Model Ensembling for Constrained Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16752v1
• Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 01:48:07 GMT
• Title: Model Ensembling for Constrained Optimization
• Authors: Ira Globus-Harris, Varun Gupta, Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth,
• Abstract summary: We consider a setting in which we wish to ensemble models for multidimensional output predictions that are in turn used for downstream optimization. More precisely, we imagine we are given a number of models mapping a state space to multidimensional real-valued predictions. These predictions form the coefficients of a linear objective that we would like to optimize under specified constraints. We apply multicalibration techniques that lead to two provably efficient and convergent algorithms.
• Score: 7.4351710906830375
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There is a long history in machine learning of model ensembling, beginning with boosting and bagging and continuing to the present day. Much of this history has focused on combining models for classification and regression, but recently there is interest in more complex settings such as ensembling policies in reinforcement learning. Strong connections have also emerged between ensembling and multicalibration techniques. In this work, we further investigate these themes by considering a setting in which we wish to ensemble models for multidimensional output predictions that are in turn used for downstream optimization. More precisely, we imagine we are given a number of models mapping a state space to multidimensional real-valued predictions. These predictions form the coefficients of a linear objective that we would like to optimize under specified constraints. The fundamental question we address is how to improve and combine such models in a way that outperforms the best of them in the downstream optimization problem. We apply multicalibration techniques that lead to two provably efficient and convergent algorithms. The first of these (the white box approach) requires being given models that map states to output predictions, while the second (the \emph{black box} approach) requires only policies (mappings from states to solutions to the optimization problem). For both, we provide convergence and utility guarantees. We conclude by investigating the performance and behavior of the two algorithms in a controlled experimental setting.

Related papers

• OPUS: Occupancy Prediction Using a Sparse Set [64.60854562502523]
  We present a framework to simultaneously predict occupied locations and classes using a set of learnable queries. OPUS incorporates a suite of non-trivial strategies to enhance model performance. Our lightest model achieves superior RayIoU on the Occ3D-nuScenes dataset at near 2x FPS, while our heaviest model surpasses previous best results by 6.1 RayIoU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-14T07:44:22Z)
• Improved Distribution Matching for Dataset Condensation [91.55972945798531]
  We propose a novel dataset condensation method based on distribution matching. Our simple yet effective method outperforms most previous optimization-oriented methods with much fewer computational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T04:07:33Z)
• Careful! Training Relevance is Real [0.7742297876120561]
  We propose constraints designed to enforce training relevance. We show through a collection of experimental results that adding the suggested constraints significantly improves the quality of solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T11:54:31Z)
• Predict and Optimize: Through the Lens of Learning to Rank [9.434400627011108]
  We show the noise contrastive estimation can be considered a case of learning to rank the solution cache. We also develop pairwise and listwise ranking loss functions, which can be differentiated in closed form without the need of solving the optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T10:11:44Z)
• Data Summarization via Bilevel Optimization [48.89977988203108]
  A simple yet powerful approach is to operate on small subsets of data. In this work, we propose a generic coreset framework that formulates the coreset selection as a cardinality-constrained bilevel optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T09:08:38Z)
• The Perils of Learning Before Optimizing [16.97597806975415]
  We show how prediction models can be learned end-to-end by differentiating through the optimization task. We show that the performance gap between a two-stage and end-to-end approach is closely related to the emphprice of correlation concept in optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T20:43:47Z)
• Bayesian Optimisation for Constrained Problems [0.0]
  We propose a novel variant of the well-known Knowledge Gradient acquisition function that allows it to handle constraints. We empirically compare the new algorithm with four other state-of-the-art constrained Bayesian optimisation algorithms and demonstrate its superior performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T15:43:09Z)
• Personalizing Performance Regression Models to Black-Box Optimization Problems [0.755972004983746]
  In this work, we propose a personalized regression approach for numerical optimization problems. We also investigate the impact of selecting not a single regression model per problem, but personalized ensembles. We test our approach on predicting the performance of numerical optimizations on the BBOB benchmark collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T11:47:47Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Divide and Learn: A Divide and Conquer Approach for Predict+Optimize [50.03608569227359]
  The predict+optimize problem combines machine learning ofproblem coefficients with a optimization prob-lem that uses the predicted coefficients. We show how to directlyexpress the loss of the optimization problem in terms of thepredicted coefficients as a piece-wise linear function. We propose a novel divide and algorithm to tackle optimization problems without this restriction and predict itscoefficients using the optimization loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T00:26:56Z)
• Stepwise Model Selection for Sequence Prediction via Deep Kernel Learning [100.83444258562263]
  We propose a novel Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm to tackle the challenge of model selection in this setting. In order to solve the resulting multiple black-box function optimization problem jointly and efficiently, we exploit potential correlations among black-box functions. We are the first to formulate the problem of stepwise model selection (SMS) for sequence prediction, and to design and demonstrate an efficient joint-learning algorithm for this purpose.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-12T09:42:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.