MockLLM: A Multi-Agent Behavior Collaboration Framework for Online Job Seeking and Recruiting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18113v2
• Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 06:33:55 GMT
• Title: MockLLM: A Multi-Agent Behavior Collaboration Framework for Online Job Seeking and Recruiting
• Authors: Hongda Sun, Hongzhan Lin, Haiyu Yan, Yang Song, Xin Gao, Rui Yan,
• Abstract summary: We propose textbfMockLLM, a novel framework to generate and evaluate mock interview interactions.<n>By simulating both interviewer and candidate roles, MockLLM enables consistent and collaborative interactions for real-time and two-sided matching.<n>We evaluate MockLLM on real-world data Boss Zhipin, a major Chinese recruitment platform.
• Score: 29.676163697160945
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Online recruitment platforms have reshaped job-seeking and recruiting processes, driving increased demand for applications that enhance person-job matching. Traditional methods generally rely on analyzing textual data from resumes and job descriptions, limiting the dynamic, interactive aspects crucial to effective recruitment. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revealed remarkable potential in simulating adaptive, role-based dialogues, making them well-suited for recruitment scenarios. In this paper, we propose \textbf{MockLLM}, a novel framework to generate and evaluate mock interview interactions. The system consists of two key components: mock interview generation and two-sided evaluation in handshake protocol. By simulating both interviewer and candidate roles, MockLLM enables consistent and collaborative interactions for real-time and two-sided matching. To further improve the matching quality, MockLLM further incorporates reflection memory generation and dynamic strategy modification, refining behaviors based on previous experience. We evaluate MockLLM on real-world data Boss Zhipin, a major Chinese recruitment platform. The experimental results indicate that MockLLM outperforms existing methods in matching accuracy, scalability, and adaptability across job domains, highlighting its potential to advance candidate assessment and online recruitment.

Related papers

• Dynamic Role Assignment for Multi-Agent Debate [14.507557609798615]
  Multi-agent large language model (LLM) and vision-language model (VLM) debate systems employ specialized roles for complex problem-solving.<n>We propose dynamic role assignment, a framework that runs a Meta-Debate to select suitable agents before the actual debate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T20:15:29Z)
• Agentic Conversational Search with Contextualized Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [66.52010873968383]
  We introduce a conversational agent that interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through reinforcement learning (RL) training.<n>The experimental results across four widely used conversational benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T14:55:54Z)
• SimRPD: Optimizing Recruitment Proactive Dialogue Agents through Simulator-Based Data Evaluation and Selection [19.80033581334685]
  SimRPD is a three-stage framework for training recruitment proactive dialogue agents.<n>First, we develop a high-fidelity user simulator to synthesize large-scale conversational data.<n>Then, we introduce a multi-dimensional evaluation framework based on Chain-of-Intention.<n>Finally, we train the recruitment proactive dialogue agent on the selected dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T10:00:15Z)
• Agent4FaceForgery: Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Realistic Face Forgery Detection [108.5042835056188]
  This work introduces Agent4FaceForgery to address two fundamental problems.<n>How to capture the diverse intents and iterative processes of human forgery creation.<n>How to model the complex, often adversarial, text-image interactions that accompany forgeries in social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T01:05:01Z)
• Multi-View Graph Convolution Network for Internal Talent Recommendation Based on Enterprise Emails [5.282071089128208]
  Internal talent recommendation is a critical strategy for organizational continuity.<n>We propose a novel framework that models two distinct dimensions of an employee's position fit from email data.<n> Experiments show that our proposed gating-based fusion model significantly outperforms other fusion strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T00:11:24Z)
• Beyond Single-Turn: A Survey on Multi-Turn Interactions with Large Language Models [8.08979200534563]
  Real-world applications demand sophisticated multi-turn interactions. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized their ability to handle single-turn tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T04:00:08Z)
• Using Large Language Models to Develop Requirements Elicitation Skills [1.1473376666000734]
  We propose conditioning a large language model to play the role of the client during a chat-based interview. We find that both approaches provide sufficient information for participants to construct technically sound solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T19:27:38Z)
• Towards Anthropomorphic Conversational AI Part I: A Practical Framework [49.62013440962072]
  We introduce a multi- module framework designed to replicate the key aspects of human intelligence involved in conversations. In the second stage of our approach, these conversational data, after filtering and labeling, can serve as training and testing data for reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T03:18:39Z)
• Dynamic benchmarking framework for LLM-based conversational data capture [0.0]
  This paper introduces a benchmarking framework to assess large language models (LLMs)<n>It integrates generative agent simulation to evaluate performance on key dimensions: information extraction, context awareness, and adaptive engagement.<n>Results show that adaptive strategies improve data extraction accuracy, especially when handling ambiguous responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T15:47:47Z)
• DISCO: A Hierarchical Disentangled Cognitive Diagnosis Framework for Interpretable Job Recommendation [36.83681330970353]
  The rapid development of online recruitment platforms has created unprecedented opportunities for job seekers. Job recommendation systems have significantly alleviated the extensive search burden for job seekers. Research on the explainability of recruitment recommendations remains profoundly unexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T07:29:31Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions [62.0123588983514]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated wide-ranging applications across various fields. We reformulate the peer-review process as a multi-turn, long-context dialogue, incorporating distinct roles for authors, reviewers, and decision makers. We construct a comprehensive dataset containing over 26,841 papers with 92,017 reviews collected from multiple sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T08:24:17Z)
