Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18718v1
• Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 02:57:07 GMT
• Title: Efficient Model-agnostic Alignment via Bayesian Persuasion
• Authors: Fengshuo Bai, Mingzhi Wang, Zhaowei Zhang, Boyuan Chen, Yinda Xu, Ying Wen, Yaodong Yang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a model-agnostic and lightweight Bayesian Persuasion Alignment framework. In the persuasion process, the small model (Advisor) observes the information item (i.e., state) and persuades large models (Receiver) to elicit improved responses. We show that GPT-2 can significantly improve the performance of various models, achieving an average enhancement of 16.1% in mathematical reasoning ability and 13.7% in code generation.
• Score: 13.42367964190663
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), alignment has emerged as an effective technique for keeping LLMs consensus with human intent. Current methods primarily involve direct training through Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) or Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), both of which require substantial computational resources and extensive ground truth data. This paper explores an efficient method for aligning black-box large models using smaller models, introducing a model-agnostic and lightweight Bayesian Persuasion Alignment framework. We formalize this problem as an optimization of the signaling strategy from the small model's perspective. In the persuasion process, the small model (Advisor) observes the information item (i.e., state) and persuades large models (Receiver) to elicit improved responses. The Receiver then generates a response based on the input, the signal from the Advisor, and its updated belief about the information item. Through training using our framework, we demonstrate that the Advisor can significantly enhance the performance of various Receivers across a range of tasks. We theoretically analyze our persuasion framework and provide an upper bound on the Advisor's regret, confirming its effectiveness in learning the optimal signaling strategy. Our Empirical results demonstrates that GPT-2 can significantly improve the performance of various models, achieving an average enhancement of 16.1% in mathematical reasoning ability and 13.7% in code generation. We hope our work can provide an initial step toward rethinking the alignment framework from the Bayesian Persuasion perspective.

Related papers

• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignment [65.15914284008973]
  We propose to leverage an Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) technique to simultaneously build an reward model and a policy model. We show that the proposed algorithms converge to the stationary solutions of the IRL problem. Our results indicate that it is beneficial to leverage reward learning throughout the entire alignment process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:11:05Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Efficient Multi-Model Fusion with Adversarial Complementary Representation Learning [26.393644289860084]
  Single-model systems often suffer from deficiencies in tasks such as speaker verification (SV) and image classification. We propose an adversarial complementary representation learning (ACoRL) framework that enables newly trained models to avoid previously acquired knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T07:47:55Z)
• Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedback [17.420727709895736]
  This paper provides an attempt to theoretically analyze the learning dynamics of human preference alignment. We show how the distribution of preference datasets influences the rate of model updates and provide rigorous guarantees on the training accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:39:28Z)
• When Parameter-efficient Tuning Meets General-purpose Vision-language Models [65.19127815275307]
  PETAL revolutionizes the training process by requiring only 0.5% of the total parameters, achieved through a unique mode approximation technique. Our experiments reveal that PETAL not only outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in most scenarios but also surpasses full fine-tuning models in effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T17:13:08Z)
• Faithful Explanations of Black-box NLP Models Using LLM-generated Counterfactuals [67.64770842323966]
  Causal explanations of predictions of NLP systems are essential to ensure safety and establish trust. Existing methods often fall short of explaining model predictions effectively or efficiently. We propose two approaches for counterfactual (CF) approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T07:31:04Z)
• Weighted Ensemble Self-Supervised Learning [67.24482854208783]
  Ensembling has proven to be a powerful technique for boosting model performance. We develop a framework that permits data-dependent weighted cross-entropy losses. Our method outperforms both in multiple evaluation metrics on ImageNet-1K.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T02:00:17Z)
• Feeding What You Need by Understanding What You Learned [54.400455868448695]
  Machine Reading (MRC) reveals the ability to understand a given text passage and answer questions based on it. Existing research works in MRC rely heavily on large-size models and corpus to improve the performance evaluated by metrics such as Exact Match. We argue that a deep understanding of model capabilities and data properties can help us feed a model with appropriate training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-05T14:15:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.