Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19320v3
• Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 04:59:42 GMT
• Title: Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF
• Authors: Shicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai, Tong Yang, Sherry Yang, Dale Schuurmans, Yuejie Chi, Bo Dai,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a unified approach to online and offline RLHF -- value-incentivized preference optimization (VPO) VPO regularizes the maximum-likelihood estimate of the reward function with the corresponding value function. Experiments on text summarization and dialog verify the practicality and effectiveness of VPO.
• Score: 80.32171988565999
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has demonstrated great promise in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preference. Depending on the availability of preference data, both online and offline RLHF are active areas of investigation. A key bottleneck is understanding how to incorporate uncertainty estimation in the reward function learned from the preference data for RLHF, regardless of how the preference data is collected. While the principles of optimism or pessimism under uncertainty are well-established in standard reinforcement learning (RL), a practically-implementable and theoretically-grounded form amenable to large language models is not yet available, as standard techniques for constructing confidence intervals become intractable under arbitrary policy parameterizations. In this paper, we introduce a unified approach to online and offline RLHF -- value-incentivized preference optimization (VPO) -- which regularizes the maximum-likelihood estimate of the reward function with the corresponding value function, modulated by a $\textit{sign}$ to indicate whether the optimism or pessimism is chosen. VPO also directly optimizes the policy with implicit reward modeling, and therefore shares a simpler RLHF pipeline similar to direct preference optimization. Theoretical guarantees of VPO are provided for both online and offline settings, matching the rates of their standard RL counterparts. Moreover, experiments on text summarization and dialog verify the practicality and effectiveness of VPO.

Related papers

• PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling [14.336058926701432]
  We propose Policy-Interpolated Learning for Aligned Feedback (PILAF), a novel response sampling strategy for preference labeling. PILAF explicitly aligns preference learning with maximizing the underlying oracle reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:09:00Z)
• Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration [46.46627519343809]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has shown great potential in fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) to align with human preferences. Existing methods perform preference alignment from a fixed dataset, which can be limited in data coverage. Online RLHF is more desirable to empower the LLM to explore outside the support of the initial dataset by iteratively collecting the prompt-response pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T09:12:09Z)
• Preference Elicitation for Offline Reinforcement Learning [59.136381500967744]
  We propose Sim-OPRL, an offline preference-based reinforcement learning algorithm. Our algorithm employs a pessimistic approach for out-of-distribution data, and an optimistic approach for acquiring informative preferences about the optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T15:59:13Z)
• SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models [56.59644677997827]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback is a key method for aligning large language models with human preferences. Recent literature has focused on designing online RLHF methods but still lacks a unified conceptual formulation. Our approach significantly improves alignment performance on open-sourced datasets with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T18:05:35Z)
• The Importance of Online Data: Understanding Preference Fine-tuning via Coverage [25.782644676250115]
  We study the similarities and differences between online and offline techniques for preference fine-tuning. We prove that a global coverage condition is both necessary and sufficient for offline contrastive methods to converge to the optimal policy. We derive a hybrid preference optimization algorithm that uses offline data for contrastive-based preference optimization and online data for KL regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T15:51:04Z)
• Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
  We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data. Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z)
• Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment [93.39181634597877]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) was proposed to directly optimize the policy from preference data. We show that DPO derived based on the optimal solution of problem leads to a compromised mean-seeking approximation of the optimal solution in practice. We propose efficient exact optimization (EXO) of the alignment objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:51:54Z)
• OptiDICE: Offline Policy Optimization via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation [59.469401906712555]
  We present an offline reinforcement learning algorithm that prevents overestimation in a more principled way. Our algorithm, OptiDICE, directly estimates the stationary distribution corrections of the optimal policy. We show that OptiDICE performs competitively with the state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T00:43:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.