Oracle-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Max Value Ensembles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16739v1
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 01:08:23 GMT
- Title: Oracle-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Max Value Ensembles
- Authors: Marcel Hussing, Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth, Sikata Bela Sengupta, Jessica Sorrell,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) in large or infinite state spaces is notoriously challenging, theoretically and experimentally.
In this work we aim to compete with the $textitmax-following policy$, which at each state follows the action of whichever constituent policy has the highest value.
Our main result is an efficient algorithm that learns to compete with the max-following policy, given only access to the constituent policies.
- Score: 7.404901768256101
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) in large or infinite state spaces is notoriously challenging, both theoretically (where worst-case sample and computational complexities must scale with state space cardinality) and experimentally (where function approximation and policy gradient techniques often scale poorly and suffer from instability and high variance). One line of research attempting to address these difficulties makes the natural assumption that we are given a collection of heuristic base or $\textit{constituent}$ policies upon which we would like to improve in a scalable manner. In this work we aim to compete with the $\textit{max-following policy}$, which at each state follows the action of whichever constituent policy has the highest value. The max-following policy is always at least as good as the best constituent policy, and may be considerably better. Our main result is an efficient algorithm that learns to compete with the max-following policy, given only access to the constituent policies (but not their value functions). In contrast to prior work in similar settings, our theoretical results require only the minimal assumption of an ERM oracle for value function approximation for the constituent policies (and not the global optimal policy or the max-following policy itself) on samplable distributions. We illustrate our algorithm's experimental effectiveness and behavior on several robotic simulation testbeds.
Related papers
- Confident Natural Policy Gradient for Local Planning in $q_π$-realizable Constrained MDPs [44.69257217086967]
The constrained Markov decision process (CMDP) framework emerges as an important reinforcement learning approach for imposing safety or other critical objectives.
In this paper, we address the learning problem given linear function approximation with $q_pi$-realizability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T17:57:13Z) - Thompson Exploration with Best Challenger Rule in Best Arm
Identification [66.33448474838342]
We study the fixed-confidence best arm identification problem in the bandit framework.
We propose a novel policy that combines Thompson sampling with a computationally efficient approach known as the best challenger rule.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-01T01:37:02Z) - Importance-Weighted Offline Learning Done Right [16.4989952150404]
We study the problem of offline policy optimization in contextual bandit problems.
The goal is to learn a near-optimal policy based on a dataset of decision data collected by a suboptimal behavior policy.
We show that a simple alternative approach based on the "implicit exploration" estimator of citet2015 yields performance guarantees that are superior in nearly all possible terms to all previous results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T16:42:10Z) - Restless Bandits with Average Reward: Breaking the Uniform Global
Attractor Assumption [12.471848976031904]
A fundamental goal is to efficiently compute policies that achieve a diminishing optimality gap as the number of arms, $N$, grows large.
Existing results on optimality all rely on the uniform global attractor property (UGAP), a complex and challenging-to-verify assumption.
We propose a general, simulation-based framework, that converts any single-armed policy into a policy for the original $N$-armed problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T21:26:43Z) - Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequality [94.89246810243053]
This paper studies offline policy learning, which aims at utilizing observations collected a priori to learn an optimal individualized decision rule.
Existing policy learning methods rely on a uniform overlap assumption, i.e., the propensities of exploring all actions for all individual characteristics must be lower bounded.
We propose Pessimistic Policy Learning (PPL), a new algorithm that optimize lower confidence bounds (LCBs) instead of point estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T22:43:08Z) - Nearly Optimal Latent State Decoding in Block MDPs [74.51224067640717]
In episodic Block MDPs, the decision maker has access to rich observations or contexts generated from a small number of latent states.
We are first interested in estimating the latent state decoding function based on data generated under a fixed behavior policy.
We then study the problem of learning near-optimal policies in the reward-free framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-17T18:49:53Z) - Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement
Learning with General Function Approximation [107.54516740713969]
We study human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (RL) with trajectory preferences.
Instead of receiving a numeric reward at each step, the agent only receives preferences over trajectory pairs from a human overseer.
We propose the first optimistic model-based algorithm for PbRL with general function approximation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T09:03:24Z) - CAMEO: Curiosity Augmented Metropolis for Exploratory Optimal Policies [62.39667564455059]
We consider and study a distribution of optimal policies.
In experimental simulations we show that CAMEO indeed obtains policies that all solve classic control problems.
We further show that the different policies we sample present different risk profiles, corresponding to interesting practical applications in interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T09:48:56Z) - Implicitly Regularized RL with Implicit Q-Values [42.87920755961722]
The $Q$-function is a central quantity in many Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms for which RL agents behave following a (soft)-greedy policy.
We propose to parametrize the $Q$-function implicitly, as the sum of a log-policy and of a value function.
We derive a practical off-policy deep RL algorithm, suitable for large action spaces, and that enforces the softmax relation between the policy and the $Q$-value.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-16T12:20:47Z) - Restless Bandits with Many Arms: Beating the Central Limit Theorem [25.639496138046546]
finite-horizon restless bandits with multiple pulls per period play an important role in recommender systems, active learning, revenue management, and many other areas.
While an optimal policy can be computed, in principle, using dynamic programming, the computation required scales exponentially in the number of arms $N$.
We characterize a non-degeneracy condition and a class of novel practically-computable policies, called fluid-priority policies, in which the optimality gap is $O(1)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-25T23:27:12Z) - Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimization [105.7510838453122]
We study the Safe Reinforcement Learning (SRL) problem using the Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) formulation.
We present an provably efficient online policy optimization algorithm for CMDP with safe exploration in the function approximation setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-01T17:47:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.