Large Scale Knowledge Washing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16720v2
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:48:12 GMT
• Title: Large Scale Knowledge Washing
• Authors: Yu Wang, Ruihan Wu, Zexue He, Xiusi Chen, Julian McAuley,
• Abstract summary: Large language models show impressive abilities in memorizing world knowledge. We introduce the problem of Large Scale Knowledge Washing, focusing on unlearning an extensive amount of factual knowledge.
• Score: 24.533316191149677
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models show impressive abilities in memorizing world knowledge, which leads to concerns regarding memorization of private information, toxic or sensitive knowledge, and copyrighted content. We introduce the problem of Large Scale Knowledge Washing, focusing on unlearning an extensive amount of factual knowledge. Previous unlearning methods usually define the reverse loss and update the model via backpropagation, which may affect the model's fluency and reasoning ability or even destroy the model due to extensive training with the reverse loss. Existing works introduce additional data from downstream tasks to prevent the model from losing capabilities, which requires downstream task awareness. Controlling the tradeoff of unlearning and maintaining existing capabilities is also challenging. To this end, we propose LAW (Large Scale Washing) to update the MLP layers in decoder-only large language models to perform knowledge washing, as inspired by model editing methods and based on the hypothesis that knowledge and reasoning are disentanglable. We derive a new objective with the knowledge to be unlearned to update the weights of certain MLP layers. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of LAW in forgetting target knowledge while maintaining reasoning ability. The code will be open-sourced at https://github.com/wangyu-ustc/LargeScaleWashing.

Related papers

• Gradual Learning: Optimizing Fine-Tuning with Partially Mastered Knowledge in Large Language Models [51.20499954955646]
  Large language models (LLMs) acquire vast amounts of knowledge from extensive text corpora during the pretraining phase. In later stages such as fine-tuning and inference, the model may encounter knowledge not covered in the initial training. We propose a two-stage fine-tuning strategy to improve the model's overall test accuracy and knowledge retention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T08:35:16Z)
• To Forget or Not? Towards Practical Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models [39.39428450239399]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive corpora inevitably retain sensitive data, such as personal privacy information and copyrighted material. Recent advancements in knowledge unlearning involve updating LLM parameters to erase specific knowledge. We introduce KnowUnDo to evaluate if the unlearning process inadvertently erases essential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T03:34:16Z)
• UnUnlearning: Unlearning is not sufficient for content regulation in advanced generative AI [50.61495097098296]
  We revisit the paradigm in which unlearning is used for Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce a concept of ununlearning, where unlearned knowledge gets reintroduced in-context. We argue that content filtering for impermissible knowledge will be required and even exact unlearning schemes are not enough for effective content regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T10:24:35Z)
• Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations? [33.702498916775426]
  We study the impact of new knowledge on the capability of the fine-tuned model to utilize its pre-existing knowledge. We demonstrate that large language models struggle to acquire new factual knowledge through fine-tuning. As the examples with new knowledge are eventually learned, they linearly increase the model's tendency to hallucinate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T17:00:22Z)
• DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models [79.01926242857613]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations, generating content that deviates from facts seen during pretraining. We propose a simple decoding strategy for reducing hallucinations with pretrained LLMs. We find that this Decoding by Contrasting Layers (DoLa) approach is able to better surface factual knowledge and reduce the generation of incorrect facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T17:45:31Z)
• The Effect of Masking Strategies on Knowledge Retention by Language Models [9.130890741447422]
  This paper aims to understand the effect of pre-training tasks on the amount of knowledge captured and forgotten by language models. We test the model's knowledge retention by measuring its ability to answer factual questions. Our findings demonstrate that, like the ability to perform a task, the knowledge acquired from being trained on that task is forgotten when a model is trained to perform another task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T15:35:23Z)
• Decouple knowledge from parameters for plug-and-play language modeling [77.5601135412186]
  We introduce PlugLM, a pre-training model with differentiable plug-in memory(DPM) The key intuition is to decouple the knowledge storage from model parameters with an editable and scalable key-value memory. PlugLM obtains 3.95 F1 improvements across four domains on average without any in-domain pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T10:01:55Z)
• The Web Can Be Your Oyster for Improving Large Language Models [98.72358969495835]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode a large amount of world knowledge. We consider augmenting LLMs with the large-scale web using search engine. We present a web-augmented LLM UNIWEB, which is trained over 16 knowledge-intensive tasks in a unified text-to-text format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T14:20:32Z)
• Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge [72.63368052592004]
  We study LMs' abilities to make inferences based on injected facts (or propagate those facts) We find that existing methods for updating knowledge show little propagation of injected knowledge. Yet, prepending entity definitions in an LM's context improves performance across all settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T17:59:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.