• Concept Matching with Agent for Out-of-Distribution Detection [19.407364109506904]
  We propose a new method that integrates the agent paradigm into out-of-distribution (OOD) detection task.<n>Our proposed method, Concept Matching with Agent (CMA), employs neutral prompts as agents to augment the CLIP-based OOD detection process.<n>Our extensive experimental results showcase the superior performance of CMA over both zero-shot and training-required methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T02:27:28Z)
• UniRetriever: Multi-task Candidates Selection for Various Context-Adaptive Conversational Retrieval [47.40553943948673]
  We propose a multi-task framework function as a universal retriever for three dominant retrieval tasks during the conversation: persona selection, knowledge selection, and response selection. To this end, we design a dual-encoder architecture consisting of a context-adaptive dialogue encoder and a candidate encoder. Experiments and analysis establish state-of-the-art retrieval quality both within and outside its training domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T02:48:43Z)
• MAgIC: Investigation of Large Language Model Powered Multi-Agent in Cognition, Adaptability, Rationality and Collaboration [102.41118020705876]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing. As their applications extend into multi-agent environments, a need has arisen for a comprehensive evaluation framework. This work introduces a novel benchmarking framework specifically tailored to assess LLMs within multi-agent settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T21:46:27Z)
• Workflow-Guided Response Generation for Task-Oriented Dialogue [4.440232673676693]
  We propose a novel framework based on reinforcement learning (RL) to generate dialogue responses that are aligned with a given workflow. Our framework consists of ComplianceScorer, a metric designed to evaluate how well a generated response executes the specified action. Our findings indicate that our RL-based framework outperforms baselines and is effective at enerating responses that both comply with the intended while being expressed in a natural and fluent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T16:44:33Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• JoTR: A Joint Transformer and Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dialog Policy Learning [53.83063435640911]
  Dialogue policy learning (DPL) is a crucial component of dialogue modelling. We introduce a novel framework, JoTR, to generate flexible dialogue actions. Unlike traditional methods, JoTR formulates a word-level policy that allows for a more dynamic and adaptable dialogue action generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T03:19:53Z)
• SimOAP: Improve Coherence and Consistency in Persona-based Dialogue Generation via Over-sampling and Post-evaluation [54.66399120084227]
  Language models trained on large-scale corpora can generate remarkably fluent results in open-domain dialogue. For the persona-based dialogue generation task, consistency and coherence are great challenges for language models. A two-stage SimOAP strategy is proposed, i.e., over-sampling and post-evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T17:23:00Z)
• Exploring Emerging Technologies for Requirements Elicitation Interview Training: Empirical Assessment of Robotic and Virtual Tutors [0.0]
  We propose an architecture for Requirements Elicitation Interview Training system based on emerging educational technologies. We demonstrate the applicability of REIT through two implementations: Ro with a physical robotic agent and Vo with a virtual voice-only agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T20:03:48Z)
• Deploying a Retrieval based Response Model for Task Oriented Dialogues [8.671263996400844]
  Task-oriented dialogue systems need to have high conversational capability, be easily adaptable to changing situations and conform to business constraints. This paper describes a 3-step procedure to develop a conversational model that satisfies these criteria and can efficiently scale to rank a large set of response candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T23:10:19Z)
• Quality Assurance of Generative Dialog Models in an Evolving Conversational Agent Used for Swedish Language Practice [59.705062519344]
  One proposed solution involves AI-enabled conversational agents for person-centered interactive language practice. We present results from ongoing action research targeting quality assurance of proprietary generative dialog models trained for virtual job interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T10:25:13Z)
• Partner Matters! An Empirical Study on Fusing Personas for Personalized Response Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbots [51.091235903442715]
  This paper makes an attempt to explore the impact of utilizing personas that describe either self or partner speakers on the task of response selection. Four persona fusion strategies are designed, which assume personas interact with contexts or responses in different ways. Empirical studies on the Persona-Chat dataset show that the partner personas can improve the accuracy of response selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T10:32:30Z)
• Learning an Effective Context-Response Matching Model with Self-Supervised Tasks for Retrieval-based Dialogues [88.73739515457116]
  We introduce four self-supervised tasks including next session prediction, utterance restoration, incoherence detection and consistency discrimination. We jointly train the PLM-based response selection model with these auxiliary tasks in a multi-task manner. Experiment results indicate that the proposed auxiliary self-supervised tasks bring significant improvement for multi-turn response selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T08:44:46Z)
• Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skills [31.42833993937429]
  We investigate ways to combine models trained towards isolated capabilities. We propose a new dataset, BlendedSkillTalk, to analyze how these capabilities would mesh together in a natural conversation. Our experiments show that multi-tasking over several tasks that focus on particular capabilities results in better blended conversation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T20:51:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.