with a success rate of 23.5% over existing zero-shot methods by 3.5%. The experimental results suggest that our introspection-driven approach not only enhances the agent's ability to navigate unanticipated challenges through a robust mechanism of plan execution, but also improves efficiency by reducing the number of trials and plan revisions by 45% needed to achieve a task.

Related papers

• SAND: Boosting LLM Agents with Self-Taught Action Deliberation [53.732649189709285]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents are commonly tuned with supervised finetuning on ReAct-style expert trajectories or preference optimization over pairwise rollouts.<n>We propose Self-taught ActioN Deliberation (SAND) framework, enabling LLM agents to explicitly deliberate over candidate actions before committing to one.<n>SAND achieves an average 20% improvement over initial supervised finetuning and also outperforms state-of-the-art agent tuning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T05:38:15Z)
• Conditional Multi-Stage Failure Recovery for Embodied Agents [17.95974193288372]
  We introduce a conditional multistage failure recovery framework that employs zero-shot chain prompting.<n>We evaluate our method on the TfD benchmark of the TEACH dataset and achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T14:23:41Z)
• MIRROR: Multi-agent Intra- and Inter-Reflection for Optimized Reasoning in Tool Learning [33.009759731505746]
  Complex tasks involving tool integration pose significant challenges for Large Language Models.<n> Reflection has emerged as an effective strategy for correcting erroneous trajectories in agentic benchmarks.<n>We propose MIRROR, a framework that consists of both intra-reflection, which critically assesses intended actions before execution, and inter-reflection, which further adjusts the trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T03:37:33Z)
• Fast Adaptation with Behavioral Foundation Models [82.34700481726951]
  Unsupervised zero-shot reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for pretraining behavioral foundation models. Despite promising results, zero-shot policies are often suboptimal due to errors induced by the unsupervised training process. We propose fast adaptation strategies that search in the low-dimensional task-embedding space of the pre-trained BFM to rapidly improve the performance of its zero-shot policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:17Z)
• MPO: Boosting LLM Agents with Meta Plan Optimization [37.35230659116656]
  Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agents to successfully tackle interactive planning tasks. Existing approaches often suffer from planning hallucinations and require retraining for each new agent. We propose the Meta Plan Optimization framework, which enhances agent planning capabilities by directly incorporating explicit guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T14:54:45Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process. We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• ConceptAgent: LLM-Driven Precondition Grounding and Tree Search for Robust Task Planning and Execution [33.252158560173655]
  ConceptAgent is a natural language-driven robotic platform designed for task execution in unstructured environments. We present innovations designed to limit shortcomings, including 1) Predicate Grounding to prevent and recover from infeasible actions, and 2) an embodied version of LLM-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search with self reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T15:05:40Z)
• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems, leveraging a fast task decomposition and allocation process. We integrate a feedback loop into the proposed framework to further enhance the effectiveness and robustness of such a problem-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Hierarchical in-Context Reinforcement Learning and Hindsight Modular Reflections for Task Planning with LLMs [8.55917897789612]
  We propose Retrieval-Augmented in-context reinforcement Learning (RAHL) for large language models. RAHL decomposes complex tasks into sub-tasks using an LLM-based high-level policy. We show that RAHL can achieve an improvement in performance in 9%, 42%, and 10% in 5 episodes of execution in strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T22:40:01Z)
• Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement [50.481380478458945]
  Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:29:13Z)
• Trial and Error: Exploration-Based Trajectory Optimization for LLM Agents [49.85633804913796]
  We present an exploration-based trajectory optimization approach, referred to as ETO. This learning method is designed to enhance the performance of open LLM agents. Our experiments on three complex tasks demonstrate that ETO consistently surpasses baseline performance by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T21:50:29Z)
• Task-Agnostic Continual Reinforcement Learning: Gaining Insights and Overcoming Challenges [27.474011433615317]
  Continual learning (CL) enables the development of models and agents that learn from a sequence of tasks. We investigate the factors that contribute to the performance differences between task-agnostic CL and multi-task (MTL) agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T17:59:00Z)
• Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Models [120.31359262226758]
  Plan2Explore is a self-supervised reinforcement learning agent. We present a new approach to self-supervised exploration and fast adaptation to new tasks. Without any training supervision or task-specific interaction, Plan2Explore outperforms prior self-supervised exploration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T17:59:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.